• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于提高健康素养和健康行为意图的质量控制YouTube内容干预:一项随机对照研究。

Quality controlled YouTube content intervention for enhancing health literacy and health behavioural intention: A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Park Yujin, Kim Su Hwan, Yoon Hyung-Jin

机构信息

Healthcare Data Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Information Statistics, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Jun 17;10:20552076241263691. doi: 10.1177/20552076241263691. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241263691
PMID:38894944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11185003/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals increasingly turn to the Internet for health information, with YouTube being a prominent source. However, the quality and reliability of the health information vary widely, potentially affecting health literacy and behavioural intentions.

METHODS

To analyse the impact of health information quality on health literacy and behavioural intention, we conducted a randomized controlled trial using a quality-controlled YouTube intervention. Health information quality on YouTube was evaluated using the Global Quality Score and DISCERN. We randomly allocated (1 : 1) to the intervention group to watch the highest quality-evaluated content and to the control group to watch the lowest quality-evaluated content. Health literacy and health behavioural intention were assessed before and after watching YouTube. The trial was set for two different topics: interpreting laboratory test results from health check-up and information about inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

RESULTS

From 8 April 2022 to 15 April 2022, 505 participants were randomly assigned to watch either high-quality content (intervention group, n = 255) or low-quality content (control group, n = 250). Health literacy significantly improved in the intervention group (28.1 before and 31.8 after;  < 0.01 for health check-up; 28.3 before and 31.3 after;  < 0.01 for IBD). Health behavioural intention significantly improved in the intervention group (3.5 before and 4.1 after;  < 0.01 for health check-up; 3.6 before and 4.0 after;  < 0.01 for IBD). Control groups had no such effect.

CONCLUSION

High-quality health information can enhance health literacy and behavioural intention in both healthy individuals and those with specific conditions like IBD. It stresses the significance of ensuring reliable health information online and calls for future efforts to curate and provide access to high-quality health content.

摘要

背景

人们越来越多地通过互联网获取健康信息,YouTube是一个重要的信息来源。然而,健康信息的质量和可靠性差异很大,可能会影响健康素养和行为意图。

方法

为了分析健康信息质量对健康素养和行为意图的影响,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,采用了经过质量控制的YouTube干预措施。使用全球质量评分和DISCERN对YouTube上的健康信息质量进行评估。我们将参与者随机分配(1∶1)到干预组观看质量评估最高的内容,以及对照组观看质量评估最低的内容。在观看YouTube前后评估健康素养和健康行为意图。该试验针对两个不同主题进行:解读健康检查的实验室检测结果以及炎症性肠病(IBD)的信息。

结果

从2022年4月8日至2022年4月15日,505名参与者被随机分配观看高质量内容(干预组,n = 255)或低质量内容(对照组,n = 250)。干预组的健康素养显著提高(健康检查主题:干预前28.1,干预后31.8;P<0.01;IBD主题:干预前28.3,干预后31.3;P<0.01)。干预组的健康行为意图显著提高(健康检查主题:干预前3.5,干预后4.1;P<0.01;IBD主题:干预前3.6,干预后4.0;P<0.01)。对照组则没有这种效果。

结论

高质量的健康信息可以提高健康个体以及患有IBD等特定疾病的人群的健康素养和行为意图。这强调了确保在线健康信息可靠性的重要性,并呼吁未来努力策划和提供高质量的健康内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4114/11185003/e6f11cf2175f/10.1177_20552076241263691-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4114/11185003/cf6c164bc25a/10.1177_20552076241263691-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4114/11185003/e6f11cf2175f/10.1177_20552076241263691-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4114/11185003/cf6c164bc25a/10.1177_20552076241263691-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4114/11185003/e6f11cf2175f/10.1177_20552076241263691-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality controlled YouTube content intervention for enhancing health literacy and health behavioural intention: A randomized controlled study.用于提高健康素养和健康行为意图的质量控制YouTube内容干预:一项随机对照研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Jun 17;10:20552076241263691. doi: 10.1177/20552076241263691. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy.提高消费者在线健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;2011(6):CD007092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007092.pub2.
3
Effects of two-week e-learning on eHealth literacy: a randomized controlled trial of Japanese Internet users.为期两周的电子学习对电子健康素养的影响:一项针对日本互联网用户的随机对照试验。
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 13;6:e5251. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5251. eCollection 2018.
4
Moving Beyond the Gym: A Content Analysis of YouTube as an Information Resource for Physical Literacy.超越健身房:YouTube 作为身体素养信息资源的内容分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 10;16(18):3335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183335.
5
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.关于妊娠期糖尿病的YouTube视频内容质量:系统评价
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Apr 7;7(2):e30156. doi: 10.2196/30156.
6
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.关于剖宫产术后疼痛管理的YouTube视频内容质量:内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Jun 23;3:e40802. doi: 10.2196/40802.
7
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.一把双刃剑:YouTube上结肠癌筛查内容的质量与可信度
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent online stress reduction intervention in inflammatory bowel disease.一项针对炎症性肠病的多成分在线减压干预的随机对照试验。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 27;15:17562848221127238. doi: 10.1177/17562848221127238. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploring the Influence of YouTube on Digital Health Literacy and Health Exercise Intentions: The Role of Parasocial Relationships.探索YouTube对数字健康素养和健康锻炼意图的影响:准社会关系的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;14(4):282. doi: 10.3390/bs14040282.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking Young Adults' Fact-Checking Intent on Oral Health Misinformation: Parallel Mediating Roles of Need for Cognition and Perceived Seriousness-A Cross-Sectional Study.剖析年轻人对口腔健康错误信息的事实核查意图:认知需求和感知严重性的平行中介作用——一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;13(11):1354. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111354.
2
YouTube as a Source of Information in Trauma Management for ATLS (10th Edition) Guidelines: Evaluation of Trauma Management Videos on YouTube.YouTube作为美国创伤生命支持(第10版)指南中创伤管理信息来源:对YouTube上创伤管理视频的评估
Emerg Med Int. 2024 Oct 24;2024:7077469. doi: 10.1155/2024/7077469. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a Source of Information for Food, Diet-Related Items, and Advisory Comments for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.YouTube 作为炎症性肠病饮食相关信息、食品及建议的信息来源
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):347-356. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad076.
2
Is YouTube useful as a source of information for approaches to reducing blood pressure and hypertension treatment?YouTube作为降低血压和高血压治疗方法的信息来源是否有用?
Hypertens Res. 2023 Feb;46(2):386-394. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01112-x. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.
YouTube 是健康相关信息的可靠来源吗?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.
4
YouTube as a source of misinformation on COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic analysis.YouTube 作为 COVID-19 疫苗接种错误信息的来源:一项系统分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008334.
5
Smartphone application improves fertility treatment-related literacy in a large-scale virtual randomized controlled trial in Japan.在日本的一项大规模虚拟随机对照试验中,智能手机应用程序提高了与生育治疗相关的知识水平。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 30;4(1):163. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00530-4.
6
Evaluation of quality and educational effect of microsurgery videos on YouTube: a randomized controlled trial.评价 YouTube 上显微手术视频的质量和教学效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2022 Aug;56(4):242-248. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1990936. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
7
Does health literacy affect the uptake of annual physical check-ups?: Results from the 2017 US health information national trends survey.健康素养会影响年度体检的接受情况吗?:2017年美国健康信息国家趋势调查的结果
Arch Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;79(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00556-w.
8
Low Health Literacy Exists in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Population and Is Disproportionately Prevalent in Older African Americans.炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中存在健康素养低下的情况,且在老年非裔美国人中尤为普遍。
Crohns Colitis 360. 2020 Oct;2(4). doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaa076. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
9
A digital health intervention for cardiovascular disease management in primary care (CONNECT) randomized controlled trial.一项针对初级保健中心血管疾病管理的数字健康干预措施(CONNECT)随机对照试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 10;3:117. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00325-z. eCollection 2020.
10
Health Belief, Behavior Intention, and Health Behaviors Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Taiwan.台湾地区与大肠癌筛检相关的健康信念、行为意向与健康行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 14;17(12):4246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124246.