University of Greifswald.
Child Dev. 2020 Nov;91(6):2221-2236. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13354. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
Mainly for methodological reasons, little is known about the course of development of early cognitive competencies diagnosed with the violation of expectation (VoE) method in infants. The goal of this research was to evaluate the use of pupillometry as a unified approach to assess expectancy violations during and beyond the "dark ages" between 1 and 3 years. We tested children aged 1-6 years and adults (N = 279) with pictures of animals combined with matching or mismatching animal sounds. All age groups exhibited significantly greater pupil dilation in mismatched than matched trials. We conclude that pupillometry is a viable alternative to the VoE method that, by contrast to the latter, can be used throughout the life span.
主要由于方法学原因,对于使用违反预期(VoE)方法诊断的婴儿早期认知能力发展过程知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估瞳孔测量作为一种统一的方法,用于评估 1 至 3 岁之间的“黑暗时期”期间和之后的预期违反情况。我们用动物图片和匹配或不匹配的动物声音测试了 1 至 6 岁的儿童和成年人(N=279)。所有年龄段的被试在不匹配试验中比匹配试验表现出更大的瞳孔扩张。我们的结论是,瞳孔测量是 VoE 方法的可行替代方法,与后者相比,它可以在整个生命周期中使用。