School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr;101(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
To explore the predictive ability of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Late Life Function and Disability Instrument-Function component (LLFDI-function) and frailty phenotype, for falls, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and low self-rated health (SRH) over 1 and 2 years in older adults.
Secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal study, the Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly.
Primary care.
Adults 65 years and older at risk for disability who completed ≥1 follow-up call (N=391).
None.
We computed separate logistic regression models using the SPPB, LLFDI-function, and frailty phenotype as independent variables and falls, hospitalizations, ED visits, and SRH over 1 and 2 years as dependent variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and the areas under the curves calculated.
Participants had a mean age of 76.5±7.1 years. The SPPB, LLFDI-function, and frailty phenotype all predicted hospitalizations and low SRH over a 1- and 2-year timeframe (odds ratio [OR] min-max, 1.35-1.51 and 1.67-3.07, respectively). Over 2 years, the SPPB predicted ED visits (OR, 1.28), and the LLFDI-function predicted falls (OR, 1.31). The LLFDI-function predicted low SRH better than the frailty phenotype over 1 year. There were no differences between the measures for any of the other outcomes.
The SPPB, LLFDI-function, and frailty phenotype had similar accuracy for predicting falls, hospitalizations, ED visits, and low SRH over 1 and 2 years among older primary care patients at risk for disability. As a result, when considering the optimal screening tool for older adults, the choice between a measure of function and frailty may ultimately depend on clinical preference and context.
探讨简易体能状况量表(SPPB)、晚年生活功能和残疾工具-功能成分(LLFDI-function)和衰弱表型对老年人 1 年和 2 年内跌倒、住院、急诊就诊和自评健康状况较差(SRH)的预测能力。
对一项纵向研究(波士顿老年康复障碍研究)的数据进行二次分析。
初级保健。
有残疾风险的年龄在 65 岁及以上、至少完成 1 次随访电话的成年人(N=391)。
无。
我们分别使用 SPPB、LLFDI-function 和衰弱表型作为自变量,跌倒、住院、急诊就诊和 1 年和 2 年内的 SRH 作为因变量,计算了单独的逻辑回归模型。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线并计算了曲线下面积。
参与者的平均年龄为 76.5±7.1 岁。SPPB、LLFDI-function 和衰弱表型均能预测 1 年和 2 年内的住院和 SRH 较差(比值比[OR]最小值-最大值,分别为 1.35-1.51 和 1.67-3.07)。2 年内,SPPB 预测 ED 就诊(OR,1.28),LLFDI-function 预测跌倒(OR,1.31)。LLFDI-function 在 1 年内对 SRH 较差的预测优于衰弱表型。在所有其他结果中,这些指标之间没有差异。
在有残疾风险的老年初级保健患者中,SPPB、LLFDI-function 和衰弱表型在预测 1 年和 2 年内的跌倒、住院、ED 就诊和 SRH 较差方面具有相似的准确性。因此,在考虑老年人的最佳筛查工具时,功能和衰弱的衡量标准之间的选择最终可能取决于临床偏好和背景。