Suppr超能文献

虚弱表型标准的修订:对当前文献的系统回顾以及对欧洲健康老龄化和退休调查中的 262 种虚弱表型的研究。

Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Ageing Res Rev. 2015 May;21:78-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review to determine variability in how the criteria of the frailty phenotype (grip strength, weight loss, exhaustion, walking speed, physical activity) were assessed. We then evaluated the impact on estimating prevalence and mortality of modifying the criteria, using the Survey of Health, Ageing, & Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Five databases were searched for original research articles published after 2000, which evaluated frailty using the phenotypic criteria. Among the 264 included studies, 24 studies provided enough information to demonstrate that all criteria were assessed as proposed in the original frailty phenotype study by Fried et al. (2001). Physical inactivity and weight loss were the criteria most often modified. We then created 262 phenotypes from SHARE based on common modifications found in the review. Among these phenotypes, frailty prevalence ranged from 12.7% to 28.2%. Agreement with the primary frailty phenotype ranged from 0.662 to 0.967 and internal consistency ranged from 0.430 to 0.649. Women had 2.1-16.3% higher frailty prevalence than men. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for discriminating five-year mortality ranged from 0.607 (95% CI: 0.583-0.630) to 0.668 (0.645-0.691). The frailty phenotype often has been modified, and these modifications have important impact on its classification and predictive ability.

摘要

我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定在评估虚弱表型(握力、体重减轻、疲惫、步行速度、体力活动)标准时的变异性。然后,我们使用欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)评估了修改标准对估计患病率和死亡率的影响。我们在五个数据库中搜索了 2000 年后发表的评估使用表型标准评估的虚弱的原始研究文章。在 264 项纳入的研究中,有 24 项研究提供了足够的信息,表明 Fried 等人(2001 年)提出的原始虚弱表型研究中的所有标准都得到了评估。身体不活动和体重减轻是最常修改的标准。然后,我们根据综述中发现的常见修改,从 SHARE 中创建了 262 个表型。在这些表型中,虚弱的患病率从 12.7%到 28.2%不等。与主要虚弱表型的一致性从 0.662 到 0.967 不等,内部一致性从 0.430 到 0.649 不等。女性的虚弱患病率比男性高 2.1-16.3%。区分五年死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积从 0.607(95%置信区间:0.583-0.630)到 0.668(0.645-0.691)不等。虚弱表型经常被修改,这些修改对其分类和预测能力有重要影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验