• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in genetically high risk newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.遗传性高危初诊乳腺癌患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05515-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer.在新诊断为乳腺癌的BRCA1/2基因未携带者中,与对侧预防性乳房切除术接受情况相关的心理社会因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4123-x. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素及结局
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Sep;104(3):321-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9423-5. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
4
Quality of life after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer patients who underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing.接受BRCA1/2基因检测的新诊断高危乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术后的生活质量。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 20;25(3):285-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3890. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
5
Frequency of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients with a Negative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Rapid Genetic Test Result.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 快速基因检测结果阴性的乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4967-4973. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09855-6. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions in a Population-Based Sample of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌患者基于人群样本的对侧预防性乳房切除术决策
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):274-282. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749.
7
Predictors of uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with nonhereditary breast cancer.非遗传性乳腺癌女性接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响因素。
Cancer. 2019 Nov 15;125(22):3966-3973. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32405. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌年轻女性的局部治疗决策与对侧预防性乳房切除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3809-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Randomized trial of proactive rapid genetic counseling versus usual care for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.随机试验:主动式快速基因咨询与新诊断乳腺癌患者常规护理的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4773-3. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Women's preferences for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy following unilateral breast cancer: What risk-reduction makes it worthwhile?单侧乳腺癌患者对双侧预防性乳房切除术的偏好:何种风险降低程度使其值得进行?
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of germline genetic testing in surgical decision making for early-stage invasive breast cancer: insights from a safety-net hospital.探索生殖系基因检测在早期浸润性乳腺癌手术决策中的作用:来自一家安全网医院的见解。
J Community Genet. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00806-2.
2
Association of Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Bilateral Disease.中度风险乳腺癌基因与对侧预防性乳房切除术和双侧疾病的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):6990-6999. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14141-8. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
3
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Pathogenic Variants in : Overall Survival, Racial, and Ethnic Differences.携带致病变异的女性行预防性对侧乳房切除术的总生存情况、种族和民族差异分析。
Breast J. 2022 Dec 31;2022:1447545. doi: 10.1155/2022/1447545. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychosocial impact of proactive rapid genetic counseling following breast cancer diagnosis.乳腺癌诊断后主动快速遗传咨询的心理社会影响。
Psychooncology. 2022 May;31(5):788-797. doi: 10.1002/pon.5863. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
5
Predictors of genetic testing uptake in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.新诊断乳腺癌患者基因检测接受度的预测因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):134-143. doi: 10.1002/jso.25956. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients.基于人群的乳腺癌患者和卵巢癌患者队列中的基因检测和结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1305-1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01854. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Utility of Expedited Hereditary Cancer Testing in the Surgical Management of Patients with a New Breast Cancer Diagnosis.加速遗传性癌症检测在新诊断乳腺癌患者外科管理中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3556-3562. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6581-8. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
3
Prospective Study of Psychosocial Outcomes of Having Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women With Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.非遗传性乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的心理社会结局前瞻性研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2630-2638. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.6442. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌诊断后种系多基因测序的检测结果和预后。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1066-1072. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0644.
5
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate and predictive factors among patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer.接受遗传性癌症多基因面板检测的乳腺癌患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术率及预测因素。
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2718-2726. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1519. Epub 2018 May 7.
6
Randomized trial of proactive rapid genetic counseling versus usual care for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.随机试验:主动式快速基因咨询与新诊断乳腺癌患者常规护理的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4773-3. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Gaps in Receipt of Clinically Indicated Genetic Counseling After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌诊断后临床指征遗传咨询的接受情况存在差距。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1218-1224. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2369. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者的乳腺癌、卵巢癌和对侧乳腺癌风险。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112.
10
Bilateral Mastectomy as Overtreatment for Breast Cancer in Women Age Forty Years and Younger with Unilateral Operable Invasive Breast Cancer.双侧乳房切除术作为对年龄40岁及以下单侧可手术浸润性乳腺癌女性乳腺癌的过度治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2168-2173. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5856-9. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

遗传性高危初诊乳腺癌患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素。

Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in genetically high risk newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

机构信息

Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05515-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-019-05515-2
PMID:31894446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7035174/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent trends indicate increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, particularly those who test positive for a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1/2 genes. However, the rate of CPM among patients who test negative or choose not to be tested is surprisingly high. We aimed to identify patient predictors of CPM following breast cancer diagnosis among such patients.

METHODS

As part of a randomized controlled trial of rapid genetic counseling and testing vs. usual care, breast cancer patients completed a baseline survey within 6 weeks of diagnosis and before definitive surgery. Analyses focused on patients who opted against testing (n = 136) or who received negative BRCA1/2 test results (n = 149). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the associations between sociodemographic, clinical- and patient-reported factors with use of CPM.

RESULTS

Among patients who were untested or who received negative test results, having discussed CPM with one's surgeon at the time of diagnosis predicted subsequent CPM. Patients who were not candidates for breast-conserving surgery and those with higher levels of cancer-specific intrusive thoughts were also more likely to obtain a CPM.

CONCLUSION

The strongest predictors of CPM in this population were objective clinical factors and discussion with providers. However, baseline psychosocial factors were also independently related to the receipt of CPM. Thus, although CPM decisions are largely guided by relevant clinical factors, it is important to attend to psychosocial factors when counseling newly diagnosed breast cancer patients about treatment options.

摘要

目的

最近的趋势表明,新诊断出乳腺癌的患者,尤其是那些 BRCA1/2 基因存在致病性变异的患者,越来越多地选择进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)。然而,检测结果为阴性或选择不进行检测的患者中 CPM 的比率却出人意料地高。我们旨在确定此类患者在乳腺癌诊断后接受 CPM 的患者预测因素。

方法

作为快速基因咨询和检测与常规护理的随机对照试验的一部分,乳腺癌患者在诊断后 6 周内并在进行确定性手术之前完成了基线调查。分析集中在选择不进行检测(n=136)或接受 BRCA1/2 检测阴性结果的患者(n=149)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估社会人口统计学、临床和患者报告的因素与 CPM 使用之间的关联。

结果

在未接受检测或接受阴性检测结果的患者中,在诊断时与外科医生讨论过 CPM 与随后的 CPM 相关。无法进行保乳手术的患者和癌症特异性侵入性思维水平较高的患者更有可能获得 CPM。

结论

在该人群中,CPM 的最强预测因素是客观的临床因素和与提供者的讨论。然而,基线心理社会因素也与 CPM 的接受独立相关。因此,尽管 CPM 决策主要由相关的临床因素指导,但在为新诊断的乳腺癌患者提供治疗选择咨询时,关注心理社会因素很重要。