Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05515-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Recent trends indicate increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, particularly those who test positive for a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1/2 genes. However, the rate of CPM among patients who test negative or choose not to be tested is surprisingly high. We aimed to identify patient predictors of CPM following breast cancer diagnosis among such patients.
As part of a randomized controlled trial of rapid genetic counseling and testing vs. usual care, breast cancer patients completed a baseline survey within 6 weeks of diagnosis and before definitive surgery. Analyses focused on patients who opted against testing (n = 136) or who received negative BRCA1/2 test results (n = 149). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the associations between sociodemographic, clinical- and patient-reported factors with use of CPM.
Among patients who were untested or who received negative test results, having discussed CPM with one's surgeon at the time of diagnosis predicted subsequent CPM. Patients who were not candidates for breast-conserving surgery and those with higher levels of cancer-specific intrusive thoughts were also more likely to obtain a CPM.
The strongest predictors of CPM in this population were objective clinical factors and discussion with providers. However, baseline psychosocial factors were also independently related to the receipt of CPM. Thus, although CPM decisions are largely guided by relevant clinical factors, it is important to attend to psychosocial factors when counseling newly diagnosed breast cancer patients about treatment options.
最近的趋势表明,新诊断出乳腺癌的患者,尤其是那些 BRCA1/2 基因存在致病性变异的患者,越来越多地选择进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)。然而,检测结果为阴性或选择不进行检测的患者中 CPM 的比率却出人意料地高。我们旨在确定此类患者在乳腺癌诊断后接受 CPM 的患者预测因素。
作为快速基因咨询和检测与常规护理的随机对照试验的一部分,乳腺癌患者在诊断后 6 周内并在进行确定性手术之前完成了基线调查。分析集中在选择不进行检测(n=136)或接受 BRCA1/2 检测阴性结果的患者(n=149)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估社会人口统计学、临床和患者报告的因素与 CPM 使用之间的关联。
在未接受检测或接受阴性检测结果的患者中,在诊断时与外科医生讨论过 CPM 与随后的 CPM 相关。无法进行保乳手术的患者和癌症特异性侵入性思维水平较高的患者更有可能获得 CPM。
在该人群中,CPM 的最强预测因素是客观的临床因素和与提供者的讨论。然而,基线心理社会因素也与 CPM 的接受独立相关。因此,尽管 CPM 决策主要由相关的临床因素指导,但在为新诊断的乳腺癌患者提供治疗选择咨询时,关注心理社会因素很重要。