• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。

Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.

机构信息

Breast Services Section, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037
PMID:29360614
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the advent of multigene panel testing for breast cancer patients, germline mutations with unknown association with cancer risk, known as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), are being increasingly identified. Some studies have shown higher rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM) in these patients, despite lack of evidence to support this intervention. We analyzed surgical choices in patients who were identified to have VUS.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review was performed of patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated at a single institution after multigene panel tests became available (September 1, 2013 to February 28, 2017). Rates of genetic testing, results of testing, and surgical decision making were evaluated. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 477 triple-negative breast cancer patients identified; 331 met established criteria for genetic testing and 226 (68.3%) underwent genetic testing (multigene panel, n = 130 and BRCA1/2 testing, n = 96). All of them received risk-appropriate genetic counseling and follow-up. Of these, 29 (12.8%) patients had pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 (Mut+), 42 (18.6%) had VUS (VUS+), and 155 (68.6%) had no mutations identified (Mut-). Variants of uncertain significance in 6 of 42 patients (14.3%) were later reclassified as normal variants. Eighty-eight percent of Mut+ patients underwent CPM compared with 20.1% of Mut- and 21.4% of VUS+ patients (p < 0.001 for both). Rates of CPM were not significantly different between VUS+ and Mut- (p = 0.37). Multigene panel testing detected pathogenic mutations in non-breast cancer-associated genes in 6 patients, with significant management implications.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with risk-appropriate genetic counseling, detection of VUS did not lead to excessive CPM in this cohort of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Furthermore, panel testing detected mutations in non-breast cancer-associated genes, which had significant implications on management and outcomes.

摘要

背景

随着多基因panel 检测在乳腺癌患者中的应用,越来越多的种系突变被发现,这些突变与癌症风险相关,但目前尚不清楚其意义,被称为意义未明的变异(VUS)。一些研究表明,这些患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)发生率更高,尽管缺乏支持这种干预的证据。我们分析了在单中心接受多基因panel 检测的三阴性乳腺癌患者的手术选择。

研究设计

对 2013 年 9 月 1 日至 2017 年 2 月 28 日期间在一家机构接受治疗的三阴性乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了基因检测的比例、检测结果和手术决策。采用卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验比较分类变量。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共确定了 477 例三阴性乳腺癌患者;331 例符合基因检测的既定标准,226 例(68.3%)接受了基因检测(多基因 panel 检测 n=130 例,BRCA1/2 检测 n=96 例)。所有患者均接受了风险适当的遗传咨询和随访。其中,29 例(12.8%)患者的 BRCA1/2 或 PALB2 存在致病性突变(Mut+),42 例(18.6%)患者存在意义未明的变异(VUS+),155 例(68.6%)患者未发现突变(Mut-)。42 例患者中的 6 例(14.3%)的意义未明的变异后来被重新分类为正常变异。与 Mut-和 VUS+患者相比,88%的 Mut+患者接受了 CPM,而 Mut-和 VUS+患者分别为 20.1%和 21.4%(两者均 p<0.001)。VUS+与 Mut-患者的 CPM 发生率无显著差异(p=0.37)。多基因 panel 检测在 6 例患者中发现了非乳腺癌相关基因的致病性突变,对管理有重要意义。

结论

在这组三阴性乳腺癌患者中,与风险适当的遗传咨询相结合,VUS 的检测并未导致 CPM 过度增加。此外,panel 检测还发现了非乳腺癌相关基因的突变,这对管理和结果有重大影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Multigene Panel Testing Detects Equal Rates of Pathogenic BRCA1/2 Mutations and has a Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Limited BRCA1/2 Analysis Alone in Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer.多基因检测面板检测出的致病性BRCA1/2突变率相同,与仅对有遗传性乳腺癌风险的患者进行有限的BRCA1/2分析相比,具有更高的诊断率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3282-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4754-2. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate and predictive factors among patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer.接受遗传性癌症多基因面板检测的乳腺癌患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术率及预测因素。
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2718-2726. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1519. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Clinical Decision-Making in Patients with Variant of Uncertain Significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 基因突变意义不明患者的临床决策
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3067-3072. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5959-3. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
5
Influence of germline test results on surgical decision making in women with invasive breast cancer.种系检测结果对浸润性乳腺癌女性手术决策的影响。
Cancer Genet. 2022 Aug;266-267:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Clinical Management of Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer with Variants of Uncertain Significance in the Era of Multigene Panel Testing.在多基因 panel 检测时代具有不确定意义的变异的遗传性乳腺癌风险患者的临床管理。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3389-3396. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07595-2. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Association of Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Bilateral Disease.中度风险乳腺癌基因与对侧预防性乳房切除术和双侧疾病的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):6990-6999. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14141-8. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
8
Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Undergo Multigene Panel Testing.多基因 panel 检测后的乳腺癌患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的风险
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4613-4621. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08889-6. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
What made her give up her breasts: a qualitative study on decisional considerations for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing.是什么促使她切除乳房:一项关于接受BRCA1/2基因检测的乳腺癌幸存者对侧预防性乳房切除术决策考量的定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2241-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.2241.
10
Association Between Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Multiethnic Women Diagnosed With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌基因检测与多民族早期乳腺癌女性行对侧预防性乳房切除术的相关性研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):e472-e483. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00322. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological and health behaviour outcomes following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: a mini-review of the literature.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险多基因检测后的心理和健康行为结果:文献综述
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 22;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00229-x.
2
Timely cancer genetic counseling and testing for young women with breast cancer: impact on surgical decision-making for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.及时为年轻乳腺癌女性提供癌症遗传咨询和检测:对降低对侧风险的预防性乳房切除术手术决策的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06619-y. Epub 2022 May 21.
3
Multi-Gene Testing Overview with a Clinical Perspective in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
多基因检测概述——从临床角度看转移性三阴性乳腺癌。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 1;22(13):7154. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137154.
4
Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.遗传性癌症中意义不明的变异个体的临床管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Genet. 2021 Aug;100(2):119-131. doi: 10.1111/cge.13966. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受多基因检测或基因组测序的意义未明变异体的临床和心理结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):22-33. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Undergo Multigene Panel Testing.多基因 panel 检测后的乳腺癌患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的风险
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4613-4621. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08889-6. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in genetically high risk newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.遗传性高危初诊乳腺癌患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05515-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Cases in Precision Medicine: The Role of Tumor and Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer Management.精准医学案例:肿瘤和种系基因检测在乳腺癌管理中的作用。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 17;171(12):925-930. doi: 10.7326/M18-2417. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Evolving indications and long-term oncological outcomes of risk-reducing bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy.保乳术后即刻乳房重建的适应证变化和长期肿瘤学结果。
BJS Open. 2018 Nov 26;3(2):169-173. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50117. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients.加拿大基因医疗保健专业人员对与患者讨论自费选项的态度。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):e00572. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.572. Epub 2019 Feb 2.