• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟11个国家医院实施用药安全措施的促进因素和障碍

Facilitators and barriers in implementing medication safety practices across hospitals within 11 European Union countries.

作者信息

Linden-Lahti Carita, Holmström Anna-Riia, Pennanen Pirjo, Airaksinen Marja

机构信息

MSc. Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Pharmacy; & Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki.Finland

PhD. Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Pharmacy; & Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki.Finland.

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1583. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1583. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1583
PMID:31897250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6935546/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study was carried out as part of the European Network for Patient Safety (EUNetPas) project in 2008-2010.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate facilitators and barriers in implementation process of selected medication safety practices across hospitals within European Union countries.

METHODS

This was an implementation study of seven selected medication safety practices in 55 volunteering hospitals of 11 European Union (EU) member states. The selected practices were two different versions of medicine bed dispensation; safety vest; discharge medication list for patients; medication reconciliation at patient discharge; medication reconciliation at patient admission and patient discharge, and sleep card. The participating hospitals submitted an evaluation report describing the implementation process of a chosen practice in their organisation. The reports were analysed with inductive content analysis to identify general and practice-specific facilitators and barriers to the practice implementation.

RESULTS

Altogether 75 evaluation reports were submitted from 55 hospitals in 11 EU member states. Implementation of the medication safety practices was challenging and more time consuming than expected. The major reported challenge was to change the work process because of the new practice. General facilitators for successful implementation were existence of safety culture, national guidelines and projects, expert support, sufficient resources, electronic patient records, interdisciplinary cooperation and clinical pharmacy services supporting the practice implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The key for the successful implementation of a medication safety practice is to select the right practice for the right problem, in the right setting and with sufficient resources in an organization with a safety culture.

摘要

背景

该研究作为欧洲患者安全网络(EUNetPas)项目的一部分,于2008 - 2010年开展。

目的

调查欧盟国家各医院在选定药物安全实践实施过程中的促进因素和障碍。

方法

这是一项针对11个欧盟成员国55家志愿医院的7项选定药物安全实践的实施研究。选定的实践包括两种不同版本的病床发药;安全背心;患者出院用药清单;患者出院时的用药核对;患者入院和出院时的用药核对,以及睡眠卡。参与医院提交了一份评估报告,描述其组织中选定实践的实施过程。通过归纳性内容分析对报告进行分析,以确定实践实施的一般和特定实践的促进因素和障碍。

结果

来自11个欧盟成员国55家医院共提交了75份评估报告。药物安全实践的实施具有挑战性,且比预期更耗时。报告的主要挑战是由于新实践而改变工作流程。成功实施的一般促进因素包括存在安全文化、国家指南和项目、专家支持、充足资源、电子病历、跨学科合作以及支持实践实施的临床药学服务。

结论

成功实施药物安全实践的关键是在具有安全文化、资源充足的合适环境中,为正确的问题选择正确的实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/dfb2e13ec0b3/pharmpract-17-1583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/2e6dae43c004/pharmpract-17-1583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/bc32c4091d5e/pharmpract-17-1583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/dfb2e13ec0b3/pharmpract-17-1583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/2e6dae43c004/pharmpract-17-1583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/bc32c4091d5e/pharmpract-17-1583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6051/6935546/dfb2e13ec0b3/pharmpract-17-1583-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers in implementing medication safety practices across hospitals within 11 European Union countries.欧盟11个国家医院实施用药安全措施的促进因素和障碍
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1583. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1583. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
2
Implementation and sustainability of a medication reconciliation toolkit: A mixed methods evaluation.实施和可持续性的药物重整工具包:混合方法评价。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jul 7;77(14):1135-1143. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa136.
3
Medication reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge: insufficient knowledge, unclear task reallocation and lack of collaboration as major barriers to medication safety.入院和出院时的用药重整:用药安全的主要障碍是知识不足、任务分工不明确以及协作缺乏。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 21;12:170. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-170.
4
Barriers and facilitators of medicines reconciliation at transitions of care in Ireland - a qualitative study.爱尔兰医疗过渡期药品核对的障碍和促进因素 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 23;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01188-9.
5
Barriers and facilitators of medication reconciliation processes for recently discharged patients from community pharmacists' perspectives.从社区药剂师的角度看近期出院患者药物重整流程的障碍与促进因素
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):517-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
6
The Rural VA Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (R-VA-MARQUIS).农村退伍军人事务部多中心药物重整质量改进研究(R-VA-MARQUIS)。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jan 8;77(2):128-137. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz275.
7
Understanding the implementation, impact and sustainable use of an electronic pharmacy referral service at hospital discharge: A qualitative evaluation from a sociotechnical perspective.从社会技术角度理解电子药房转介服务在出院时的实施、影响和可持续利用:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 22;16(12):e0261153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261153. eCollection 2021.
8
Implementing a sustainable medication reconciliation process in Australian hospitals: The World Health Organization High 5s project.在澳大利亚医院实施可持续的用药核对流程:世界卫生组织“高5”项目
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Mar;16(3):290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS).多中心药物重整质量改进研究(MARQUIS)的原理和设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 25;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-230.
10
Assessing the knowledge, perception and practices of physicians and pharmacists towards medication reconciliation in Kuwait governmental hospitals: a cross-sectional study.评估科威特政府医院医生和药剂师在药物重整方面的知识、认知和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e027395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027395.

引用本文的文献

1
Little patients, large risks: An overview on patient safety management in pediatrics settings.小患者,大风险:儿科环境中患者安全管理概述
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 16;10:919710. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.919710. eCollection 2022.
2
Healthcare professionals' perceptions on medication communication challenges and solutions - text mining and manual content analysis - cross-sectional study.医疗保健专业人员对药物沟通挑战及解决方案的看法 - 文本挖掘和手动内容分析 - 横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07227-0.
3
Barriers and facilitators of medicines reconciliation at transitions of care in Ireland - a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care.药物重整对改善医疗转接的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):CD010791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010791.pub2.
2
Beyond Medication Reconciliation: The Correct Medication List.超越用药核对:正确的用药清单。
JAMA. 2017 May 23;317(20):2057-2058. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4628.
3
The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science.将科学转化为行动的斗争:实施科学的基础概念。
爱尔兰医疗过渡期药品核对的障碍和促进因素 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 23;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01188-9.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):117-126. doi: 10.1111/jep.12741. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
4
Effectiveness of a 'Do not interrupt' bundled intervention to reduce interruptions during medication administration: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study.“不打断”捆绑干预措施减少给药期间中断的效果:一项集群随机对照可行性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):734-742. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006123. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Barriers to reporting medication errors and near misses among nurses: A systematic review.护士报告用药错误和接近差错障碍的研究:系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:162-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Pharmacy-led medication reconciliation programmes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医院转诊时由药房主导的用药核对计划:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Apr;41(2):128-44. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12364. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.非专业人士实施科学概论。
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9.
8
How to make medication error reporting systems work--Factors associated with their successful development and implementation.如何使用药错误报告系统发挥作用——与它们成功开发和实施相关的因素。
Health Policy. 2015 Aug;119(8):1046-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?哪些语境特征可能是患者安全实践干预有效性的重要决定因素?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):611-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success.了解改进的条件:研究发现哪些影响因素会影响改进的成功。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i18-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955.