HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 23;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01188-9.
Medication error at transitions of care is common. The implementation of medicines reconciliation processes to improve this issue has been recommended by many regulatory and safety organisations. The aim of this study was to gain insight from healthcare professionals on the barriers and facilitators to the medicines reconciliation implementation process.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Ireland with a wide range of healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved with medicines reconciliation at transitions of care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an adaptation of a combined theoretical framework of Grol, Cabana and Sluisveld to classify the barriers and facilitators to implementation of medicines reconciliation.
Thirty-five participants were interviewed, including eleven community pharmacists (CPs), eight hospital pharmacists (HPs), nine hospital consultants (HCs), five general practitioners (GPs), and two non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs). Themes were categorized into barriers and facilitators. Barriers included resistance from existing professional cultures, staff interest and training, poor communication and minimal information and communications technology (ICT) support. Solutions (facilitators) suggested included supporting effective multidisciplinary teams, greater involvement of pharmacists in medicines reconciliation, ICT solutions (linked prescribing databases, decision support systems) and increased funding to provide additional (e.g. admission and discharge reconciliation) and more advanced services (e.g. community pharmacist delivered medicines use review).
Medicines reconciliation is advocated as a solution to the known problem of medication error at transitions of care. This study identifies the key challenges and potential solutions that policy makers, managers and HCPs should consider when reviewing the practices and processes of medicines reconciliation in their own organisations.
在医疗保健交接过程中,用药错误很常见。许多监管和安全组织建议实施药物重整流程来改善这一问题。本研究旨在深入了解医疗保健专业人员在药物重整实施过程中面临的障碍和促进因素。
在爱尔兰,对涉及医疗保健交接过程中药物重整的各类医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行了半结构化访谈。采用 Grol、Cabana 和 Sluisveld 的综合理论框架的改编版,对实施药物重整的障碍和促进因素进行了主题分析。
共采访了 35 名参与者,包括 11 名社区药剂师(CPs)、8 名医院药剂师(HPs)、9 名医院顾问(HCs)、5 名全科医生(GPs)和 2 名非顾问医院医生(NCHDs)。主题分为障碍和促进因素。障碍包括现有专业文化的抵制、员工的兴趣和培训、沟通不畅以及信息和通信技术(ICT)支持不足。建议的解决方案(促进因素)包括支持有效的多学科团队、让药剂师更多地参与药物重整、ICT 解决方案(链接处方数据库、决策支持系统)以及增加资金,以提供额外的(如入院和出院药物重整)和更先进的服务(如社区药剂师提供的药物使用审查)。
药物重整被认为是解决医疗保健交接过程中已知用药错误问题的一种方法。本研究确定了政策制定者、管理者和医疗保健专业人员在审查其组织内的药物重整实践和流程时应考虑的关键挑战和潜在解决方案。