Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Complex of Ourense, Calle Ramon Puga Noguerol, 54, 32005, Ourense, Spain.
Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Aug;22(8):1205-1215. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02267-9. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Over the last 2 decades, the standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy backbone for metastatic colorectal cancer has been complemented by the addition of novel biological agents, achieving impressive increases in 5-year survival rates. Nonetheless, these new combinations have also entailed increases in toxicity, leading to evaluation of de-escalated chemotherapy regimens and "drug holiday" periods in attempts to reduce side effects and optimise quality of life without impairing efficacy. Here, we review the current and emerging evidence for maintenance schedules with chemotherapy and targeted agents, versus continuous treatment after induction treatment, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
在过去的 20 年中,转移性结直肠癌的标准氟嘧啶类化疗骨干已通过添加新型生物制剂得到补充,从而使 5 年生存率显著提高。尽管如此,这些新组合也带来了毒性的增加,导致了降阶化疗方案的评估和“药物假期”的出现,试图减少副作用并优化生活质量,而不影响疗效。在这里,我们回顾了转移性结直肠癌患者中,与诱导治疗后持续治疗相比,化疗和靶向药物维持治疗与间歇治疗的现有和新兴证据。