Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
II. Medical Clinic, Department for Oncology, Hematology, BMT with Section Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 2;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2.
The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then design suitable implementation strategies which will be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of a PRO measure assessment in inpatient and outpatient cancer routine care.
During the preparation phase, interviews with oncological patients (N = 28) and medical staff (N = 4) as well as focus groups with medical staff (N = 18) across five different departments caring for cancer patients were conducted. On the basis of these, qualitative content analysis revealed relevant barriers and facilitators for implementation of PROs in cancer care. Subsequently, implementation strategies and a model of implementation were developed. In the study phase, implementation strategies will be evaluated based on nine different implementation outcomes in five different oncological clinics. Evaluation of the implementation process will take place during three months in each clinic and data will be conducted pre, while and post implementation of the PRO measure. Therefore a sample size of 60 participants of whom 30 staff members and 30 participants will be questioned using existing and newly developed implementation outcome evaluation instruments.
Key to improving the effectiveness of PRO assessment in the time-critical clinical environment is the utilization of easy-to-use, electronic PRO questionnaires directly linked to patients' records thereby improving consideration of PROs in patient care. In order to validate the effectiveness of this implementation process further, an evaluation parallel to implementation following an observational study design with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted. This study could contribute to the development of adequate evaluation processes of implementation of PROs to foster sustainable integration of PRO measures into routine cancer care.
This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/).
患者报告结局(PROs)在临床常规中的成功实施面临许多挑战,首先是患者护理过程中对此缺乏考虑。本研究的目的将首先确定相关的障碍和促进因素,然后设计合适的实施策略,这些策略将被评估,以提高在住院和门诊癌症常规护理中评估 PRO 措施的有效性。
在准备阶段,对 28 名肿瘤患者和 4 名医务人员以及 18 名来自 5 个不同科室的医务人员进行了焦点小组访谈。在此基础上,进行了定性内容分析,揭示了在癌症护理中实施 PRO 的相关障碍和促进因素。随后,制定了实施策略和实施模型。在研究阶段,将根据 5 个不同肿瘤诊所的 9 个不同实施结果评估实施策略。在每个诊所的 3 个月内,将对实施过程进行评估,并在实施 PRO 措施之前、期间和之后对数据进行分析。因此,将对 60 名参与者进行抽样,其中 30 名工作人员和 30 名参与者将使用现有的和新开发的实施结果评估工具进行询问。
在时间紧迫的临床环境中提高 PRO 评估有效性的关键是利用易于使用的、直接与患者记录相关的电子 PRO 问卷,从而提高对患者护理中 PRO 的重视。为了进一步验证实施过程的有效性,将在观察性研究设计中并行进行评估,采用混合方法。这项研究有助于制定适当的实施评估过程,以促进将 PRO 措施可持续地纳入常规癌症护理。
本研究在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/y7xce/)上注册。