Suppr超能文献

在姑息治疗临床实践中实施患者报告的结局指标:促进因素和障碍的系统评价

Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers.

作者信息

Antunes Bárbara, Harding Richard, Higginson Irene J

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):158-75. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491619. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patient-reported outcome measures have been developed in the past two decades, playing an increasingly important role in palliative care. However, their routine use in practice has been slow and difficult to implement.

AIM

To systematically identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in different palliative care settings for routine practice, and to generate evidence-based recommendations, to inform the implementation process in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase and British Nursing Index were systematically searched from 1985. Hand searching of reference lists for all included articles and relevant review articles was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 3863 articles were screened. Of these, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. First, data were integrated in the main themes: facilitators, barriers and lessons learned. Second, each main theme was grouped into either five or six categories. Finally, recommendations for implementation on outcome measures at management, health-care professional and patient levels were generated for three different points in time: preparation, implementation and assessment/improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful implementation of patient-reported outcome measures should be tailored by identifying and addressing potential barriers according to setting. Having a coordinator throughout the implementation process seems to be key. Ongoing cognitive and emotional processes of each individual should be taken into consideration during changes. The educational component prior to the implementation is crucial. This could promote ownership and correct use of the measure by clinicians, potentially improving practice and the quality of care provided through patient-reported outcome measure data use in clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中开发了许多患者报告结局测量工具,它们在姑息治疗中发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,它们在实际中的常规使用进展缓慢且难以实施。

目的

系统地识别在不同姑息治疗环境中实施患者报告结局测量工具以用于常规实践的促进因素和障碍,并生成基于证据的建议,为临床实践中的实施过程提供参考。

设计

系统文献综述和叙述性综合分析。

数据来源

从1985年开始对Medline、PsycInfo、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、Embase和英国护理索引进行系统检索。对所有纳入文章的参考文献列表和相关综述文章进行手工检索。

结果

共筛选出3863篇文章。其中,31篇文章符合纳入标准。首先,数据整合为主要主题:促进因素、障碍和经验教训。其次,每个主要主题分为五到六个类别。最后,针对管理、医疗保健专业人员和患者层面在三个不同时间点(准备、实施和评估/改进)实施结局测量工具提出了建议。

结论

患者报告结局测量工具的成功实施应根据具体情况识别并解决潜在障碍,进行量身定制。在整个实施过程中有一名协调员似乎是关键。在变革过程中应考虑每个人持续的认知和情感过程。实施前的教育部分至关重要。这可以促进临床医生对测量工具的自主所有权和正确使用,有可能通过在临床决策中使用患者报告结局测量数据来改善实践和所提供的护理质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验