• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者症状监测数字健康干预措施的适应性与评估:混合方法试点实施研究

Adaptation and Evaluation of a Symptom-Monitoring Digital Health Intervention for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Pilot Mixed-Methods Implementation Study.

作者信息

Biran Noa, Anthony Kouyaté Robin, Yucel Emre, McGovern Gillian E, Schoenthaler Antoinette M, Durling Olivia G, Unawane Rashmi, Schutt Andrew, Panjabi Sumeet

机构信息

Division of Multiple Myeloma, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States.

Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 17;4(11):e18982. doi: 10.2196/18982.

DOI:10.2196/18982
PMID:33200997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is a bone marrow cancer that requires systemic treatment, which often results in severe symptom burden. Recent studies have found that electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) interventions implemented in the clinic setting have had positive outcomes for other oncology populations. Evidence of the efficacy of a similar approach is lacking for patients with RRMM.

OBJECTIVE

Recent recommendations for digital health interventions call for the publication of descriptions of iterative development processes in order to improve reproducibility and comparability. This study is an implementation pilot aiming to evaluate the acceptability and appropriateness of an ePRO intervention for patients with RRMM and to explore its impact on clinic workflow.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with RRMM were recruited from the John Theurer Cancer Center in Hackensack, New Jersey. Patients used a mobile app to report on 17 symptoms at 4 sessions, each a week apart. Patients could also report symptoms ad hoc. When reports met predefined thresholds, the clinic was alerted and patients received automated guidance. Study end points were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients (mean age 69.7 years) completed the study. Overall, 83% (30/36) of weekly sessions were completed. Patients found the frequency and time required to complete reporting acceptable. All patients agreed that the app was easy to use and understand. Providers felt the alerts they received required refinement. Patients and providers agreed it would be beneficial for patients to report for longer than 4 weeks. Patients felt that the training they received was adequate but contained too much information for a single session. All patients found the symptoms tracked to be appropriate; providers suggested shortening the list. All patients understood how to use the app for weekly reporting but had confusion about using it ad hoc. Providers felt the ad hoc feature could be removed. Neither patients nor providers viewed the in-app data reports but agreed on their potential value. Patients reported benefitting from symptom reporting through increased awareness of their symptoms. Clinic staff reported that app alerts were too numerous and redundant. They had difficulty responding to alerts within their existing workflow, partially because the data were not integrated into the electronic medical record system.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the intervention was found to be acceptable and appropriate for patients with RRMM. Points of friction integrating the intervention into the clinic workflow were identified. Clinic staff provided recommendations for addressing these issues. Once such modifications are implemented, ePRO data from patients with RRMM could be used to inform and improve clinical research and care. This study underlines the importance of an iterative approach to implementation that includes all stakeholders in order to ensure successful adoption.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/27b0a973afce/formative_v4i11e18982_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/285d7fd94d49/formative_v4i11e18982_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/e27149953626/formative_v4i11e18982_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/27b0a973afce/formative_v4i11e18982_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/285d7fd94d49/formative_v4i11e18982_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/e27149953626/formative_v4i11e18982_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a8/7709004/27b0a973afce/formative_v4i11e18982_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)是一种需要全身治疗的骨髓癌,这通常会导致严重的症状负担。最近的研究发现,在临床环境中实施的电子患者报告结局(ePRO)干预措施对其他肿瘤患者群体产生了积极效果。RRMM患者缺乏类似方法有效性的证据。

目的

最近对数字健康干预措施的建议要求公布迭代开发过程的描述,以提高可重复性和可比性。本研究是一项实施试点,旨在评估RRMM患者对ePRO干预措施的可接受性和适用性,并探讨其对临床工作流程的影响。

方法

从新泽西州哈肯萨克的约翰·图勒癌症中心招募了11名RRMM患者。患者使用移动应用程序在4个疗程中报告17种症状,每个疗程间隔一周。患者也可以临时报告症状。当报告达到预定义阈值时,会向诊所发出警报,患者会收到自动指导。使用定性和定量方法评估研究终点。

结果

共有9名患者(平均年龄69.7岁)完成了研究。总体而言,83%(30/36)的每周疗程完成。患者认为完成报告所需的频率和时间是可以接受的。所有患者都认为该应用程序易于使用和理解。医护人员认为他们收到的警报需要改进。患者和医护人员一致认为,患者报告超过4周会有益处。患者认为他们接受的培训足够,但单次培训包含的信息过多。所有患者都认为跟踪的症状是合适的;医护人员建议缩短列表。所有患者都知道如何使用该应用程序进行每周报告,但对临时使用感到困惑。医护人员认为临时报告功能可以删除。患者和医护人员都没有查看应用程序中的数据报告,但都认可其潜在价值。患者报告称,通过提高对自身症状的认识,从症状报告中受益。诊所工作人员报告称,应用程序警报过多且重复。他们在现有工作流程中难以应对警报,部分原因是数据未集成到电子病历系统中。

结论

总体而言,该干预措施被认为对RRMM患者是可接受的且适用的。确定了将该干预措施整合到临床工作流程中的摩擦点。诊所工作人员提供了解决这些问题的建议。一旦实施此类修改,RRMM患者的ePRO数据可用于为临床研究和护理提供信息并加以改进。本研究强调了采用迭代方法实施的重要性,该方法应包括所有利益相关者,以确保成功采用。

相似文献

1
Adaptation and Evaluation of a Symptom-Monitoring Digital Health Intervention for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Pilot Mixed-Methods Implementation Study.复发性和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者症状监测数字健康干预措施的适应性与评估:混合方法试点实施研究
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 17;4(11):e18982. doi: 10.2196/18982.
2
Health Care Provider Perspectives on the Use of a Digital Behavioral Health App to Support Patients: Qualitative Study.医疗保健提供者对使用数字行为健康应用程序支持患者的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 28;5(9):e28538. doi: 10.2196/28538.
3
A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.手术后出院患者实时电子症状监测系统:一项癌症相关手术的试点研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07027-5.
4
Patient-Reported Factors in Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者治疗满意度的患者报告因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):1479-1487. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0724. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
The Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool: Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile App and Portal to Support Care for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability in Primary Care Settings.电子患者报告结局工具:测试移动应用程序和门户的可用性和可行性,以支持初级保健环境中患有复杂慢性病和残疾的患者的护理。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 2;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5331.
6
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
7
Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial.炎症性疾病患者在先进治疗药物产品(ATMP)篮子试验中电子患者报告结局(ePRO)解决方案的开发和可用性测试。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 9;7(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3.
8
Addressing the unmet needs of women with breast cancer in Mexico: a non-randomised pilot study of the digital ePRO intervention.满足墨西哥乳腺癌女性的未满足需求:数字化电子患者报告结局干预的非随机试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 21;14(6):e087240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087240.
9
The provider perspective: investigating the effect of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal on primary care provider workflow.提供者视角:探究电子患者报告结局(ePRO)移动应用程序和门户对初级保健提供者工作流程的影响。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-164. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000573. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Symptom burden and its functional impact in patients with "symptomatic" relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.症状负担及其对“有症状”复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的功能影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05493-y. Epub 2020 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems and capabilities in cancer care: a systematic review.癌症护理中的电子患者报告结局系统及功能:一项系统综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;7:1560533. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560533. eCollection 2025.
2
Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study.为老年人实施数字体育活动干预:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Aug 21;8:e64953. doi: 10.2196/64953.
3
Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol.患者报告结局(PROs)在肿瘤常规护理中的实施分析:一项观察性研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 2;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2.
2
Functional Status as Measured by Geriatric Assessment Predicts Inferior Survival in Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.老年综合评估测量的功能状态预测老年异基因造血细胞移植受者生存不良。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan;26(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.08.022. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Utilizing the Advances in Digital Health Solutions to Manage Care in Cancer Patients.
推进以患者为中心的癌症护理:电子患者报告结局指标的系统评价
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Sep 25;5:1427712. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1427712. eCollection 2024.
4
The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review.癌症电子患者报告结局系统的优势、劣势、威胁与机遇:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 May 27;10:20552076241257146. doi: 10.1177/20552076241257146. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes.使用电子管理和远程医疗技术在常规癌症临床护理中评估患者报告的结果:改善健康结果的潜在机制的实际综合分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e48483. doi: 10.2196/48483.
6
Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review.电子前瞻性监测模型在癌症护理中的实施:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01265-4.
7
Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review.使用实施研究综合框架评估癌症护理中移动健康应用程序采用的障碍和促进因素:范围综述文献
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Mar 30;9:e42092. doi: 10.2196/42092.
8
Association of patient activity bio-profiles with health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a prospective observational cohort study.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者的患者活动生物特征与健康相关生活质量的关联:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Feb 27;57:101854. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101854. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Assessing Subhealth Using a Mobile Health Management App (MibyeongBogam) in Early Middle-Aged Koreans: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用移动健康管理应用程序(MibyeongBogam)评估早期中年韩国人亚健康的可行性和有效性:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e27455. doi: 10.2196/27455.
利用数字健康解决方案的进展来管理癌症患者的护理。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jul-Sep;6(3):234-237. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_72_18.
4
Convenience, satisfaction, health-related quality of life of once-weekly 70 mg/m vs. twice-weekly 27 mg/m carfilzomib (randomized A.R.R.O.W. study).每周一次 70mg/m2 与每周两次 27mg/m2 卡非佐米在便利性、满意度和健康相关生活质量方面的比较(随机 A.R.R.O.W. 研究)。
Leukemia. 2019 Dec;33(12):2934-2946. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0480-2. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.用于患者报告和管理癌症治疗副作用的电子系统:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 24;21(1):e10875. doi: 10.2196/10875.
6
A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts.面向实施专家的以用户为中心的设计策略词汇表。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1057-1064. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby119.
7
User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation.以用户为中心的心理社会干预开发与实施设计
Clin Psychol (New York). 2016 Jun;23(2):180-200. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12154. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
Leveraging Implementation Science to Improve Cancer Care Delivery and Patient Outcomes.利用实施科学改善癌症护理服务与患者治疗效果。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Aug;13(8):523-529. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.024729. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.一项评估常规癌症治疗期间症状监测的患者报告结局的试验的总生存结果。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.
10
Methods for Implementing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials.癌症临床试验中有症状不良事件的患者报告结局(PRO)测量的实施与报告方法
Clin Ther. 2016 Apr;38(4):821-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 2.