Suppr超能文献

老年受试者多中心臭氧研究(MOSES):第1部分。低浓度臭氧暴露对呼吸和心血管结局的影响。

Multicenter Ozone Study in oldEr Subjects (MOSES): Part 1. Effects of Exposure to Low Concentrations of Ozone on Respiratory and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

作者信息

Frampton M W, Balmes J R, Bromberg P A, Stark P, Arjomandi M, Hazucha M J, Rich D Q, Hollenbeck-Pringle D, Dagincourt N, Alexis N, Ganz P, Zareba W, Costantini M G

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2017 Jun;2017(192, Pt 1):1-107.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to air pollution is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Most of the evidence supporting an association between air pollution and adverse cardiovascular effects involves exposure to particulate matter (PM). To date, little attention has been paid to acute cardiovascular responses to ozone, in part due to the notion that ozone causes primarily local effects on lung function, which are the basis for the current ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). There is evidence from a few epidemiological studies of adverse health effects of chronic exposure to ambient ozone, including increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease. However, in contrast to the well-established association between ambient ozone and various nonfatal adverse respiratory effects, the observational evidence for impacts of acute (previous few days) increases in ambient ozone levels on total cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed.

UNLABELLED

Ozone is a prototypic oxidant gas that reacts with constituents of the respiratory tract lining fluid to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can overwhelm antioxidant defenses and cause local oxidative stress. Pathways by which ozone could cause cardiovascular dysfunction include alterations in autonomic balance, systemic inflammation, and oxidative stress. These initial responses could lead ultimately to arrhythmias, endothelial dysfunction, acute arterial vasoconstriction, and procoagulant activity. Individuals with impaired antioxidant defenses, such as those with the null variant of glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1), may be at increased risk for acute health effects.

UNLABELLED

The Multicenter Ozone Study in oldEr Subjects (MOSES) was a controlled human exposure study designed to evaluate whether short-term exposure of older, healthy individuals to ambient levels of ozone induces acute cardiovascular responses. The study was designed to test the a priori hypothesis that short-term exposure to ambient levels of ozone would induce acute cardiovascular responses through the following mechanisms: autonomic imbalance, systemic inflammation, and development of a prothrombotic vascular state. We also postulated a priori the confirmatory hypothesis that exposure to ozone would induce airway inflammation, lung injury, and lung function decrements. Finally, we postulated the secondary hypotheses that ozone-induced acute cardiovascular responses would be associated with: (a) increased systemic oxidative stress and lung effects, and (b) the GSTM1-null genotype.

METHODS

The study was conducted at three clinical centers with a separate Data Coordinating and Analysis Center (DCAC) using a common protocol. All procedures were approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of the participating centers. Healthy volunteers 55 to 70 years of age were recruited. Consented participants who successfully completed the screening and training sessions were enrolled in the study. All three clinical centers adhered to common standard operating procedures (SOPs) and used common tracking and data forms. Each subject was scheduled to participate in a total of 11 visits: screening visit, training visit, and three sets of exposure visits, each consisting of the pre-exposure day, the exposure day, and the post-exposure day. The subjects spent the night in a nearby hotel the night of the pre-exposure day.

UNLABELLED

On exposure days, the subjects were exposed for three hours in random order to 0 ppb ozone (clean air), 70 ppb ozone, and 120 ppm ozone, alternating 15 minutes of moderate exercise with 15 minutes of rest. A suite of cardiovascular and pulmonary endpoints was measured on the day before, the day of, and up to 22 hours after, each exposure. The endpoints included: (1) electrocardiographic changes (continuous Holter monitoring: heart rate variability [HRV], repolarization, and arrhythmia); (2) markers of inflammation and oxidative stress (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], 8-isoprostane, nitrotyrosine, and P-selectin); (3) vascular function measures (blood pressure [BP], flow-mediated dilatation [FMD] of the brachial artery, and endothelin-1 [ET-1]; (4) venous blood markers of platelet activation, thrombosis, and microparticle-associated tissue factor activity (MP-TFA); (5) pulmonary function (spirometry); (6) markers of airway epithelial cell injury (increases in plasma club cell protein 16 [CC16] and sputum total protein); and (7) markers of lung inflammation in sputum (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMN], IL-6, interleukin-8 [IL-8], and tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α]). Sputum was collected only at 22 hours after exposure.

UNLABELLED

The analyses of the continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, the brachial artery ultrasound (BAU) images, and the blood and sputum samples were carried out by core laboratories. The results of all analyses were submitted directly to the DCAC.

UNLABELLED

The variables analyzed in the statistical models were represented as changes from pre-exposure to post-exposure (post-exposure minus pre-exposure). Mixed-effect linear models were used to evaluate the impact of exposure to ozone on the prespecified primary and secondary continuous outcomes. Site and time (when multiple measurements were taken) were controlled for in the models. Three separate interaction models were constructed for each outcome: ozone concentration by subject sex; ozone concentration by subject age; and ozone concentration by subject GSTM1 status (null or sufficient). Because of the issue of multiple comparisons, the statistical significance threshold was set a priori at < 0.01.

RESULTS

Subject recruitment started in June 2012, and the first subject was randomized on July 25, 2012. Subject recruitment ended on December 31, 2014, and testing of all subjects was completed by April 30, 2015. A total of 87 subjects completed all three exposures. The mean age was 59.9 ± 4.5 years, 60% of the subjects were female, 88% were white, and 57% were GSTM1 null. Mean baseline body mass index (BMI), BP, cholesterol (total and low-density lipoprotein), and lung function were all within the normal range.

UNLABELLED

We found no significant effects of ozone exposure on any of the primary or secondary endpoints for autonomic function, repolarization, ST segment change, or arrhythmia. Ozone exposure also did not cause significant changes in the primary endpoints for systemic inflammation (CRP) and vascular function (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and FMD) or secondary endpoints for systemic inflammation and oxidative stress (IL-6, P-selectin, and 8-isoprostane). Ozone did cause changes in two secondary endpoints: a significant increase in plasma ET-1 ( = 0.008) and a marginally significant decrease in nitrotyrosine ( = 0.017). Lastly, ozone exposure did not affect the primary prothrombotic endpoints (MP-TFA and monocyte-platelet conjugate count) or any secondary markers of prothrombotic vascular status (platelet activation, circulating microparticles [MPs], von Willebrand factor [vWF], or fibrinogen.).

UNLABELLED

Although our hypothesis focused on possible acute cardiovascular effects of exposure to low levels of ozone, we recognized that the initial effects of inhaled ozone involve the lower airways. Therefore, we looked for: (a) changes in lung function, which are known to occur during exposure to ozone and are maximal at the end of exposure; and (b) markers of airway injury and inflammation. We found an increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) after exposure to 0 ppb ozone, likely due to the effects of exercise. The FEV₁ increased significantly 15 minutes after 0 ppb exposure (85 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 106; < 0.001), and remained significantly increased from pre-exposure at 22 hours (45 mL; 95% CI, 26 to 64; < 0.001). The increase in FVC followed a similar pattern. The increase in FEV₁ and FVC were attenuated in a dose-response manner by exposure to 70 and 120 ppb ozone. We also observed a significant ozone-induced increase in the percentage of sputum PMN 22 hours after exposure at 120 ppb compared to 0 ppb exposure ( = 0.003). Plasma CC16 also increased significantly after exposure to 120 ppb ( < 0.001). Sputum IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α concentrations were not significantly different after ozone exposure. We found no significant interactions with sex, age, or GSTM1 status regarding the effect of ozone on lung function, percentage of sputum PMN, or plasma CC16.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter clinical study of older healthy subjects, ozone exposure caused concentration-related reductions in lung function and presented evidence for airway inflammation and injury. However, there was no convincing evidence for effects on cardiovascular function. Blood levels of the potent vasoconstrictor, ET-1, increased with ozone exposure (with marginal statistical significance), but there were no effects on BP, FMD, or other markers of vascular function. Blood levels of nitrotyrosine decreased with ozone exposure, the opposite of our hypothesis. Our study does not support acute cardiovascular effects of low-level ozone exposure in healthy older subjects. Inclusion of only healthy older individuals is a major limitation, which may affect the generalizability of our findings. We cannot exclude the possibility of effects with higher ozone exposure concentrations or more prolonged exposure, or the possibility that subjects with underlying vascular disease, such as hypertension or diabetes, would show effects under these conditions.

摘要

引言

空气污染是已确定的心血管疾病发病和死亡的风险因素。大多数支持空气污染与心血管不良影响之间关联的证据都涉及颗粒物(PM)暴露。迄今为止,臭氧对心血管的急性反应很少受到关注,部分原因是认为臭氧主要对肺功能产生局部影响,这也是当前臭氧国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)的依据。有一些流行病学研究表明,长期暴露于环境臭氧会对健康产生不良影响,包括心血管疾病死亡风险增加。然而,与环境臭氧和各种非致命性不良呼吸影响之间已确定的关联不同,关于环境臭氧水平急性(前几天)升高对心血管总死亡率和发病率影响的观察证据并不一致。

未标注

臭氧是一种典型的氧化性气体,它与呼吸道内衬液的成分发生反应,生成活性氧(ROS),这些活性氧会超过抗氧化防御能力,导致局部氧化应激。臭氧导致心血管功能障碍的途径包括自主神经平衡改变、全身炎症和氧化应激。这些初始反应最终可能导致心律失常、内皮功能障碍、急性动脉血管收缩和促凝活性。抗氧化防御受损的个体,如谷胱甘肽S-转移酶μ1(GSTM1)基因缺失变异的个体,可能急性健康效应风险增加。

未标注

老年多中心臭氧研究(MOSES)是一项对照人体暴露研究,旨在评估老年健康个体短期暴露于环境水平的臭氧是否会引发急性心血管反应。该研究旨在检验先验假设,即短期暴露于环境水平的臭氧会通过以下机制引发急性心血管反应:自主神经失衡、全身炎症和血栓前血管状态的发展。我们还先验地提出了验证性假设,即暴露于臭氧会引发气道炎症、肺损伤和肺功能下降。最后,我们提出了次要假设,即臭氧诱导的急性心血管反应将与以下因素相关:(a)全身氧化应激增加和肺部效应,以及(b)GSTM1基因缺失基因型。

方法

该研究在三个临床中心进行,设有一个单独的数据协调与分析中心(DCAC),采用通用方案。所有程序均获得参与中心的机构审查委员会(IRB)批准。招募了55至70岁的健康志愿者。成功完成筛查和培训课程并签署知情同意书的参与者被纳入研究。所有三个临床中心均遵循通用标准操作规程(SOP),并使用通用的跟踪和数据表格。每个受试者计划总共参加11次访视:筛查访视、培训访视以及三组暴露访视,每组访视包括暴露前一天、暴露当天和暴露后一天。受试者在暴露前一天晚上住在附近的酒店。

未标注

在暴露日,受试者以随机顺序分别暴露于0 ppb臭氧(清洁空气)、70 ppb臭氧和120 ppm臭氧中3小时,期间15分钟中等强度运动与15分钟休息交替进行。在每次暴露前一天、暴露当天以及暴露后长达22小时内,测量一系列心血管和肺部终点指标。这些终点指标包括:(1)心电图变化(连续动态心电图监测:心率变异性[HRV]、复极化和心律失常);(2)炎症和氧化应激标志物(C反应蛋白[CRP]、白细胞介素-6[IL-6]、8-异前列腺素、硝基酪氨酸和P-选择素);(3)血管功能指标(血压[BP]、肱动脉血流介导的舒张功能[FMD]和内皮素-1[ET-1]);(4)血小板激活、血栓形成和微粒相关组织因子活性(MP-TFA)的静脉血标志物;(5)肺功能(肺量计);(6)气道上皮细胞损伤标志物(血浆克拉拉细胞蛋白16[CC16]增加和痰液总蛋白);以及(7)痰液中肺部炎症标志物(多形核白细胞[PMN]、IL-6、白细胞介素-8[IL-8]和肿瘤坏死因子-α[TNF-α])。仅在暴露后22小时收集痰液。

未标注

连续心电图监测、肱动脉超声(BAU)图像以及血液和痰液样本的分析由核心实验室进行。所有分析结果直接提交给DCAC。

未标注

统计模型中分析的变量表示为暴露前到暴露后的变化(暴露后减去暴露前)。采用混合效应线性模型评估臭氧暴露对预先指定的主要和次要连续结局的影响。模型中控制了研究地点和时间(进行多次测量时)。针对每个结局构建了三个单独的交互模型:臭氧浓度与受试者性别;臭氧浓度与受试者年龄;以及臭氧浓度与受试者GSTM1状态(缺失或充足)。由于存在多重比较问题,统计显著性阈值预先设定为<0.01。

结果

受试者招募于2012年6月开始,2012年7月25日第一名受试者被随机分组。受试者招募于2014年12月31日结束,所有受试者的测试于2015年4月30日完成。共有87名受试者完成了所有三次暴露。平均年龄为59.9±4.5岁,60%的受试者为女性,88%为白人,57%为GSTM1基因缺失。平均基线体重指数(BMI)、血压、胆固醇(总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白)以及肺功能均在正常范围内

相似文献

3
Do Ambient Ozone or Other Pollutants Modify Effects of Controlled Ozone Exposure on Pulmonary Function?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 May;17(5):563-572. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201908-597OC.
5
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
8
Respiratory Responses to Ozone Exposure. MOSES (The Multicenter Ozone Study in Older Subjects).
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 May 15;197(10):1319-1327. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1613OC.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Ambient ozone and incident diabetes: A prospective analysis in a large cohort of African American women.
Environ Int. 2017 May;102:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
3
Long-Term Exposure to NO2 and Ozone and Hypertension Incidence in the Black Women's Health Study.
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Apr 1;30(4):367-372. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw168.
4
A joint ERS/ATS policy statement: what constitutes an adverse health effect of air pollution? An analytical framework.
Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 11;49(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00419-2016. Print 2017 Jan.
5
Past, present and future concentrations of ground-level ozone and potential impacts on ecosystems and human health in northern Europe.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;576:22-35. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.061. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Mechanisms of the acute effects of inhaled ozone in humans.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Dec;1860(12):2771-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Short-term Exposure to Ozone and Mortality in Subjects With and Without Previous Cardiovascular Disease.
Epidemiology. 2016 Sep;27(5):663-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000520.
8
Repeated ozone exposure exacerbates insulin resistance and activates innate immune response in genetically susceptible mice.
Inhal Toxicol. 2016 Aug;28(9):383-92. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2016.1179373. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Effects of urban fine particulate matter and ozone on HDL functionality.
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016 May 24;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0139-3.
10
Stretching the stress boundary: Linking air pollution health effects to a neurohormonal stress response.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Dec;1860(12):2880-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验