• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有与不患有品行问题的儿童在说谎频率、道德评价和说谎信念方面的差异和相似之处。

Differences and similarities in lying frequency, moral evaluations, and beliefs about lying among children with and without conduct problems.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2X2, Canada.

Child Development Institute, Toronto, Ontario M6E 3V4, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104768. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104768
PMID:31901722
Abstract

The current study examined whether children (6-12 years old) with varying levels of conduct problems differ from those without conduct problems in three key areas: their perceptions of how often other people tell lies, their moral evaluations of truth- and lie-telling in different social contexts, and how often they tell antisocial and prosocial (i.e., "white") lies. Using a continuous measurement of conduct problems, we found that children with greater conduct problems believed that other people tell lies more often compared with children with fewer conduct problems. However, unexpectedly, children's moral evaluations of truth- and lie-telling in antisocial and prosocial contexts did not significantly differ based on conduct problems. Using parent-report methods, we found that children tell more antisocial lies with increasing severity of conduct problems, but they tell prosocial lies at a similar rate regardless of conduct problems. Finally, after grouping children based on level of conduct problems (none, low, or high), we found that children in the group with no conduct problems told more prosocial lies than antisocial lies, but the reverse was found for children in the group with high conduct problems. These findings highlight the importance of considering social context when examining the development of lying in children experiencing conduct problems.

摘要

本研究考察了行为问题程度不同的 6-12 岁儿童在以下三个关键领域与无行为问题的儿童有何不同:他们对他人说谎频率的看法、他们对不同社会情境下诚实和说谎的道德评价,以及他们说谎的频率,包括反社会和亲社会的谎言(即“白色”谎言)。我们使用行为问题的连续测量方法发现,与行为问题较少的儿童相比,行为问题较多的儿童认为其他人说谎的频率更高。然而,出人意料的是,儿童在反社会和亲社会情境下对诚实和说谎的道德评价并不因行为问题而有显著差异。使用父母报告的方法,我们发现随着行为问题严重程度的增加,儿童会说更多的反社会谎言,但无论行为问题如何,他们说亲社会谎言的频率是相似的。最后,我们根据行为问题的程度(无、低或高)对儿童进行分组后发现,无行为问题组的儿童说亲社会谎言多于反社会谎言,但高行为问题组的儿童则相反。这些发现强调了在考察有行为问题的儿童说谎发展时,考虑社会情境的重要性。

相似文献

1
Differences and similarities in lying frequency, moral evaluations, and beliefs about lying among children with and without conduct problems.患有与不患有品行问题的儿童在说谎频率、道德评价和说谎信念方面的差异和相似之处。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104768. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
2
Lie-telling for personal gain in children with and without externalizing behavior problems.为个人利益而说谎的儿童,有和没有外化行为问题的。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jul;219:105385. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105385. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Automated decoding of facial expressions reveals marked differences in children when telling antisocial versus prosocial lies.面部表情的自动解码显示,儿童在讲述反社会谎言和亲社会谎言时存在显著差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:165-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies.儿童在对真话和谎言的选择、分类及评价方面的跨文化差异。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Mar;43(2):278-93. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.278.
5
Relations among lie-telling self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and willingness to tell antisocial lies among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年说谎自我效能感、道德脱离与反社会说谎意愿的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105999. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding.儿童亲社会说谎的预测因素:动机、社会化变量和道德理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):373-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
Carving Pinocchio: Longitudinal examination of children's lying for different goals.《雕刻皮诺曹:儿童为不同目的说谎的纵向研究》
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:34-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
8
Children tell more prosocial lies in favor of in-group than out-group peers.儿童更倾向于为群体内的同伴而非群体外的同伴说更利他的谎言。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Jul;55(7):1428-1439. doi: 10.1037/dev0000721. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
Learning through observing: Effects of modeling truth- and lie-telling on children's honesty.通过观察学习:榜样诚实和说谎对儿童诚实的影响。
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12883. doi: 10.1111/desc.12883. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
A cross-cultural comparison of the relation between children's moral standards of honesty and their lie-telling behavior.儿童诚实道德标准与其说谎行为之间关系的跨文化比较。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Jul;231:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105665. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Stories Can Promote Honesty in Chinese Young Children.道德故事可以促进中国幼儿的诚实品质。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 25;15(6):733. doi: 10.3390/bs15060733.
2
Is childhood lying shaped by callous-unemotional traits or does lie-telling make children more callous-unemotional? A longitudinal between- and within-person perspective.是儿童的冷漠无情特质塑造了他们的说谎行为,还是说谎行为使儿童变得更加冷漠无情?一种跨时间的个体间和个体内视角。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;33(10):3541-3550. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02398-7. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Adult's veracity judgments of Black and White children's statements: the role of perceiver and target race and prejudice-related concerns.
成年人对黑人和白人儿童陈述的真实性判断:感知者和目标种族以及与偏见相关的担忧所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 26;14:1177253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177253. eCollection 2023.
4
An experimental investigation of association between children's lying and behavior problems.儿童说谎与行为问题之间关联的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 22;13:982012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.982012. eCollection 2022.