Zanette Sarah, Hagi Hussein Siham, Malloy Lindsay C
Department of Psychology, Luther College at the University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 26;14:1177253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177253. eCollection 2023.
Seldom has work investigated systematic biases in adults' truth and lie judgments of children's reports. Research demonstrates that adults tend to exhibit a bias toward believing a child is telling the truth, but it is unknown whether this truth bias applies equally to all children. Given the pervasiveness of racial prejudice and anti-Black racism in the United States, the current study examined whether adults are more or less likely to believe a child is telling the truth based on the race of the child (Black or White), the race of the adult perceiver (Black or White), and the perceiver's concerns regarding appearing unprejudiced.
Using an online data-collection platform, 593 Black and White American adults reviewed fictitious vignettes in which a child denied committing a misbehavior at school (e.g., damaging a laptop). The race of the child in the vignette was manipulated using an AI-generated photo of either a Black child or a White child. After reading each story, participants provided a categorical veracity judgment by indicating whether they believed the child in the story was lying (and therefore committed the misdeed) or telling the truth (and was innocent), as well as rated how honest or deceptive the child was being on a continuous scale. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing their internal (personal) and external (normative) motivations to respond in non-prejudiced ways.
Results indicated that systematic racial biases occur in adults' veracity judgments of children's statements. Both Black and White participants exhibited a truth bias in their veracity judgments of Black children, but not when evaluating the deceptiveness of White children. Consistent with the prejudice-related concerns hypothesis, the observed truth bias toward Black children was moderated by individual differences in participants' desire to respond without prejudice and whether those motivations stem from external or internal sources. The current findings present novel evidence regarding racial bias and prejudice-related concerns as potential barriers to making veracity judgments of children's statements and, ultimately, successful lie detection.
很少有研究调查成年人对儿童报告的真假判断中的系统性偏差。研究表明,成年人倾向于表现出相信孩子说真话的偏差,但尚不清楚这种真话偏差是否同样适用于所有儿童。鉴于美国种族偏见和反黑人种族主义的普遍性,本研究考察了成年人基于儿童的种族(黑人或白人)、成年感知者的种族(黑人或白人)以及感知者对表现出无偏见的担忧,是否更有可能或更不可能相信孩子说真话。
使用在线数据收集平台,593名美国黑人和白人成年人查看了虚构的短文,其中一个孩子否认在学校有不当行为(例如,损坏笔记本电脑)。短文中孩子的种族通过人工智能生成的黑人孩子或白人孩子的照片进行操纵。阅读每个故事后,参与者通过表明他们是否相信故事中的孩子在说谎(因此犯了不当行为)或说真话(是无辜的)来提供分类真实性判断,并在连续量表上对孩子的诚实或欺骗程度进行评分。参与者还完成了问卷调查,评估他们以无偏见方式回应的内部(个人)和外部(规范)动机。
结果表明,成年人在对儿童陈述的真实性判断中存在系统性种族偏差。黑人和白人参与者在对黑人儿童的真实性判断中都表现出真话偏差,但在评估白人儿童的欺骗性时则没有。与偏见相关的担忧假设一致,观察到的对黑人儿童的真话偏差受到参与者无偏见回应愿望的个体差异以及这些动机是源于外部还是内部来源的调节。目前的研究结果提供了新的证据,表明种族偏见和与偏见相关的担忧是对儿童陈述进行真实性判断以及最终成功进行谎言检测的潜在障碍。