Suppr超能文献

一切都体现在细节中吗?描述内容与错误识别误差。

Is it all in the details? Description content and false recognition errors.

作者信息

Bays Rebecca Brooke, Foley Mary Ann, Cohen Annelise

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Oglethorpe University, 4484 Peachtree Road, Atlanta, GA, 30319, USA.

Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2020 May;21(2):185-196. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00945-8. Epub 2020 Jan 4.

Abstract

In three experiments, we examined the effect of embellished content on memory errors for thematically related items as well as whether an encoding manipulation, specifically instructions to visualize content, further affects those errors. Using a modified Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants listened to subsets of DRM items embedded within scene descriptions. Some descriptions embellished item connections, weaving them into cohesive scenes. Other descriptions only made general reference to scenes, mentioning the items in list-like format. Listening to more detailed descriptions, compared to general scene references, elicited higher false recognition errors (Experiments 1 and 3). However, when description details varied within the same encoding series, as expected, false recognition errors did not differ significantly (Experiments 2 and 3). Results further suggest that more detailed content was more vividly imagined, providing one possible mechanism for increases in false recognition (Experiment 3). Implications for theoretical discussions of encoding task effects on false recognition errors are discussed.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们研究了润饰后的内容对主题相关项目记忆错误的影响,以及一种编码操作,即具体的可视化内容指令,是否会进一步影响这些错误。使用改良的迪泽-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)范式,参与者听取嵌入场景描述中的DRM项目子集。一些描述润饰了项目之间的联系,将它们编织成连贯的场景。其他描述只是一般性地提及场景,以列表形式提及项目。与一般性的场景提及相比,听取更详细的描述会引发更高的错误识别率(实验1和3)。然而,正如预期的那样,当描述细节在同一编码系列中变化时,错误识别率没有显著差异(实验2和3)。结果进一步表明,更详细的内容能被更生动地想象,这为错误识别率的增加提供了一种可能的机制(实验3)。本文还讨论了编码任务对错误识别错误影响的理论探讨意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验