Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Nov;49(8):1555-1567. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01182-1. Epub 2021 May 6.
Although false memories have largely been examined with the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, little research has focused on the semantic context in which associates are encoded. Across three experiments, we varied semantic context during a sentence-processing task with DRM associates embedded within sentences. More meaningful sentences resulted in greater memory errors (Experiment 1). Furthermore, providing contextual information to discriminate old from new items did not reduce false alarms relative to encoding words in isolation when sentences converged on the meaning of the critical lure (Experiment 2), and actually increased memory errors (Experiment 3). These results suggest that semantic context that allows for meaningful relational processing of items within-lists and that converge on the semantic meaning of the critical lure increases the likelihood that the list theme is identified, resulting in more errors at test.
虽然虚假记忆在很大程度上已经通过 Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式进行了研究,但很少有研究关注在关联被编码时的语义上下文。在三个实验中,我们在句子处理任务中改变了语义上下文,DRM 关联嵌入在句子中。更有意义的句子会导致更多的记忆错误(实验 1)。此外,当句子集中在关键诱饵的语义上时,提供上下文信息来区分旧项目和新项目并不能相对于单独编码单词来减少错误警报(实验 2),实际上增加了记忆错误(实验 3)。这些结果表明,允许在列表内的项目之间进行有意义的关系处理并且集中在关键诱饵的语义意义上的语义上下文增加了识别列表主题的可能性,从而在测试中导致更多错误。