Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy.
作者信息
Goense Lucas, Ruurda Jelle P, van Hillergersberg Richard
机构信息
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):E243-E246. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后并发症定义及基准评估的最新进展
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):E243-E246. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.12.
2
Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术相关并发症的基准测试。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):291-298. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611.
3
Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients.定义胸腔镜食管切除术的基准：低危患者完全微创食管切除术的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):814-821. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002445.
4
Comment on "Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low-risk Patients".关于《定义经胸食管癌切除术的基准：低风险患者全胸腔镜下食管癌切除术的多中心分析》的评论
Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):e26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003006.
5
Response to Comment on "Letter to editor: 'Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low-risk Patients"'.对《致编辑的信：“定义经胸食管切除术的基准：低风险患者全胸腔镜下食管切除术的多中心分析”》评论的回复
Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):e26-e27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003008.
6
Comment on: "Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, et al. Benchmarking Complications Associated With Esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2019;269: 291-298".评论：“洛·德、库普萨米·MK、奥尔德森·D等。食管癌切除术相关并发症的基准研究。《外科学年鉴》2019年；269卷：291 - 298页”
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):e123-e124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003382.
7
Evaluation of International Contemporary Operative Outcomes and Management Trends Associated With Esophagectomy: A 4-Year Study of >6000 Patients Using ECCG Definitions and the Online Esodata Database.评估国际当代手术结果和与食管切除术相关的管理趋势：使用 ECCG 定义和在线 Esodata 数据库对 >6000 例患者进行的 4 年研究。
Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):515-525. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004309.
8
Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery.基准测试：一种用于手术结果比较的新型衡量工具。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000212.
9
Benchmark analyses in minimally invasive esophagectomy-impact on surgical quality improvement.微创食管切除术的基准分析——对外科手术质量改善的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S771-S776. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.124.
10
Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.使用基准标准评估向微创食管切除术的过渡。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb;109(2):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
引用本文的文献
1
Does Thoracic Duct Ligation at the Time of Esophagectomy Impact Long-Term Survival? An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.食管癌切除术中进行胸导管结扎会影响长期生存吗？一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 12;13(10):2849. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102849.
本文引用的文献
1
Benchmark analyses in minimally invasive esophagectomy-impact on surgical quality improvement.微创食管切除术的基准分析——对外科手术质量改善的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S771-S776. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.124.
2
Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).根据食管并发症共识小组 (ECCG) 报告食管癌切除和胃切除术的国家结局。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003210.
3
Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking.通过基准测试提高手术效果。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):59-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10976. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Defining pneumonia after esophagectomy for cancer: validation of the Uniform Pneumonia Score in a high volume center in North America.食管癌切除术后肺炎的定义：北美一家大型中心对统一肺炎评分的验证
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jun 1;31(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy002.
5
Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术相关并发症的基准测试。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):291-298. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611.
6
Improving the quality of surgical care: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.提高外科护理质量：美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划
Rev Calid Asist. 2017 Nov-Dec;32(6):301-302. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
7
Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients.定义胸腔镜食管切除术的基准：低危患者完全微创食管切除术的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):814-821. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002445.
8
Oesophageal cancer.食管癌。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2383-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.荷兰上消化道肿瘤审计的早期结果。
Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1855-1863. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10303. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
10
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: achieving better and safer surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划：实现更优质、更安全的手术。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 May;41(5):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41026-8.
Zotero 插件