• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基准测试:一种用于手术结果比较的新型衡量工具。

Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery.

机构信息

Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000212.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000212
PMID:37093075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389472/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Benchmarking, a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons, is a recent concept in surgery. The objectives of this review are to examine the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking and its application in surgery.

METHODS

The literature about benchmarking was reviewed through an ever-narrowing search strategy, commencing from the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking to the application of benchmarking and experiences of benchmarking in surgery. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched until 20 September 2022, in the English language according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

In the first phase of the literature search, the development of benchmarking was identified. The definitions of benchmarking evolved from a surveying term to a novel quality-improvement tool to assess the best achievable results in surgery. In the second phase, a total of 23 studies were identified about benchmarking in surgery, including esophagectomy, hepatic surgery, pancreatic surgery, rectum resection, and bariatric surgery. All studies were multicenter analyses from national, international, or global expert centers. Most studies (87.0%) adopted the definition that benchmark was the 75th percentile of the median values of centers. Performance metrics to define benchmarks were clinically relevant intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators.

CONCLUSION

Benchmarking in surgery is a novel quality-improvement tool to define and measure the best achievable results, establishing a meaningful reference to evaluate surgical performance.

摘要

简介

基准测试是一种用于比较结果的新的衡量工具,是最近在外科领域出现的概念。本文旨在探讨基准测试的概念、定义和演变,及其在外科领域的应用。

方法

通过不断缩小搜索策略,对基准测试的文献进行了回顾,从基准测试的概念、定义和演变,到基准测试的应用以及在外科领域的应用经验进行了综述。根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,以英文检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Science Direct 数据库,检索时间截至 2022 年 9 月 20 日。

结果

在文献检索的第一阶段,确定了基准测试的发展过程。基准测试的定义从调查术语演变为一种新的质量改进工具,用于评估外科手术中可达到的最佳结果。在第二阶段,共确定了 23 项关于外科基准测试的研究,包括食管切除术、肝脏手术、胰腺手术、直肠切除术和减重手术。所有研究均为来自国家、国际或全球专家中心的多中心分析。大多数研究(87.0%)采用的基准定义是中心中位数的 75%分位数。定义基准的绩效指标是临床相关的围手术期和术后结局指标。

结论

外科领域的基准测试是一种用于定义和衡量最佳可实现结果的新的质量改进工具,为评估外科手术表现建立了有意义的参考标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a742/10389472/28ee8b69c47a/js9-109-419-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a742/10389472/28ee8b69c47a/js9-109-419-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a742/10389472/28ee8b69c47a/js9-109-419-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery.基准测试:一种用于手术结果比较的新型衡量工具。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000212.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
8
Surgery for epilepsy.癫痫手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD010541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.

引用本文的文献

1
Placenta segmentation redefined: review of deep learning integration of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging.胎盘分割的重新定义:磁共振成像与超声成像深度学习整合的综述
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2025 Jul 15;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s42492-025-00197-8.
2
Evaluation of the SwedeAmp database: Focus on coverage and amputation level rates.瑞典截肢数据库评估:聚焦覆盖范围和截肢水平发生率。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2024 Nov 19;7(2):44089. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44089. eCollection 2024.
3
Recommendations for the implementation and conduct of multidisciplinary team meetings for those providing endometriosis and adenomyosis care - a Delphi consensus of the European Endometriosis League (EEL).

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarks in colorectal surgery: multinational study to define quality thresholds in high and low anterior resection.结直肠外科的基准:多国研究定义高低位前切除术的质量阈值。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1274-1281. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac300.
2
Liver Transplantation as a New Standard of Care in Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? Results From an International Benchmark Study.肝移植作为肝门部胆管癌患者的新标准治疗方法?来自国际基准研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):846-853. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005641. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Novel Benchmark Values for Redo Liver Transplantation: Does the Outcome Justify the Effort?
为子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌病护理人员提供的多学科团队会议实施与开展建议——欧洲子宫内膜异位症联盟(EEL)的德尔菲共识
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):337-350. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.038.
再移植肝脏的新基准值:结果是否合理?
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):860-867. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005634. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes From 16 International Expert Centers.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术:一种新的护理标准?来自16个国际专家中心的手术结果基准值。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):253-259. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005601. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study.定义腹腔镜肝切除术的全球基准:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e839-e848. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005530. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study.微创远端胰腺脾脏切除术的基准测试:欧洲多中心研究。
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1124-1130. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac204.
7
Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Distal Pancreatectomy: Results of a French Multicentric Study.定义胰腺远端切除术的基准结果:一项法国多中心研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):103-109. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005539. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
8
Variations in risk-adjusted outcomes following 4318 laparoscopic liver resections.4318例腹腔镜肝切除术后风险调整结局的差异
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 May;29(5):521-530. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1141. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Benchmarking postoperative outcomes after open liver surgery for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a national cohort.在全国队列中对肝硬化合并肝细胞癌行开腹肝切除术患者的术后结局进行基准测试。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Aug;24(8):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review.标杆管理在医疗质量改进中的作用。系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8.