Cuenca-Martínez Ferran, Suso-Martí Luis, León-Hernández Jose Vicente, La Touche Roy
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Brain Sci. 2020 Jan 2;10(1):27. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10010027.
We present a neurophysiological hypothesis for the role of motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) training in the motor learning process. The effects of movement representation in the brain and those of the cortical-subcortical networks related to planning, executing, adjusting, and automating real movements share a similar neurophysiological activity. Coupled with the influence of certain variables related to the movement representation process, this neurophysiological activity is a key component of the present hypothesis. These variables can be classified into four domains: physical, cognitive-evaluative, motivational-emotional, and direct-modulation. The neurophysiological activity underlying the creation and consolidation of mnemonic representations of motor gestures as a prerequisite to motor learning might differ between AO and MI. Together with variations in cognitive loads, these differences might explain the differing results in motor learning. The mirror neuron system appears to function more efficiently through AO training than MI, and AO is less demanding in terms of cognitive load than MI. AO might be less susceptible to the influence of variables related to movement representation.
我们提出了一个关于运动想象(MI)和动作观察(AO)训练在运动学习过程中作用的神经生理学假设。大脑中运动表征的影响以及与计划、执行、调整和自动化实际运动相关的皮质-皮质下网络的影响,具有相似的神经生理活动。再加上与运动表征过程相关的某些变量的影响,这种神经生理活动是本假设的关键组成部分。这些变量可分为四个领域:身体、认知-评价、动机-情感和直接调节。作为运动学习前提的运动手势记忆表征的创建和巩固所基于的神经生理活动,在AO和MI之间可能存在差异。连同认知负荷的变化,这些差异可能解释运动学习中不同的结果。镜像神经元系统似乎通过AO训练比通过MI训练能更有效地发挥作用,并且AO在认知负荷方面比MI要求更低。AO可能不太容易受到与运动表征相关变量的影响。