Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Rotary Circle, Suite 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Transplant Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1155-1.
Recent evidence cautions against the use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) in patients with refractory ascites or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis while other data suggests a survival benefit in patients with advanced liver disease. The aim of this study was to describe the use and impact of NSBB in patients with cirrhosis referred for liver transplantation.
A single-center cohort of patients with cirrhosis, who were referred and evaluated for liver transplantation between January and June 2012 were studied for baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Patients were grouped according to the use of NSBB at initial evaluation, with the endpoint of 90-day mortality.
Sixty-five (38%) of 170 consecutive patients evaluated for liver transplantation were taking NSBB. Patients taking NSBB had higher MELD and Child Pugh score. NSBB use was associated with lower 90-day mortality (6% vs. 15%) with a risk adjusted hazard ratio of 0.27 (95%CI .09-0.88, p = .03). Patients taking NSBB developed acute kidney injury (AKI) within 90 days more frequently than patients not taking NSBB (22% vs 11%), p = 0.048). However, this was related to increased stage 1 AKI episodes, all of which resolved. Twelve (27%) of 45 patients with > 90 day follow up discontinued NSBB, most commonly for hypotension and AKI, had increased subsequent MELD and mortality.
NSBB use in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplant evaluation is associated with better short-term survival. Nevertheless, ongoing tolerance of NSBB in this population is dynamic and may select a subset of patients with better hemodynamic reserve.
最近的证据警告说,在难治性腹水或自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者中不应使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB),而其他数据则表明,在晚期肝病患者中使用 NSBB 可带来生存获益。本研究旨在描述肝硬化患者在接受肝移植评估时使用 NSBB 的情况及其对患者的影响。
研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 6 月期间在单中心接受肝移植评估的肝硬化患者,对患者的基线特征和临床结局进行了研究。根据初始评估时是否使用 NSBB 将患者分组,以 90 天死亡率为终点。
170 例连续接受肝移植评估的患者中,有 65 例(38%)正在服用 NSBB。服用 NSBB 的患者的 MELD 和 Child Pugh 评分更高。NSBB 的使用与 90 天死亡率降低相关(6% vs. 15%),风险调整后的危险比为 0.27(95%CI 0.09-0.88,p=0.03)。服用 NSBB 的患者在 90 天内发生急性肾损伤(AKI)的频率高于未服用 NSBB 的患者(22% vs. 11%,p=0.048)。然而,这与增加的 AKI 1 期发作有关,所有这些发作都得到了缓解。45 例有>90 天随访的患者中有 12 例(27%)停用了 NSBB,停用的主要原因为低血压和 AKI,且随后 MELD 和死亡率增加。
肝硬化患者在接受肝移植评估时使用 NSBB 与短期生存率的提高有关。然而,该人群对 NSBB 的持续耐受是动态的,可能选择了具有更好血流动力学储备的亚组患者。