Department of Infectious Disease, QiLu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4729-1.
Brucellosis is endemic in many areas in China. The current diagnosis of Brucellosis predominantly relies on the traditional bacterial culture and serum agglutination test. In this study, we aimed to explore the value of ELISA in the diagnosis of Brucellosis in Chinese population.
We recruited 235 patients with a diagnosis of Brucellosis at different clinical stages: 117 in acute, 78 in subacute, and 40 in chronic. We also recruited 248 control patients who presented with similar clinical symptoms but with a different diagnosis other than Brucellosis. In addition, 90 healthy volunteers were also recruited. Bacterial culture, agglutination test and ELISA assay were performed to detect Brucella spp.
Among 235 patients with Brucellosis, 51 (21.7%) was positive for bacterial culture, 150 (63.8%) were positive by agglutination test, and 232 (98.7%) were positive by ELISA (IgG and/or IgM). When we stratified the patients based on the disease stages (acute, subacute and chronic), ELISA was the most sensitive method and showed a highest positive rate in all stages. By Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve analysis of ELISA results, we found that measurement of IgG level was superior to measurement of IgM level (AUC, 0.993 versus 0.877). Since the measurement of IgG itself missed rare cases in acute phase, we recommended measuring IgG and IgM simultaneously by ELISA for the diagnosis of Brucellosis. In term of the specificity of ELISA in the diagnosis of Brucellosis, our study showed that only 1.6% (4/248) non-Brucellosis patients were positive by ELISA; all positive cases were IgM only and none showed positive IgG. Similar results were found in healthy volunteers. In summary, our study concluded that ELISA is the most sensitive and specific method to detect Brucellosis in Chinese population.
ELISA assay is sensitive, fast, and convenient to detect Brucellosis. It shows the high sensitivity and specifity and should be used as a routine lab test when Brucellosis is suspected in clinical practice.
布鲁氏菌病在中国许多地区流行。目前布鲁氏菌病的诊断主要依赖于传统的细菌培养和血清凝集试验。本研究旨在探讨 ELISA 在我国人群布鲁氏菌病诊断中的价值。
我们招募了 235 名不同临床阶段的布鲁氏菌病患者:急性 117 例,亚急性 78 例,慢性 40 例。同时,我们还招募了 248 名具有类似临床症状但诊断为布鲁氏菌病以外的其他疾病的对照患者。此外,我们还招募了 90 名健康志愿者。采用细菌培养、凝集试验和 ELISA 法检测布鲁氏菌属。
在 235 例布鲁氏菌病患者中,51 例(21.7%)细菌培养阳性,150 例(63.8%)凝集试验阳性,232 例(98.7%)ELISA(IgG 和/或 IgM)阳性。当我们根据疾病阶段(急性、亚急性和慢性)对患者进行分层时,ELISA 是最敏感的方法,在所有阶段的阳性率均最高。通过 ELISA 结果的受试者工作特征曲线分析,我们发现 IgG 水平的测量优于 IgM 水平的测量(AUC,0.993 比 0.877)。由于 IgG 本身在急性期罕见病例中漏诊,我们建议同时测量 IgG 和 IgM 以进行布鲁氏菌病的诊断。就 ELISA 诊断布鲁氏菌病的特异性而言,我们的研究表明,只有 1.6%(4/248)非布鲁氏菌病患者 ELISA 阳性;所有阳性病例均为 IgM 阳性,无一例 IgG 阳性。在健康志愿者中也得到了类似的结果。综上所述,我们的研究表明,ELISA 是检测中国人群布鲁氏菌病最敏感、最特异的方法。
ELISA 检测法快速、敏感、方便,用于临床怀疑布鲁氏菌病时,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,应作为常规实验室检测方法。