Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Avenue, Tulsa, OK, 74136, USA.
VA Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3802-9.
Only 40-60% of patients with generalized anxiety disorder experience long-lasting improvement with gold standard psychosocial interventions. Identifying neurobehavioral factors that predict treatment success might provide specific targets for more individualized interventions, fostering more optimal outcomes and bringing us closer to the goal of "personalized medicine." Research suggests that reward and threat processing (approach/avoidance behavior) and cognitive control may be important for understanding anxiety and comorbid depressive disorders and may have relevance to treatment outcomes. This study was designed to determine whether approach-avoidance behaviors and associated neural responses moderate treatment response to exposure-based versus behavioral activation therapy for generalized anxiety disorder.
METHODS/DESIGN: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial involving two 10-week group-based interventions: exposure-based therapy or behavioral activation therapy. These interventions focus on specific and unique aspects of threat and reward processing, respectively. Prior to and after treatment, participants are interviewed and undergo behavioral, biomarker, and neuroimaging assessments, with a focus on approach and avoidance processing and decision-making. Primary analyses will use mixed models to examine whether hypothesized approach, avoidance, and conflict arbitration behaviors and associated neural responses at baseline moderate symptom change with treatment, as assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 item scale. Exploratory analyses will examine additional potential treatment moderators and use data reduction and machine learning methods.
This protocol provides a framework for how studies may be designed to move the field toward neuroscience-informed and personalized psychosocial treatments. The results of this trial will have implications for approach-avoidance processing in generalized anxiety disorder, relationships between levels of analysis (i.e., behavioral, neural), and predictors of behavioral therapy outcome.
The study was retrospectively registered within 21 days of first participant enrollment in accordance with FDAAA 801 with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807480. Registered on June 21, 2016, before results.
仅有 40-60% 的广泛性焦虑障碍患者通过金标准的心理社会干预获得持久改善。识别出预测治疗效果的神经行为因素可能为更个体化的干预提供特定靶点,促进更优的结局,并使我们更接近“个体化医学”的目标。研究表明,奖赏和威胁处理(趋近/回避行为)以及认知控制对于理解焦虑和共病抑郁障碍可能很重要,并且与治疗结局相关。本研究旨在确定趋近-回避行为和相关神经反应是否调节广泛性焦虑障碍暴露治疗与行为激活治疗的反应。
方法/设计:我们正在开展一项随机对照试验,纳入两项为期 10 周的基于小组的干预措施:暴露治疗或行为激活治疗。这两种干预措施分别侧重于威胁和奖赏处理的特定和独特方面。在治疗前后,参与者接受访谈并进行行为、生物标志物和神经影像学评估,重点关注趋近和回避处理以及决策。主要分析将使用混合模型,以检查假设的在治疗前的趋近、回避和冲突仲裁行为以及相关的神经反应是否调节治疗后用广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表评估的症状变化。探索性分析将检查额外的潜在治疗调节因素,并使用数据缩减和机器学习方法。
该方案为研究设计提供了一个框架,使该领域朝着神经科学为基础和个体化的心理社会治疗迈进。该试验的结果将对广泛性焦虑障碍的趋近-回避处理、分析水平(即行为、神经)之间的关系以及行为治疗结果的预测因素产生影响。
根据 FDAAA 801 要求,在首次纳入参与者后 21 天内对该研究进行了回顾性注册,并在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上登记,编号为 NCT02807480。于 2016 年 6 月 21 日在结果之前登记。