• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于治疗指数的胆囊癌淋巴结清扫术的生存获益:美国肝外胆管恶性肿瘤联盟的分析。

Survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer based on the therapeutic index: An analysis of the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):503-510. doi: 10.1002/jso.25825. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1002/jso.25825
PMID:31907941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292425/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of lymphadenectomy among patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains poorly understood.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for GBC between 2000 and 2015 were identified from a US multi-institutional database. The therapeutic index (LNM rate multiplied by 3-year overall survival [OS]) was determined to assess the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Among 449 patients, less than half had LNM (N = 183, 40.8%). The median number of evaluated and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-6) and 1 (IQR: 0-1), respectively. 3-year OS among patients with LNM in the entire cohort was 26.8%. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with T4 (5.9) or T1 (6.0) tumors as well as carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) ≥200 UI/mL (6.0). Of note, a therapeutic index difference ≥10 was noted relative to CA19-9 (<200: 18.7 vs ≥200: 6.0), American Joint Committee on Cancer T Stage (T1: 6.0 vs T2: 17.8 vs T4: 5.9) and number of LNs examined (1-2: 6.9 vs ≥6: 16.9). Concomitant common bile duct resection was not associated with a higher therapeutic index among patients with either T2 or T3 disease.

CONCLUSION

Certain clinicopathological factors including T1 or T4 tumor and CA19-9 ≥200 UI/mL were associated with a low therapeutic index. Resection of six or more LNs was associated with a meaningful therapeutic index benefit among patients with LNM.

摘要

背景

胆囊癌(GBC)患者行淋巴结清扫术的生存获益仍不清楚。

方法

从美国多机构数据库中确定了 2000 年至 2015 年间接受 GBC 切除术的患者。通过确定治疗指数(LNM 率乘以 3 年总生存率 [OS])来评估淋巴结清扫术的生存获益。

结果

在 449 名患者中,不到一半的患者发生 LNM(N=183,40.8%)。评估和转移性淋巴结(LNs)的中位数数量分别为 3(四分位距 [IQR]:1-6)和 1(IQR:0-1)。整个队列中 LNM 患者的 3 年 OS 为 26.8%。T4(5.9)或 T1(6.0)肿瘤以及肿瘤标志物 CA19-9≥200 UI/mL(6.0)患者的治疗指数较低。值得注意的是,与 CA19-9(<200:18.7 vs ≥200:6.0)、美国癌症联合委员会 T 分期(T1:6.0 vs T2:17.8 vs T4:5.9)和检查的 LNs 数量(1-2:6.9 vs ≥6:16.9)相比,治疗指数差异≥10。对于 T2 或 T3 疾病患者,同时行胆总管切除术与较高的治疗指数无关。

结论

某些临床病理因素,包括 T1 或 T4 肿瘤和 CA19-9≥200 UI/mL,与低治疗指数相关。在有 LNM 的患者中,切除 6 个或更多的 LNs 与显著的治疗指数获益相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4283/9292425/2ec046b29d82/JSO-121-503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4283/9292425/e25e7886d58d/JSO-121-503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4283/9292425/2ec046b29d82/JSO-121-503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4283/9292425/e25e7886d58d/JSO-121-503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4283/9292425/2ec046b29d82/JSO-121-503-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer based on the therapeutic index: An analysis of the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.基于治疗指数的胆囊癌淋巴结清扫术的生存获益:美国肝外胆管恶性肿瘤联盟的分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):503-510. doi: 10.1002/jso.25825. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
The optimal number of lymph nodes to evaluate among patients undergoing surgery for gallbladder cancer: Correlating the number of nodes removed with survival in 6531 patients.胆囊癌手术患者中评估淋巴结的最佳数量:6531例患者切除淋巴结数量与生存率的相关性
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(8):1099-1107. doi: 10.1002/jso.25450. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?肝内胆管癌患者淋巴结清扫术的治疗指数:哪些患者最受益于淋巴结评估?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2959-2968. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Open versus laparoscopic portal lymphadenectomy in gallbladder cancer: is there a difference in lymph node yield?胆囊癌中开放性与腹腔镜门静脉淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结收获量有差异吗?
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Jun;20(6):505-513. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.015. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Lymphatic spread of T2 gallbladder carcinoma: Regional lymphadenectomy is required independent of tumor location.T2 期胆囊癌的淋巴转移:区域性淋巴结清扫术是必需的,与肿瘤位置无关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1446-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
6
Therapeutic index of lymphadenectomy among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multi-institutional analysis.神经内分泌肿瘤患者淋巴结清扫术的治疗指数:多机构分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(7):1080-1086. doi: 10.1002/jso.25689. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis.美国胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者评估淋巴结数量的趋势:多机构和国家数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08120-1. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
8
Incidental gallbladder cancer by the AFC-GBC-2009 Study Group.AFC-GBC-2009 研究组偶然发现的胆囊癌。
World J Surg. 2011 Aug;35(8):1887-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1134-3.
9
Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for a gallbladder cancer. Extension of the lymph node dissection and prognostic value of the lymph node ratio.接受胆囊癌手术患者的淋巴结转移。淋巴结清扫范围及淋巴结比率的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):811-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4044-4. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Assessing the impact of common bile duct resection in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer.评估胆总管切除术在胆囊癌外科治疗中的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;114(2):176-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.24283. Epub 2016 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Trends in Surgical Strategies of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer: A Narrative Review.早期胆囊癌手术策略的最新趋势:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 4;14(15):5483. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155483.
2
Identification of publication characteristics and research trends in the management of gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌管理领域的出版物特征及研究趋势识别
ILIVER. 2022 Jul 14;1(2):127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.06.004. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcomes in Gallbladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular pathways and potential biomarkers in gallbladder cancer: A comprehensive review.胆囊癌中的分子通路和潜在生物标志物:全面综述。
Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;31:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
Therapeutic index of lymphadenectomy among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multi-institutional analysis.神经内分泌肿瘤患者淋巴结清扫术的治疗指数:多机构分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(7):1080-1086. doi: 10.1002/jso.25689. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
ASO Author Reflections: Which Patients Benefit the Most From Lymphadenectomy During Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma?
接受根治性手术的胆囊癌患者的预后因素及治疗结果:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 3;32(6):328. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060328.
4
Clinical diagnosis and treatment of 37 cases of gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma.37 例胆囊神经内分泌癌的临床诊治。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun 14;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03436-z.
5
Gallbladder cancer: current and future treatment options.胆囊癌:当前及未来的治疗选择
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 11;14:1183619. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1183619. eCollection 2023.
6
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Survival Analysis.肝外胆管癌的新辅助治疗:一项倾向评分匹配生存分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 2;12(7):2654. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072654.
7
Clockwise Anterior-to-Posterior-Double Isolation (CAP-DI) Approach for Portal Lymphadenectomy in Biliary Tract Cancer: Technique, Yield, and Outcomes.顺时针方向从前向后双重隔离(CAP-DI)法在胆管癌门静脉淋巴结清扫术中的应用:技术、切除率及结果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;14(23):5770. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235770.
8
Prediction of Early Recurrence After R0 Resection for Gallbladder Carcinoma of Stage T1b-T3.T1b-T3期胆囊癌R0切除术后早期复发的预测
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Jan 3;14:37-47. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S342674. eCollection 2022.
9
Essential updates 2019/2020: Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer.2019/2020年重要更新:胆囊癌的外科治疗
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Jan 29;5(2):152-161. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12434. eCollection 2021 Mar.
ASO作者反思:肝内胆管癌切除术中哪些患者从淋巴结清扫中获益最大?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2969-2970. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07608-0. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?肝内胆管癌患者淋巴结清扫术的治疗指数:哪些患者最受益于淋巴结评估?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2959-2968. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Staging gallbladder cancer with lymphadenectomy: the practical application of new AHPBA and AJCC guidelines.以淋巴切除术对胆囊癌进行分期:新的 AHPBA 和 AJCC 指南的实际应用。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1563-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.372. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
The optimal number of lymph nodes to evaluate among patients undergoing surgery for gallbladder cancer: Correlating the number of nodes removed with survival in 6531 patients.胆囊癌手术患者中评估淋巴结的最佳数量:6531例患者切除淋巴结数量与生存率的相关性
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(8):1099-1107. doi: 10.1002/jso.25450. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on outcomes in patients with lymph node-negative gallbladder carcinoma.淋巴结检出数对淋巴结阴性胆囊癌患者预后的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2886-2892. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2886.
8
Role of common bile duct resection in T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer patients.胆总管切除术在T2和T3期胆囊癌患者中的作用。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Feb;22(1):42-51. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.1.42. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017.美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南解读:肝胆癌,2017年第1版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 May;15(5):563-573. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0059.
10
The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.第八版 AJCC 癌症分期手册:继续从基于人群的方法向更“个体化”的癌症分期方法构建桥梁。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.