• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高癌症患者健康素养的有效干预措施。

Effective interventions to improve the health literacy of cancer patients.

作者信息

Fernández-González Loreto, Bravo-Valenzuela Paulina

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.

Nursing School, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Oct 10;13:966. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.966. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2019.966
PMID:31921337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6834381/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Health literacy (HL) refers to the cognitive and social abilities that are determinants in the motivation and capacity of the individual to access, understand and use information for the care of one's own health. In oncology, increased survival, navigation of the healthcare system, the many different forms of treatment and the management of adverse effects/outcomes make HL a critical factor in patient care. The objective of this study is to identify the structure, content and effectiveness of interventions to improve HL in cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed using the '(health literacy OR Cancer Literacy) AND Cancer AND Intervention' strategy on seven multidisciplinary databases. Studies that intervened in subjects diagnosed with cancer and treating HL explicitly as a variable to be measured were included.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred and thirty-six abstracts were retrieved. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Research focused on patients diagnosed with breast cancer or prostate cancer. Interventions used multimedia resources and face-to-face interactions. No study defined HL. HL was usually a secondary outcome. There is high variability in the design of studies and interventions and in the instruments used to measure HL. The effectiveness of the interventions varied between studies, with improvements that were diminished over time or insufficient in participants with initial low literacy.

CONCLUSION

The evidence to date in interventions oriented to study HL in patients with cancer is focused on other constructs, leaving HL as a phenomenon difficult to define both conceptually and clinically. Variability in designs and measurements makes comparison between interventions difficult. Defining and operationalizing HL is critical to design and measure effective interventions, which must be adapted to patients' needs.

摘要

未标注

健康素养(HL)是指个人获取、理解和使用信息以维护自身健康的动机和能力的认知及社会能力的决定因素。在肿瘤学领域,提高生存率、在医疗体系中顺利就医、应对多种不同治疗方式以及管理不良反应/结果使得健康素养成为患者护理中的关键因素。本研究的目的是确定改善癌症患者健康素养的干预措施的结构、内容和效果。

材料与方法

采用“(健康素养或癌症素养)与癌症与干预”策略在七个多学科数据库中进行文献综述。纳入对被诊断患有癌症的受试者进行干预并将健康素养明确作为一个待测量变量的研究。

结果

检索到1236篇摘要。八项研究符合纳入标准。研究主要聚焦于被诊断患有乳腺癌或前列腺癌的患者。干预措施使用了多媒体资源和面对面互动。没有研究对健康素养进行定义。健康素养通常是次要结果。研究和干预措施的设计以及用于测量健康素养的工具存在很大差异。不同研究中干预措施的效果各不相同,随着时间推移改善效果减弱,或者初始健康素养较低的参与者改善不足。

结论

迄今为止,针对癌症患者健康素养研究的干预措施的证据主要集中在其他结构方面,使得健康素养在概念和临床层面都难以定义。设计和测量方面的差异使得不同干预措施之间难以比较。定义和实施健康素养对于设计和测量有效的干预措施至关重要,这些干预措施必须适应患者的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/6834381/06946e8881fc/can-13-966fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/6834381/06946e8881fc/can-13-966fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/6834381/06946e8881fc/can-13-966fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective interventions to improve the health literacy of cancer patients.提高癌症患者健康素养的有效干预措施。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Oct 10;13:966. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.966. eCollection 2019.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Effects of health literacy interventions on health-related outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults living in the community: a systematic review.健康素养干预措施对社区中社会经济地位不利的成年人健康相关结局的影响:一项系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jul;18(7):1389-1469. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00023.
5
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Interventions for improving the research literacy of nurses: a systematic review.提高护士研究素养的干预措施:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):256-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2378.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review.改善低健康素养育龄期妇女健康的干预措施:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207405.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer health literacy in Kenya - A scoping review on evidence, concept and a situational analysis of interventions.肯尼亚的癌症健康素养——关于证据、概念及干预措施的现状分析的范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 May 16;13:1527400. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527400. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions Addressing Health Literacy in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Reviews.癌症护理中针对健康素养的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 2;22(2):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020212.
3
Spanish version of the short European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire HLS-Q12: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric properties.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens.癌症健康素养与参与癌症研究和捐赠生物样本的意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 24;15(10):2091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102091.
2
Health Literacy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: An Understudied Issue.头颈癌患者的健康素养:一个研究不足的问题。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul 1;143(7):645-646. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0242.
3
Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress.提高社区人群的健康素养:进展综述
短欧洲健康素养调查问卷 HLS-Q12 的西班牙语版:跨文化适应和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299736. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of telenurse-led intervention in clinical trials on health literacy, empowerment, and health outcomes in patients with solid tumours: a pilot quasi-experimental study.远程护士主导的干预措施在实体瘤患者临床试验中对健康素养、自我效能感及健康结局的影响:一项试点类实验研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 2;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01641-x.
5
Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations.约旦结直肠癌幸存者和非正式照护者的癌症知识水平:定性探讨。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 20;11:1116882. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116882. eCollection 2023.
6
The role of health literacy in cancer care: A mixed studies systematic review.健康素养在癌症护理中的作用:混合研究系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0259815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259815. eCollection 2021.
7
Is the health literacy of informal caregivers associated with the psychological outcomes of breast cancer survivors?非正式照护者的健康素养是否与乳腺癌幸存者的心理结果有关?
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Oct;15(5):729-737. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00964-x. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.健康素养干预在癌症中的应用:系统综述。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):240-252. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):901-911. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax015.
4
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
5
Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy.方法学综述:健康素养方面随机对照试验的质量
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 11;16:246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1479-2.
6
Accuracy of PSA Self-Reports among Low-Income Men with Prostate Cancer after a Public Health Nursing Intervention.公共卫生护理干预后低收入前列腺癌男性PSA自我报告的准确性
Public Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;33(6):511-518. doi: 10.1111/phn.12270. Epub 2016 May 8.
7
The association of health literacy with adherence in older adults, and its role in interventions: a systematic meta-review.老年人健康素养与依从性的关联及其在干预措施中的作用:一项系统的元综述。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 17;15:903. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2251-y.
8
Distribution of health literacy strengths and weaknesses across socio-demographic groups: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).不同社会人口群体健康素养优势与劣势的分布:一项使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 21;15:678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2056-z.
9
Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study.患者赋权的概念化:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 1;15:252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z.
10
Improving breast cancer survivors' knowledge using a patient-centered intervention.采用以患者为中心的干预措施提高乳腺癌幸存者的知识水平。
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.056. Epub 2015 May 29.