• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养干预在癌症中的应用:系统综述。

Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):240-252. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x
PMID:33155097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005416/
Abstract

Approximately one-third of adults in the United States (U.S.) have limited health literacy. Those with limited health literacy often have difficultly navigating the health care environment, including navigating care across the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment). Evidence-based interventions to assist adults with limited health literacy improve health outcomes; however, little is known about health literacy interventions in the context of cancer and their impact on cancer-specific health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the literature on health literacy interventions across the cancer care continuum. Specifically, our aim was to review the strength of evidence, outcomes assessed, and intervention modalities within the existing literature reporting health literacy interventions in cancer. Our search yielded 1036 records (prevention/screening n = 174; diagnosis/treatment n = 862). Following deduplication and review for inclusion criteria, we analyzed 87 records of intervention studies reporting health literacy outcomes, including 45 pilot studies (prevention/screening n = 24; diagnosis/treatment n = 21) and 42 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental trials (prevention/screening n = 31; diagnosis/treatment n = 11). This literature included 36 unique interventions (prevention/screening n = 28; diagnosis/treatment n = 8), mostly in the formative stages of intervention development, with few assessments of evidence-based interventions. These gaps in the literature necessitate further research in the development and implementation of evidence-based health literacy interventions to improve cancer outcomes.

摘要

大约三分之一的美国成年人(U.S.)存在健康素养有限的问题。这些人在医疗保健环境中常常难以应对,包括在癌症全过程中(例如,预防、筛查、诊断、治疗)寻求医疗服务。有证据支持的干预措施可以帮助健康素养有限的成年人改善健康结果;然而,关于癌症背景下的健康素养干预措施及其对癌症特定健康结果的影响的了解甚少。本研究的目的是确定并描述癌症护理全过程中健康素养干预措施的文献。具体而言,我们的目的是审查现有文献中关于癌症健康素养干预措施的报告,评估证据强度、评估结果和干预方式。我们的搜索结果产生了 1036 条记录(预防/筛查 n = 174;诊断/治疗 n = 862)。在进行去重和纳入标准审查后,我们分析了 87 篇报告健康素养结果的干预研究记录,其中包括 45 项试点研究(预防/筛查 n = 24;诊断/治疗 n = 21)和 42 项随机对照试验或准实验研究(预防/筛查 n = 31;诊断/治疗 n = 11)。该文献包括 36 项独特的干预措施(预防/筛查 n = 28;诊断/治疗 n = 8),主要处于干预措施开发的形成阶段,很少评估基于证据的干预措施。这些文献中的空白需要进一步研究开发和实施基于证据的健康素养干预措施,以改善癌症结果。

相似文献

1
Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.健康素养干预在癌症中的应用:系统综述。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):240-252. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.应对机构内儿童虐待的干预措施:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;17(1):e1139. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1139. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Effects of health literacy interventions on health-related outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults living in the community: a systematic review.健康素养干预措施对社区中社会经济地位不利的成年人健康相关结局的影响:一项系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jul;18(7):1389-1469. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00023.
6
7
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.
10
A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review.对小学课堂中移动设备使用情况及其对学生读写和算术能力影响的系统评价:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;20(2):e1417. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1417. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between the Health Literacy Levels of Women of Reproductive Age and Their Level of Knowledge About Cancer Screenings.育龄妇女的健康素养水平与其癌症筛查知识水平之间的关系。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70162. doi: 10.1111/jep.70162.
2
Resilience and frailty among gynecological patients in oncological treatment: the chain mediating role of stigma and health literacy.肿瘤治疗中妇科患者的复原力与脆弱性:耻辱感和健康素养的链式中介作用
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2;16:1497074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1497074. eCollection 2025.
3
Interventions Addressing Health Literacy in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Reviews.癌症护理中针对健康素养的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 2;22(2):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020212.
4
Acceptability and implementation potential of colorectal cancer screening and health literacy training: A qualitative study among general practitioners in deprived areas.结直肠癌筛查与健康素养培训的可接受性及实施潜力:贫困地区全科医生的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0317910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317910. eCollection 2025.
5
Prostate cancer screening in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study on current practices.中东和北非地区的前列腺癌筛查:当前实践的横断面研究
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Mar 3;9(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf019.
6
Bridging the digital divide for outpatients treated with anticancer chemotherapy: a retrospective quantitative and qualitative analysis of an adapted electronic Patient Reported Outcome program.弥合接受抗癌化疗门诊患者的数字鸿沟:一项对适配的电子患者报告结局项目的回顾性定量和定性分析
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 30;33(2):130. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09171-9.
7
The Readability Study: A Randomised Trial of Health Information Written at Different Grade Reading Levels.可读性研究:针对不同年级阅读水平编写的健康信息进行的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun;40(8):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09200-z. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
8
Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda.制定一项全市范围的、社区参与的癌症差异研究议程。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jan;36(1):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01919-8. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
9
Health literacy & Chagas disease knowledge: A cross-sectional study in Southern Loja Province, Ecuador.健康素养与恰加斯病知识:厄瓜多尔洛哈省南部的一项横断面研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 May 6;4:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100287. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Personal and organisational health literacy in the non-specific symptom pathway for cancer: An ethnographic study.非特异性症状途径中的个人和组织健康素养:一项民族志研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14062. doi: 10.1111/hex.14062.

本文引用的文献

1
Effective interventions to improve the health literacy of cancer patients.提高癌症患者健康素养的有效干预措施。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Oct 10;13:966. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.966. eCollection 2019.
2
Effects of the Values and Options in Cancer Care Communication Intervention on Personal Caregiver Experiences of Cancer Care and Bereavement Outcomes.癌症关怀沟通干预中价值观和选择的影响对癌症护理和丧亲结果的个人护理者体验。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1394-1400. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0078. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
3
Prospective, Randomized Control Trial Investigating the Impact of a Physician-Communicated Radiation Therapy Plan Review on Breast Cancer Patient-Reported Satisfaction.前瞻性、随机对照试验研究了医生沟通的放射治疗计划审查对乳腺癌患者报告满意度的影响。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):e487-e496. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Does silence speak louder than words? The impact of oncologists' emotion-oriented communication on analogue patients' information recall and emotional stress.沉默是否胜于雄辩?肿瘤医生情绪导向沟通对模拟患者信息回忆和情绪压力的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Culturally and linguistically diverse oncology patients' perspectives of consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists.文化和语言多样化的肿瘤患者对咨询录音和问题提示清单的看法。
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2180-2188. doi: 10.1002/pon.4789. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
7
Efficacy of a telephone outcall program to reduce caregiver burden among caregivers of cancer patients [PROTECT]: a randomised controlled trial.电话随访计划对减轻癌症患者照顾者负担的效果[PROTECT]:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3961-6.
8
Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.采用简化补充信息传单降低 NHS 肠癌筛查计划的社会经济梯度参与率:一项聚类随机试验。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1.
9
Charting the Future of Cancer Health Disparities Research: A Position Statement from the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute.绘制癌症健康差异研究的未来:美国癌症研究协会、美国癌症协会、美国临床肿瘤学会和美国国立癌症研究所的立场声明。
Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;77(17):4548-4555. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0623. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
10
Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.联合患者决策辅助工具与患者导航服务对比常规护理对弱势患者群体进行结直肠癌筛查的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):967-974. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294.