Ingelse Sarah A, Geukers Vincent G, Dijsselhof Monique E, Lemson Joris, Bem Reinout A, van Woensel Job B
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Dietetics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 10;7:496. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00496. eCollection 2019.
Fluid overload is common in critically ill children and is associated with adverse outcome. Therefore, restricting fluid intake may be beneficial. This study aims to study the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a conservative to a standard, more liberal, strategy of fluid management in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients with acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI). This is a feasibility study in a single, tertiary referral pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Twenty-three children receiving mechanical ventilation for ARTI, without ongoing hemodynamic support, admitted to the PICU of the Emma Children's Hospital/Amsterdam UMC between 2016 and 2018 were included. Patients were randomized to a conservative (<70% of normal intake) or standard (>85% of normal intake) fluid strategy, which was kept throughout the period of mechanical ventilation. Primary endpoints were adherence to fluid strategy and safety parameters such as calorie and protein intake. Secondary outcomes were cumulative fluid intake (CFI) and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) on day 3. In the conservative group, in 75% of the mechanical ventilation days patients achieved their target fluid intake. Median [25th-75th percentiles] calorie intake over all mechanical ventilation days was 67.9 [51.5-74.0] kcal/kg/day in the conservative vs. 67.2 [58.0-75.2] kcal/kg/day in the standard group ( = 0.878). Protein intake was 1.6 [1.3-1.8] gr protein/kg in the conservative and 1.5 [1.2-1.7] gr protein/kg in the standard group ( = 0.598). No adverse effects on hemodynamics or electrolyte imbalances were noted. Mean (±SD) CFI on day 3 was 262.3 (±58.9) ml/kg in the conservative group vs. 360.5 (±52.6) ml/kg in the standard fluid group ( < 0.001), which did not result in a lower CFB. A conservative fluid strategy in mechanically ventilated children with ARTI seems feasible, without limiting metabolic needs. However, in our study a conservative fluid strategy surprisingly did not reduce the degree of fluid overload. This study aids the design and sample size calculation of a future larger multicenter RCT, in which we need to redefine the target fluid strategy, possibly by even further fluid restriction and early initiation of active diuresis. : ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02989051.
液体超负荷在危重症儿童中很常见,且与不良预后相关。因此,限制液体摄入量可能有益。本研究旨在探讨一项随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验比较了机械通气的急性呼吸道感染(ARTI)儿科患者中保守的与标准的、更宽松的液体管理策略。这是一项在单一的三级转诊儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行的可行性研究。纳入了2016年至2018年期间入住艾玛儿童医院/阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心PICU、因ARTI接受机械通气且无持续血流动力学支持的23名儿童。患者被随机分为保守组(正常摄入量的<70%)或标准组(正常摄入量的>85%)的液体策略,在机械通气期间全程维持该策略。主要终点是对液体策略的依从性和安全参数,如热量和蛋白质摄入量。次要结局是第3天的累积液体摄入量(CFI)和累积液体平衡(CFB)。在保守组中,75%的机械通气日患者达到了目标液体摄入量。在所有机械通气日中,保守组的中位[第25 - 75百分位数]热量摄入量为67.9[51.5 - 74.0]kcal/kg/天,标准组为67.2[58.0 - 75.2]kcal/kg/天(P = 0.878)。保守组的蛋白质摄入量为1.6[1.3 - 1.8]g蛋白质/kg,标准组为1.5[1.2 - 1.7]g蛋白质/kg(P =