Suppr超能文献

腘绳肌近端修复的生物力学评估:全缝线锚钉与钛缝线锚钉的比较。

Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor.

作者信息

Otto Alexander, DiCosmo Alyssa M, Baldino Joshua B, Mehl Julian, Obopilwe Elifho, Cote Mark P, Imhoff Andreas B, Beitzel Knut, Mazzocca Augustus D, Coyner Katherine

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 2;8(1):2325967119892925. doi: 10.1177/2325967119892925. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proximal hamstring avulsions are severe tendon injuries and are commonly sports-related. Open and endoscopic techniques as well as different anchor configurations have already been described for proximal hamstring repair. Novel all-suture anchors have been developed to provide decreased bone loss during placement and reduced occupied bone volume when compared with titanium suture anchors.

HYPOTHESIS

Complete proximal hamstring avulsions repaired with all-suture anchors will demonstrate equal load to failure and comparable displacement under cyclic loading when compared with titanium suture anchors.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Complete proximal hamstring avulsions were created in 18 paired cadaveric specimens (mean ± SD age, 63.0 ± 10.4 years). Either all-suture anchors or titanium suture anchors were used for repair. Cyclic loading from 10 to 125 N at 1 Hz was performed for 1500 cycles with a material testing machine. Displacement was assessed along anterior and posterior aspects of the tendon repair with optical tracking. Specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min. Displacement, load to failure, and repair construct stiffness were compared between matched pairs with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were determined by Spearman rho analysis.

RESULTS

The all-suture anchors showed significantly higher load-to-failure values when compared with the titanium anchor repairs (799.64 ± 257.1 vs 573.27 ± 89.9 N; = .008). There was no significant difference in displacement between all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors at the anterior aspect (6.60 ± 2.2 vs 5.49 ± 1.1 mm; = .26) or posterior aspect (5.87 ± 2.08 vs 5.23 ± 1.37 mm; = .678) of the repaired hamstring tendons.

CONCLUSION

All-suture anchors demonstrated similar displacement and superior load to failure when compared with titanium suture anchors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study suggest that all-suture anchors are an equivalent alternative to titanium suture anchors for proximal hamstring avulsion repair.

摘要

背景

腘绳肌近端撕脱是严重的肌腱损伤,通常与运动相关。对于腘绳肌近端修复,已经描述了开放和内镜技术以及不同的锚钉配置。与钛合金缝线锚钉相比,新型全缝线锚钉已被开发出来,可在置入过程中减少骨质流失并减少骨体积占用。

假设

与钛合金缝线锚钉相比,使用全缝线锚钉修复完全性腘绳肌近端撕脱在循环加载下将表现出相等的破坏载荷和可比的位移。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

在18对尸体标本(平均±标准差年龄,63.0±10.4岁)上制造完全性腘绳肌近端撕脱。使用全缝线锚钉或钛合金缝线锚钉进行修复。用材料试验机以1Hz的频率从10N到125N进行1500次循环加载。通过光学跟踪评估肌腱修复前后方的位移。标本以120mm/min的速率加载至破坏。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较配对标本之间的位移、破坏载荷和修复结构刚度。通过Spearman秩相关分析确定相关性。

结果

与钛合金锚钉修复相比,全缝线锚钉显示出显著更高的破坏载荷值(799.64±257.1对573.27±89.9N;P = .008)。在修复的腘绳肌腱前方(6.60±2.2对5.49±1.1mm;P = .26)或后方(5.87±2.08对5.23±1.37mm;P = .678),全缝线锚钉和钛合金缝线锚钉之间的位移没有显著差异。

结论

与钛合金缝线锚钉相比,全缝线锚钉显示出相似的位移和更高的破坏载荷。

临床意义

本研究结果表明,在腘绳肌近端撕脱修复中,全缝线锚钉是钛合金缝线锚钉的等效替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95dc/6940602/c8ead62782c2/10.1177_2325967119892925-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验