Otto Alexander, Baldino Joshua B, DiCosmo Alyssa M, Coyner Katherine, Johnson Jeremiah D, Obopilwe Elifho, Cote Mark P, Muench Lukas N, Beitzel Knut, Scheiderer Bastian, Imhoff Andreas B, Mazzocca Augustus D, Mehl Julian
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 21;8(1):2325967119892281. doi: 10.1177/2325967119892281. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Lesser trochanter avulsions are rare injuries in adolescents. Severe cases with relevant fragment displacement can be treated surgically. However, no standard approach is available in the literature. Operative techniques are presently limited to anterograde fixations. A new retrograde approach to reduce operative difficulty and postoperative morbidity has been proposed. So far, no biomechanical comparison of these techniques is available.
Retrograde repair of the lesser trochanter with a titanium cortical button will produce superior stability under load to failure and similar displacement under cyclic loading compared with anterograde fixation with titanium suture anchors.
Controlled laboratory study.
Sixteen paired hemipelvic cadaveric specimens (mean age, 62.5 ± 10.7 years) were dissected to isolate the lesser trochanter and iliopsoas muscle. After repair of a simulated lesser trochanter avulsion, specimens were tested under cyclic loading between 10 and 125 N at 1 Hz for 1500 cycles before finally being loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min in a material testing machine. Motion tracking was used to assess displacement at the superior and inferior aspects of the iliopsoas tendon under cyclic loading.
Load to failure was significantly greater for the retrograde repair compared with the anterograde repair (1075.24 ± 179.39 vs 321.85 ± 62.45 N; = .012). Mean displacement at the superior repair aspect (retrograde vs anterograde: 3.29 ± 1.84 vs 4.39 ± 4.50 mm; = .779) and mean displacement at the inferior aspect (3.54 ± 2.13 vs 4.22 ± 4.48 mm; = .779) of the iliopsoas tendon did not significantly differ by the type of repair. Mode of failure was tendon tearing by the sutures for each retrograde repair and anchor pullout for each anterograde repair.
Surgical repair of lesser trochanter avulsion fractures with retrograde fixation using a titanium cortical button demonstrated superior load to failure and similar displacement under cyclic loading compared with anterograde fixation using suture anchors.
The retrograde approach provides a biomechanically validated alternative to other surgical techniques for this injury.
青少年小转子撕脱伤较为罕见。伴有相关骨折块移位的严重病例可采用手术治疗。然而,文献中尚无标准的手术方法。目前手术技术仅限于顺行固定。有人提出一种新的逆行方法以降低手术难度和术后发病率。到目前为止,尚无这些技术的生物力学比较。
与使用钛缝线锚钉进行顺行固定相比,使用钛皮质纽扣对小转子进行逆行修复在负载至失效时将产生更高的稳定性,并且在循环加载下具有相似的位移。
对照实验室研究。
解剖16对半骨盆尸体标本(平均年龄62.5±10.7岁),以分离小转子和髂腰肌。在模拟小转子撕脱伤修复后,标本在材料试验机中以1Hz的频率在10至125N之间进行循环加载测试1500次循环,最后以120mm/min的速率加载至失效。使用运动跟踪来评估循环加载下髂腰肌肌腱上下两端的位移。
与顺行修复相比,逆行修复的负载至失效显著更大(1075.24±179.39对321.85±62.45N;P = 0.012)。髂腰肌肌腱修复上端的平均位移(逆行对顺行:3.29±1.84对4.39±4.50mm;P = 0.779)和下端的平均位移(3.54±2.13对4.22±4.48mm;P = 0.779)在修复类型之间无显著差异。失效模式是每次逆行修复时缝线导致的肌腱撕裂和每次顺行修复时锚钉拔出。
与使用缝线锚钉进行顺行固定相比,使用钛皮质纽扣进行逆行固定手术修复小转子撕脱骨折在负载至失效时表现出更高的稳定性,并且在循环加载下具有相似的位移。
逆行方法为该损伤的其他手术技术提供了一种经生物力学验证的替代方法。