Suppr超能文献

增强慢性病患者能力以改善糖尿病困扰和血糖控制:一项混合实施-效果临床试验方案

Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trial.

作者信息

Woodard LeChauncy, Kamdar Nipa, Hundt Natalie, Gordon Howard S, Hertz Brian, Amspoker Amber B, Kiefer Lea, Mehta Praveen, Odom Edward, Rajan Suja, Stone Elizabeth, Jones Lindsey, Naik Aanand D

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety Michael E. DeBakey VAMC Houston Texas.

Department of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Nov 18;3(1):e00099. doi: 10.1002/edm2.99. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal-setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the EPIC intervention with enhanced usual care (EUC) at five clinic sites located in the greater Chicago and Houston areas. We will measure differences in haemoglobin A (HbA) and diabetes distress scale scores among study arms at post-intervention and maintenance (6 months post-intervention). We will evaluate implementation of the intervention across sites using the RE-AIM framework. We will evaluate by comparing the per cent and characteristics of enrolled study participants among all potentially eligible participants in the given clinic population. is reflected by the characteristics of the involved providers and the number of intervention sessions conducted. of EPIC will be evaluated by number of sessions delivered, participants' evaluation of group sessions, and evaluation of quality of goal-setting.

PATIENTS

We randomized 280 participants with equal allocation to EPIC and enhanced usual care (EUC).

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups were similar with the exception that EUC participants were more likely to have prior diabetes education. At baseline, participants were predominately older men who have poorly controlled diabetes (mean HbA = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%]) and moderate levels of diabetes distress (mean DDS = 2.43).

CONCLUSIONS

This hybrid effectiveness-implementation protocol is designed to accelerate the translation of a patient-centred diabetes care intervention from research to clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估一种协作式目标设定干预措施(慢性病护理中的患者赋权[EPIC])在改善血糖控制和糖尿病相关困扰方面的有效性,并将其应用于多个初级保健诊所的常规护理中。

设计

随机对照试验,比较EPIC干预措施与强化常规护理(EUC)在位于芝加哥大区和休斯顿地区的五个诊所的有效性。我们将测量干预后和维持期(干预后6个月)各研究组之间血红蛋白A(HbA)和糖尿病困扰量表评分的差异。我们将使用RE-AIM框架评估该干预措施在各诊所的实施情况。我们将通过比较给定诊所人群中所有潜在合格参与者中登记的研究参与者的百分比和特征来进行评估。这体现在参与提供者的特征和开展的干预课程数量上。EPIC的实施情况将通过授课节数、参与者对小组课程的评价以及目标设定质量的评价来评估。

患者

我们将280名参与者随机分为两组,EPIC组和强化常规护理(EUC)组人数相等。

结果

在基线时,两组相似,只是EUC组参与者更有可能接受过糖尿病前期教育。在基线时,参与者主要是患有糖尿病且控制不佳(平均HbA = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%])和中度糖尿病困扰(平均DDS = 2.43)的老年男性。

结论

这种混合有效性-实施方案旨在加速以患者为中心的糖尿病护理干预措施从研究到临床实践的转化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/4bc173b12716/EDM2-3-e00099-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验