• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强慢性病患者能力以改善糖尿病困扰和血糖控制:一项混合实施-效果临床试验方案

Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trial.

作者信息

Woodard LeChauncy, Kamdar Nipa, Hundt Natalie, Gordon Howard S, Hertz Brian, Amspoker Amber B, Kiefer Lea, Mehta Praveen, Odom Edward, Rajan Suja, Stone Elizabeth, Jones Lindsey, Naik Aanand D

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety Michael E. DeBakey VAMC Houston Texas.

Department of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Nov 18;3(1):e00099. doi: 10.1002/edm2.99. eCollection 2020 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/edm2.99
PMID:31922026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6947690/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal-setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the EPIC intervention with enhanced usual care (EUC) at five clinic sites located in the greater Chicago and Houston areas. We will measure differences in haemoglobin A (HbA) and diabetes distress scale scores among study arms at post-intervention and maintenance (6 months post-intervention). We will evaluate implementation of the intervention across sites using the RE-AIM framework. We will evaluate by comparing the per cent and characteristics of enrolled study participants among all potentially eligible participants in the given clinic population. is reflected by the characteristics of the involved providers and the number of intervention sessions conducted. of EPIC will be evaluated by number of sessions delivered, participants' evaluation of group sessions, and evaluation of quality of goal-setting.

PATIENTS

We randomized 280 participants with equal allocation to EPIC and enhanced usual care (EUC).

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups were similar with the exception that EUC participants were more likely to have prior diabetes education. At baseline, participants were predominately older men who have poorly controlled diabetes (mean HbA = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%]) and moderate levels of diabetes distress (mean DDS = 2.43).

CONCLUSIONS

This hybrid effectiveness-implementation protocol is designed to accelerate the translation of a patient-centred diabetes care intervention from research to clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估一种协作式目标设定干预措施(慢性病护理中的患者赋权[EPIC])在改善血糖控制和糖尿病相关困扰方面的有效性,并将其应用于多个初级保健诊所的常规护理中。

设计

随机对照试验,比较EPIC干预措施与强化常规护理(EUC)在位于芝加哥大区和休斯顿地区的五个诊所的有效性。我们将测量干预后和维持期(干预后6个月)各研究组之间血红蛋白A(HbA)和糖尿病困扰量表评分的差异。我们将使用RE-AIM框架评估该干预措施在各诊所的实施情况。我们将通过比较给定诊所人群中所有潜在合格参与者中登记的研究参与者的百分比和特征来进行评估。这体现在参与提供者的特征和开展的干预课程数量上。EPIC的实施情况将通过授课节数、参与者对小组课程的评价以及目标设定质量的评价来评估。

患者

我们将280名参与者随机分为两组,EPIC组和强化常规护理(EUC)组人数相等。

结果

在基线时,两组相似,只是EUC组参与者更有可能接受过糖尿病前期教育。在基线时,参与者主要是患有糖尿病且控制不佳(平均HbA = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%])和中度糖尿病困扰(平均DDS = 2.43)的老年男性。

结论

这种混合有效性-实施方案旨在加速以患者为中心的糖尿病护理干预措施从研究到临床实践的转化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/389b29e685d3/EDM2-3-e00099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/4bc173b12716/EDM2-3-e00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/389b29e685d3/EDM2-3-e00099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/4bc173b12716/EDM2-3-e00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b8/6947690/389b29e685d3/EDM2-3-e00099-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trial.增强慢性病患者能力以改善糖尿病困扰和血糖控制:一项混合实施-效果临床试验方案
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Nov 18;3(1):e00099. doi: 10.1002/edm2.99. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较协作性目标设定与强化教育在管理糖尿病相关困扰和糖化血红蛋白水平方面的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e229975. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9975.
3
Ascertainment of Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Diabetes Distress Scale-17: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.在糖尿病困扰量表-17 中确定最小临床重要差异:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342950. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42950.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电话传递式协作目标设定和行为激活联合常规护理与强化常规护理对伴发未控制糖尿病的成年抑郁症患者的效果比较:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8634.
7
8
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
9
Behavioural interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: PROPELS three-arm RCT.促进多种族高危糖尿病人群进行身体活动的行为干预:PROPELS 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(77):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25770.
10
A Telehealth Diabetes Intervention for Rural Populations: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对农村人口的远程医疗糖尿病干预措施:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 14;11(6):e34255. doi: 10.2196/34255.

引用本文的文献

1
Ascertainment of Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Diabetes Distress Scale-17: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.在糖尿病困扰量表-17 中确定最小临床重要差异:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342950. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42950.
2
Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较协作性目标设定与强化教育在管理糖尿病相关困扰和糖化血红蛋白水平方面的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e229975. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9975.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities.制定一种具有临床可行性的个体健康优先级识别流程。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1872-1879. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15437. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Qualitative findings on building a partnered approach to implementation of a group-based diabetes intervention in VA primary care.关于在退伍军人事务部初级保健中建立合作方式以实施基于小组的糖尿病干预措施的定性研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e018093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018093.
3
Delivery of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Medically Ill Patients in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.
Developing a program to enhance health professionals' readiness to evidence utilization in diabetes care: A mixed-methods protocol study.
制定一项计划以提高卫生专业人员在糖尿病护理中运用证据的准备程度:一项混合方法的方案研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:36. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_821_20. eCollection 2021.
在初级保健中为患病患者提供简短认知行为疗法:一项实用随机临床试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Sep;32(9):1014-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4101-3. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Health Values and Treatment Goals of Older, Multimorbid Adults Facing Life-Threatening Illness.面临危及生命疾病的老年多病成年人的健康价值观与治疗目标
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Mar;64(3):625-31. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14027.
5
Standards of medical care in diabetes-2015 abridged for primary care providers.《2015年糖尿病医疗护理标准》(初级医疗服务提供者简版)
Clin Diabetes. 2015 Apr;33(2):97-111. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.33.2.97.
6
Health intuitions inform patient-centered care.健康直觉为以患者为中心的护理提供依据。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.915650.
7
The patient centered medical home. A systematic review.患者为中心的医疗之家。系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):169-78. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579.
8
Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035.全球 2013 年糖尿病患病率估计值及 2035 年预测值。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
9
Measuring the quality of patients' goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool.测量患者目标和行动计划的质量:一种新工具的开发和验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 27;12:152. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-152.
10
Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.有效性-实施混合设计:结合临床有效性和实施研究的元素,以提高公共卫生的影响力。
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.