Suppr超能文献

购买需谨慎:肾结石患者膳食补充剂的循证评估。

Buyer Beware: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Dietary Supplements for Nephrolithiasis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2020 Jun;34(6):702-707. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0828. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

Abstract

Numerous dietary supplements claiming to treat or prevent kidney stones have recently been brought to the market. However, the evidence for these claims is not clear. This study assesses the scientific evidence supporting dietary supplements for the treatment and prevention of urinary stone disease. Two online marketplaces (Amazon and Google) were queried for dietary supplements available without a prescription to treat, alleviate, or prevent stone disease. Product labels were reviewed to compile stone-related claims and active ingredients. The 30-day cost of treatment and consumer star rating were assessed. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were queried with labeled ingredients to assess the scientific evidence from published and lay sources. A total of 27 dietary supplements containing 56 ingredients were analyzed. Supplements made a variety of claims, including dissolving stones (12 products, 44%), preventing stone formation (7 products, 26%), and reducing stone symptoms (6 products, 22%). Mean 30-day cost was $32 (range $4-$189). All products were rated highly by consumers (mean 4.2 of 5 stars). Of the 56 ingredients, 9 (16%) had any published studies for use in stone disease, and 5 (9%) had exclusively studies supporting their use. Eighteen scientific publications about the ingredients were identified, of which six showed mixed or no benefit in stone disease. Overall, 18 (67%) supplements contained ingredients with conflicting or absent evidence of benefit. No association was found between product cost or rating and products containing ingredients supported by human or animal studies ( > 0.05). Two-thirds of dietary supplements claiming to treat or prevent kidney stones contain ingredients with conflicting or no scientific evidence to support their claims. Clinicians should counsel stone formers that the effects of most supplements are unknown or unstudied in humans, and that the absence of evidence does not imply absence of potential harm.

摘要

最近有许多声称可以治疗或预防肾结石的膳食补充剂被推向市场。然而,这些说法的证据并不明确。本研究评估了支持治疗和预防尿路结石疾病的膳食补充剂的科学证据。 我们在两个在线市场(亚马逊和谷歌)上查询了无需处方即可治疗、缓解或预防结石病的膳食补充剂。审查产品标签以汇编与结石相关的声明和活性成分。评估了 30 天的治疗费用和消费者星级评分。使用标记成分查询 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar,以评估来自已发表和非专业来源的科学证据。 共分析了 27 种含有 56 种成分的膳食补充剂。补充剂提出了各种声明,包括溶解结石(12 种产品,44%)、预防结石形成(7 种产品,26%)和减少结石症状(6 种产品,22%)。30 天的平均费用为 32 美元(范围为 4-189 美元)。所有产品都受到消费者的高度评价(平均 4.2 颗星)。在 56 种成分中,有 9 种(16%)有任何已发表的研究用于结石病,有 5 种(9%)仅有一种研究支持其使用。确定了 18 项关于这些成分的科学出版物,其中 6 项表明在结石病中没有益处或益处混合。总体而言,18 种(67%)补充剂含有成分,其益处存在冲突或缺乏证据。产品成本或评分与含有人类或动物研究支持成分的产品之间没有关联( > 0.05)。 声称可以治疗或预防肾结石的膳食补充剂中,有三分之二含有成分,其益处存在冲突或缺乏科学证据支持其说法。临床医生应告知结石形成者,大多数补充剂的效果在人类中未知或未经研究,缺乏证据并不意味着没有潜在危害。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验