Endocrine, General and Digestive Surgery Department, CHU de Limoges, Limoges Cedex 87042, France.
Laboratoire EA3842 Contrôle de l'Activation cellulaire, Progression Tumorale et Résistances thérapeutiques «CAPTuR», Faculté de médecine, 2 Rue du Docteur Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 4;2019:5953036. doi: 10.1155/2019/5953036. eCollection 2019.
Despite many advances in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), its incidence and mortality rates continue to make an impact worldwide and in some countries rates are mounting. Over the past decade, liquid biopsies have been the object of fundamental and clinical research with regard to the different steps of CRC patient care such as screening, diagnosis, prognosis, follow-up, and therapeutic response. They are attractive because they are considered to encompass both the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of tumours. They are easily accessible and can be applied to large-scale settings despite the cost. However, liquid biopsies face drawbacks in detection regardless of whether we are testing for circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), or miRNA. This review highlights the different advantages and disadvantages of each type of blood-based biopsy and underlines which specific one may be the most useful and informative for each step of CRC patient care.
尽管在结直肠癌(CRC)的诊断和治疗方面取得了许多进展,但它的发病率和死亡率仍在全球范围内产生影响,在一些国家,其发病率还在上升。在过去的十年中,液体活检一直是基础和临床研究的对象,涉及 CRC 患者护理的不同步骤,如筛查、诊断、预后、随访和治疗反应。它们之所以具有吸引力,是因为它们被认为包含了肿瘤的细胞和分子异质性。它们很容易获得,并且可以在不考虑成本的情况下应用于大规模环境中。然而,液体活检在检测方面存在缺陷,无论我们检测的是循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)、循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)还是 miRNA。这篇综述强调了每种基于血液的活检的不同优缺点,并强调了在 CRC 患者护理的每个步骤中,哪种特定的活检可能是最有用和最具信息性的。