Bartels J, Backhaus J, Kickuth R, Fluck F, König S, Augustin A
Institut für Medizinische Lehre und Ausbildungsforschung Würzburg (IMLA), Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Radiologe. 2020 Apr;60(4):342-350. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-00631-y.
As part of the reform of medical education with a stronger focus on clinical-practical skills, a restructured seminar on interventional radiology was evaluated using a newly developed questionnaire.
Because knowledge in medical education is increasingly transferred by means of application-based teaching formats, a suitable evaluation tool is essential to assess the quality of newly implemented teaching courses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the seminar on interventional radiology and to validate the "Radio-Prak" questionnaire psychometrically in the process.
In the summer semester of 2018, 123 students participating in the newly established seminar were asked to document their satisfaction using the "Radio-Prak" questionnaire with 23 items employing a 5-point Likert scale. We evaluated the questionnaire psychometrically by performing exploratory factor (EFA) and reliability analysis and examined differential validity by group differences.
The newly structured seminar on interventional radiology was met with great approval by students (mean global rating = 1.31, on a grading scale where 1 = very good, 5 = insufficient). EFA revealed that the questionnaire consisted of two main factors "didactic quality" and "practical quality" (five items each, α = 0.68). The seminar was rated more positively when students perceived the time for practice as sufficient (p < 0.05). Furthermore, female students demonstrated significantly less self-esteem, identified by the item "I have improved my spatial ability through the seminar," (p < 0.05).
The "Radio-Prak" questionnaire is both reliable and valid as an instrument to evaluate the quality of a clinical-practical seminar. The students assessed the didactic dimension, but also rated the practical component as important in the assessment.
作为医学教育改革的一部分,更加强调临床实践技能,使用新开发的问卷对重新组织的介入放射学研讨会进行了评估。
由于医学教育中的知识越来越多地通过基于应用的教学形式来传授,因此合适的评估工具对于评估新实施的教学课程的质量至关重要。本研究的目的是评估介入放射学研讨会,并在此过程中对“Radio-Prak”问卷进行心理测量学验证。
在2018年夏季学期,要求123名参加新成立研讨会的学生使用包含23个项目的“Radio-Prak”问卷,采用5点李克特量表记录他们的满意度。我们通过进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和可靠性分析对问卷进行心理测量学评估,并通过组间差异检验差异效度。
重新组织的介入放射学研讨会得到了学生的高度认可(总体平均评分=1.31,评分等级为1=非常好,5=不足)。EFA显示问卷由两个主要因素“教学质量”和“实践质量”组成(各有五个项目,α=0.68)。当学生认为实践时间充足时,对研讨会的评价更积极(p<0.05)。此外,通过“我通过研讨会提高了空间能力”这一项目发现,女生的自信心明显较低(p<0.05)。
“Radio-Prak”问卷作为评估临床实践研讨会质量的工具既可靠又有效。学生们评估了教学维度,但也认为实践部分在评估中很重要。