Bartels Jakob, Backhaus Joy, Kickuth Ralph, Fluck Friederika, Augustin Anne Marie, König Sarah
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Institute for Medical Teaching and Medical Educational Research Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Sep 23;11:23821205241281647. doi: 10.1177/23821205241281647. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Medical education integrates skills training and simulation to prepare students for clinical tasks. A seminar on interventional radiology was restructured to include specific practical training utilizing a 3D-catheter model. We aimed to investigate the complex interplay between student evaluations, their visual-spatial ability and practical performance.
The seminar comprised a short plenary introduction followed by 3 practical training units. Students were tested for their visual-spatial ability and their catheter insertion performance. Students rated the seminar and their interest in the subject. Data were subjected to descriptive, factorial, regression, and moderating analysis.
A total of 141 medical students enrolled in the seminar. They attributed a high didactic and practical quality and expressed great interest in the subject. Male students outperformed females in the cube perspective test. In the practical examination, males needed significantly less time on average (57.9 s) compared to females (73.1 s). However, there were no significant differences in the performance score, with a maximum of 5 attainable points: males 4.61 and females 4.51. The seminar evaluation explained a large portion of the variance (48.6%) in students' interest in the subject. There was a moderating role of practical quality (β = 0.12, < .05) on the link between the cube perspective test and the practical examination: rated high practical quality could partly compensate for low cube perspective scores, enhancing performance in the practical examination.
Well-designed practical courses and a perceived high teaching quality may assist students with deficits in visual-spatial ability to acquire clinical-practical skills. Such initiatives not only enhance learning outcomes across diverse student groups but also stimulate interest in specialized fields like interventional radiology, thereby potentially guiding future career paths in medicine.
医学教育将技能培训与模拟相结合,为学生临床任务做准备。一场介入放射学研讨会进行了重组,纳入了利用3D导管模型的特定实践培训。我们旨在研究学生评估、视觉空间能力与实践表现之间的复杂相互作用。
该研讨会包括简短的全体会议介绍,随后是3个实践培训单元。对学生的视觉空间能力和导管插入表现进行测试。学生对研讨会及其对该主题的兴趣进行评分。数据进行描述性、因子、回归和调节分析。
共有141名医学生参加了该研讨会。他们认为该研讨会具有很高的教学和实践质量,并对该主题表现出极大兴趣。在立方体视角测试中,男生表现优于女生。在实践考试中,男生平均所需时间(57.9秒)明显少于女生(73.1秒)。然而,在表现得分上没有显著差异,满分5分:男生4.61分,女生4.51分。研讨会评估解释了学生对该主题兴趣差异的很大一部分(48.6%)。实践质量对立方体视角测试与实践考试之间的联系具有调节作用(β = 0.12,P <.05):实践质量评分高可以部分弥补立方体视角得分低的情况,提高实践考试中的表现。
精心设计的实践课程和较高的教学质量感知可能有助于视觉空间能力有缺陷的学生获得临床实践技能。此类举措不仅能提高不同学生群体的学习成果,还能激发对介入放射学等专业领域的兴趣,从而可能引导未来的医学职业道路。