Trisi Paolo, Falco Antonello, Berardini Marco
Biomaterial Clinical and Histological Research Association, Private Practice, Via Galilei 8, 65122, Pescara, Italy.
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jan 15;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0198-y.
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate a simplified implant site preparation technique to preserve bone bulk and enhance osseointegration using a new conical self-tapping implant in cancellous bone.
Ten Expander® 3.8 × 10 mm implants (NoDrill®, Milano, Italy) were inserted in the right side (test group) of sheep's iliac crest using only the pilot drill 1.8 mm in diameter. Ten 3.8 × 10 mm Dynamix® implants (Cortex, Shlomi, Israel) were inserted in the right side (control group) of the same animals following the drilling protocol provided by the manufacturer. Histological, histomorphometric, and biomechanical analyses were performed after 2 months.
Implants that belonged to the test group showed a %BIC of 70.91 ± 7.95 while the control group implants had a %BIC value of 49.33 ± 10.73. The %BV was 41.83 ± 6.30 in the test group and 29.61 ± 5.05 in the control group. These differences were statistically significant. A phenomenon of osseocorticalization, characterized by more bone volume percentage around implant area than in the neighboring areas, caused by implant threads geometry, was evident in the test group.
This surgical protocol allows to insert an innovative fixture geometry in low-density bone using only a pilot drill. This technique demonstrated many clinical and histological advantages with respect to standard implant drilling procedures and classical implant geometry.
本文旨在评估一种简化的种植位点预备技术,该技术使用新型锥形自攻种植体,在松质骨中保留骨量并增强骨结合。
在绵羊髂嵴右侧(试验组)仅使用直径1.8 mm的导向钻植入10枚Expander® 3.8×10 mm种植体(NoDrill®,意大利米兰)。按照制造商提供的钻孔方案,在同一动物的右侧(对照组)植入10枚3.8×10 mm Dynamix®种植体(以色列施洛米Cortex公司)。2个月后进行组织学、组织形态计量学和生物力学分析。
试验组种植体的骨结合率(%BIC)为70.91±7.95,而对照组种植体的%BIC值为49.33±10.73。试验组的骨体积百分比(%BV)为41.83±6.30,对照组为29.61±5.05。这些差异具有统计学意义。在试验组中,由种植体螺纹几何形状导致的骨皮质化现象明显,其特征是种植体周围区域的骨体积百分比高于相邻区域。
该手术方案允许仅使用导向钻在低密度骨中植入创新的种植体几何形状。与标准种植体钻孔程序和传统种植体几何形状相比,该技术显示出许多临床和组织学优势。