Abboud Marcus, Delgado-Ruiz Rafael Arcesio, Kucine Allan, Rugova Sihana, Balanta Julian, Calvo-Guirado Jose Luis
Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e472-85. doi: 10.1111/cid.12273. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
To evaluate an experimental multistepped drill for single-stage implant site preparation by means of real-time analysis of thermal variations during and postdrilling, and by implant stability evaluation.
Temperature and time were recorded in real time by paired microprobe thermocouples during simulated osteotomy in type 2 bone similes at the cortical and cancellous zones. Three different drilling groups with a new multistepped drill design were compared: Control (2-mm diameter pilot drill + 3.3-mm three-stepped drill + 4.1-mm three-stepped drill); Test A (3.3-mm three-stepped drill); and Test B (4.1-mm three-stepped drill). Implants were inserted, and implant stability was evaluated with the Perio Test Value (PTV). Two-way anova was used to test the independent effects of osteotomy and implant diameter on temperature and stability.
All the drills induced thermal changes without significant differences between groups (p > .05). Drilling in cortical bone produced significant increase of the temperatures in a range of 1.8 ± 0.9°C compared with drilling in cancellous bone (p < .05). ΔT temperatures were significantly higher for test groups in cortical and cancellous bone (p < .05); ΔT10 for all groups showed a reduction of the temperature in a range of 1.7 ± 0.3°C without significant differences between groups (p > .05); the mean time to accomplish drilling was significantly longer in the control group (p < .05); test groups took 10 ± 0.3 seconds less to reach the required drilling depth. PTV values were higher in test groups compared with controls (p < .05).
The multistepped drills used for single-stage implant site preparation Increase temperature as in comparison with a conventional incremental protocol; Induce the temperature increment in cortical bone compared with the cancellous bone; Reduce drilling time when a multistepped drill is used alone; and Increase implant stability twofold compared with a conventional incremental protocol.
通过对钻孔过程中和钻孔后热变化的实时分析以及植入物稳定性评估,评价一种用于单阶段种植位点预备的实验性多步骤钻头。
在2型骨模拟物的皮质骨和松质骨区域进行模拟截骨术时,通过配对的微探针热电偶实时记录温度和时间。比较了三种采用新型多步骤钻头设计的不同钻孔组:对照组(2毫米直径导向钻+3.3毫米三步骤钻+4.1毫米三步骤钻);试验A组(3.3毫米三步骤钻);试验B组(4.1毫米三步骤钻)。植入种植体,并使用牙周探测值(PTV)评估种植体稳定性。采用双向方差分析来检验截骨术和种植体直径对温度和稳定性的独立影响。
所有钻头均引起热变化,各钻孔组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。与在松质骨中钻孔相比,在皮质骨中钻孔导致温度显著升高,升高范围为1.8±0.9℃(p<0.05)。试验组在皮质骨和松质骨中的ΔT温度显著更高(p<0.05);所有组的ΔT10显示温度降低,降低范围为1.7±0.3℃,各钻孔组之间无显著差异(p>0.05);对照组完成钻孔的平均时间显著更长(p<0.05);试验组达到所需钻孔深度的时间少10±0.3秒。试验组的PTV值高于对照组(p<0.05)。
用于单阶段种植位点预备的多步骤钻头与传统的递增方案相比会使温度升高;与松质骨相比,在皮质骨中会引起温度升高;单独使用多步骤钻头时可减少钻孔时间;与传统的递增方案相比,可使种植体稳定性提高两倍。