Suppr超能文献

虚构阅读对社会认知有较小的积极影响:一项元分析。

Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital.

Department of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1713-1727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000395. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

Scholars from both the social sciences and the humanities have credited fiction reading with a range of positive real-world social effects. Research in psychology has suggested that readers may make good citizens because fiction reading is associated with better social cognition. But does fiction reading causally improve social cognition? Here, we meta-analyze extant published and unpublished experimental data to address this question. Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis of 53 effect sizes from 14 studies demonstrated that it does: compared to nonfiction reading and no reading, fiction reading leads to a small, statistically significant improvement in social-cognitive performance (g = .15-.16). This effect is robust across sensitivity analyses and does not appear to be the result of publication bias. We recommend that in future work, researchers use more robust reading manipulations, assess whether the effects transfer to improved real-world social functioning, and investigate mechanisms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

来自社会科学和人文学科的学者都将小说阅读归功于一系列积极的现实世界的社会影响。心理学研究表明,读者可能会成为更好的公民,因为小说阅读与更好的社会认知有关。但是,小说阅读是否会对社会认知产生因果影响呢?在这里,我们对已发表和未发表的实验数据进行了荟萃分析,以解决这个问题。对 14 项研究中的 53 个效应大小进行多层次随机效应荟萃分析表明,小说阅读确实可以带来小而显著的社会认知表现的提升(g =.15-.16)。这种效应在敏感性分析中是稳健的,而且似乎不是出版偏差的结果。我们建议在未来的研究中,研究人员使用更稳健的阅读操作,评估这些效果是否可以转移到改善现实世界的社会功能,并研究其机制。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验