Suppr超能文献

中文译文: 在中国超重或肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者中,使用甘精胰岛素 100U/ml 高起始剂量与标准起始剂量治疗的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验(BEYOND VII)的结果。

Higher versus standard starting dose of insulin glargine 100 U/mL in overweight or obese Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial (BEYOND VII).

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Panjin Central Hospital, Panjin, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 May;22(5):838-846. doi: 10.1111/dom.13967. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Abstract

AIM

To determine the safety of a higher starting dose of basal insulin in overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This 16-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial enrolled adults with T2D (body mass index 25-40 kg/m ) and suboptimal glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5-11.0% [58-97 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] >9.0 mmol/L) with two to three oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs at 51 centres in China. Patients were randomized (1:1) to a higher (0.3 U/kg) or standard (0.2 U/kg) starting dose of insulin glargine 100 U/mL, which was then titrated to achieve a self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with ≥1 episode of overall confirmed hypoglycaemia (≤3.9 mmol/L or severe).

RESULTS

At the end of study (n = 866), 11.0% patients treated with the 0.3 U/kg starting insulin dose experienced overall confirmed hypoglycaemia versus 8.6% of patients treated with 0.2 U/kg (estimated difference 2.1%, 95% confidence interval - 1.68, 5.89). The proportions of patients with symptomatic (9.8% vs 7.0%; P = 0.128) and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (2.7% vs 1.2%; P = 0.102) were similar in the two groups. There were no events of severe hypoglycaemia or FBG <3.0 mmol/L during the 16-week treatment, and achievement of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (37.1% vs 37.1%) or FPG <5.6 mmol/L (15.9% vs 16.3%), <6.1 mmol/L (27.6% vs 26.1%), or < 7.0 mmol/L (48.8% vs 48.3%) without hypoglycaemia were comparable in the two groups. Moreover, the mean time was shorter (4.53, 3.95 and 2.74 weeks vs 5.51, 5.21 and 3.64 weeks) and number of titrations was lower (3.5, 3.0 and 2.0 vs 4.3, 4.0 and 2.8) to achieve self-monitored FBG targets of <5.6, <6.1 and <7.0 mmol/L in the higher versus the standard insulin dose group (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among overweight/obese patients with T2D, a higher insulin starting dose was as safe as the standard starting dose, and self-monitored FBG targets were achieved earlier with the higher versus the standard dose.

摘要

目的

评估超重/肥胖 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者起始使用较高剂量基础胰岛素的安全性。

材料和方法

这是一项为期 16 周、随机、多中心、开放性临床试验,共纳入 51 家中心的 866 名 T2D 患者(体重指数 25-40kg/m²,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)7.5-11.0%[58-97mmol/mol],空腹血糖(FPG)>9.0mmol/L,且使用两种或三种口服降糖药治疗但血糖控制仍不佳)。患者按 1:1 随机分为起始胰岛素剂量较高(0.3U/kg)或标准(0.2U/kg)的两组,分别接受胰岛素甘精 100U/mL 治疗,随后根据自我监测的空腹血糖(FBG)滴定剂量,目标 FBG 为 4.4-5.6mmol/L。主要终点为总体确证性低血糖(≤3.9mmol/L 或严重低血糖)发作≥1 次的患者比例。

结果

研究结束时(n=866),起始胰岛素剂量为 0.3U/kg 的患者中有 11.0%发生总体确证性低血糖,而起始胰岛素剂量为 0.2U/kg 的患者中这一比例为 8.6%(估计差值 2.1%,95%置信区间 -1.68,5.89)。两组患者的症状性低血糖(9.8% vs 7.0%;P=0.128)和夜间低血糖(2.7% vs 1.2%;P=0.102)比例相似。在 16 周治疗期间,两组均无严重低血糖或 FBG<3.0mmol/L 事件发生,HbA1c<7.0%(53mmol/mol)(37.1% vs 37.1%)或 FPG<5.6mmol/L(15.9% vs 16.3%)、<6.1mmol/L(27.6% vs 26.1%)或<7.0mmol/L(48.8% vs 48.3%)且无低血糖的患者比例也相似。此外,与起始胰岛素剂量标准组相比,较高剂量组达到 FBG<5.6mmol/L、<6.1mmol/L 和<7.0mmol/L 的目标时间更短[4.53、3.95 和 2.74 周 vs 5.51、5.21 和 3.64 周],所需的滴定次数更少[3.5、3.0 和 2.0 次 vs 4.3、4.0 和 2.8 次](均 P<0.01)。

结论

在超重/肥胖的 T2D 患者中,起始使用较高剂量胰岛素与标准起始剂量同样安全,且较高剂量组较标准剂量组更早达到自我监测的 FBG 目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0d/7187195/6ec4c3962041/DOM-22-838-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验