IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021 Dec;51(12):5871-5882. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2962095. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
To address the situation where the complete consistency is unnecessary, a stepwise optimization model-based method for testing the acceptably additive consistency (AAC) of hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) is introduced. Then, an AAC concept for HFPRs is defined. Meanwhile, incomplete HFPRs (iHFPRs) are discussed and a series of optimization models to acquire complete HFPRs is constructed. If the consistency is unacceptable, an optimization model for revising unacceptably consistent HFPRs under the conditions of the AAC and maximizing the ordinal consistency (OC) is offered. Subsequently, a model for minimizing the number of adjusted variables is presented. Considering the weighting information and the consensus for group decision making (GDM), the weights of fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) obtained from each individual HFPR and the decision makers (DMs) are determined using the distance measure. With regard to the consensus, two models for reaching the consensus requirement and minimizing the amount of revised variables are separately constructed, which are both based on the analysis of maximizing the OC. Furthermore, the thresholds of the additive consistency and the consensus are studied using the Monte Carlo simulation method. A GDM algorithm with HFPRs is offered. Finally, an example and comparison are provided to show the efficiency of the new procedure.
为了解决完全一致性不必要的情况,引入了一种基于逐步优化模型的方法来测试犹豫模糊偏好关系(HFPR)的可接受加性一致性(AAC)。然后,定义了 HFPR 的 AAC 概念。同时,讨论了不完整的 HFPR(iHFPR),并构建了一系列获取完整 HFPR 的优化模型。如果一致性不可接受,则提供了一个在 AAC 条件下修订不可接受一致的 HFPR 并最大化有序一致性(OC)的优化模型。随后,提出了一个最小化调整变量数量的模型。考虑到权重信息和群体决策的一致性,使用距离测度确定从每个单独的 HFPR 和决策者(DM)获得的模糊偏好关系(FPR)的权重。关于一致性,构建了两个基于最大化 OC 分析的达成一致性要求和最小化修订变量数量的模型。此外,使用蒙特卡罗模拟方法研究了加性一致性和一致性的阈值。提出了一种带有 HFPR 的 GDM 算法。最后,提供了一个示例和比较,以显示新程序的效率。