Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NeuroTech Center, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Biomaterials. 2020 Mar;234:119767. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119767. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
Intracortical microelectrode implants can generate a tissue response hallmarked by glial scarring and neuron cell death within 100-150 μm of the biomaterial device. Many have proposed that any performance decline in intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) due to this foreign body tissue response could be offset by increasing the stimulation amplitude. The mechanisms of this approach are unclear, however, as there has not been consensus on how increasing amplitude affects the spatial and temporal recruitment patterns of ICMS.
We clarify these unknowns using in vivo two-photon imaging of mice transgenically expressing the calcium sensor GCaMP6s in Thy1 neurons or virally expressing the glutamate sensor iGluSnFr in neurons. Calcium and neurotransmitter activity are tracked in the neuronal somas and neuropil during long-train stimulation in Layer II/III of somatosensory cortex.
Neural calcium activity and glutamate release are dense and strongest within 20-40 μm around the electrode, falling off with distance from the electrode. Neuronal calcium increases with higher amplitude stimulations. During prolonged stimulation trains, a sub-population of somas fail to maintain calcium activity. Interestingly, neuropil calcium activity is 3-fold less correlated to somatic calcium activity for cells that drop-out during the long stimulation train compared to cells that sustain activity throughout the train. Glutamate release is apparent only within 20 μm of the electrode and is sustained for at least 10s after cessation of the 15 and 20 μA stimulation train, but not lower amplitudes.
These results demonstrate that increasing amplitude can increase the radius and intensity of neural recruitment, but it also alters the temporal response of some neurons. Further, dense glutamate release is highest within the first 20 μm of the electrode site even at high amplitudes, suggesting that there may be spatial limitations to the amplitude parameter space. The glutamate elevation outlasts stimulation, suggesting that high-amplitude stimulation may affect neurotransmitter re-uptake. This ultimately suggests that increasing the amplitude of ICMS device stimulation may fundamentally alter the temporal neural response, which could have implications for using amplitude to improve the ICMS effect or "offset" the effects of glial scarring.
皮质内微电极植入物会在距生物材料装置 100-150μm 范围内引发以神经胶质瘢痕和神经元细胞死亡为特征的组织反应。许多人认为,由于这种异物组织反应,任何导致皮质内微刺激(ICMS)性能下降的因素都可以通过增加刺激幅度来弥补。然而,这种方法的机制尚不清楚,因为对于增加幅度如何影响 ICMS 的空间和时间招募模式,尚未达成共识。
我们使用在体双光子成像技术,对在 Thyl 神经元中转基因表达钙传感器 GCaMP6s 或在神经元中病毒表达谷氨酸传感器 iGluSnFr 的小鼠进行研究,从而阐明了这些未知因素。在感觉皮层 II/III 层进行长时程刺激时,我们跟踪神经元胞体和神经突中的钙和神经递质活性。
在距电极 20-40μm 范围内,电极周围的神经元钙活性和谷氨酸释放最为密集和强烈,随着与电极距离的增加而减弱。神经元钙活性随刺激幅度的增加而增加。在长时间刺激过程中,亚群神经元胞体无法维持钙活性。有趣的是,与在整个刺激过程中保持活性的细胞相比,在长时间刺激过程中失活的细胞,其神经突钙活性与体细胞钙活性的相关性降低了 3 倍。只有在电极 20μm 范围内才能检测到谷氨酸释放,并且在停止 15 和 20μA 刺激后,谷氨酸释放至少持续 10s,但在较低的幅度下则不会。
这些结果表明,增加幅度可以增加神经募集的半径和强度,但也会改变一些神经元的时间响应。此外,即使在高幅度下,电极部位的谷氨酸释放也最高,在 20μm 以内,这表明振幅参数空间可能存在空间限制。谷氨酸的升高持续时间超过刺激时间,这表明高幅度刺激可能会影响神经递质再摄取。这最终表明,增加 ICMS 装置刺激的幅度可能会从根本上改变神经的时间响应,这可能会对使用幅度来改善 ICMS 效果或“抵消”神经胶质瘢痕的影响产生影响。