Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Neurosciences (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Schizophrenia Program (Proesq), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Neurosciences (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Schizophrenia Program (Proesq), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Schizophr Res. 2020 Apr;218:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
Early identification of symptoms that can predict treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) could help clinicians to avoid delays in clozapine therapy. This study aims to investigate symptom patterns that could predict TRS using a discovery/replication study design. First, we followed a cohort of inpatients with schizophrenia (n = 164) in which the most discriminative items at baseline of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were determined using logistic regression with TRS status as an outcome. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, we tested the prediction performance of multiple combinations of the identified items. The same items' combination was tested in an independent replication sample of (n = 207) outpatients with schizophrenia. In the discovery sample, the best combination to predict TRS at the discharge was the sum of three baseline PANSS items - conceptual disorganization (P2), difficulty in abstract thinking (N5), and unusual thought content (G9). The P2 + N5 + G9 model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881, a sensitivity of 77.8%, and a specificity of 83.3%. In the outpatient sample, the model P2 + N5 + G9 predictive accuracy for TRS was only in the range of "acceptable" with an AUC of 0.756 and sensitivity of 72.3% and a specificity of 74.4%. Overall, the P2 + N5 + G9 model corresponds to the construct of formal thought disorder composed of disorganized thinking, concrete thinking, and bizarre-idiosyncratic thinking. Pronounced levels of these symptoms are easily identifiable in clinical practice and may be a feasible strategy in TRS. Replicating in first-episode cohorts is desirable to understand the likely clinical utility.
早期识别能够预测治疗抵抗性精神分裂症(TRS)的症状可以帮助临床医生避免氯氮平治疗的延误。本研究旨在通过发现/复制研究设计,研究能够预测 TRS 的症状模式。首先,我们对 164 例住院精神分裂症患者进行了随访,使用逻辑回归根据 TRS 状态作为结果,确定了基线阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)中最具鉴别力的项目。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,我们测试了多个识别项目组合的预测性能。在精神分裂症门诊患者的独立复制样本(n=207)中测试了相同项目的组合。在发现样本中,预测出院时 TRS 的最佳组合是三个基线 PANSS 项目的总和 - 概念混乱(P2)、抽象思维困难(N5)和异常思维内容(G9)。P2+N5+G9 模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.881,灵敏度为 77.8%,特异性为 83.3%。在门诊患者样本中,P2+N5+G9 对 TRS 的预测准确性仅处于“可接受”范围内,AUC 为 0.756,灵敏度为 72.3%,特异性为 74.4%。总体而言,P2+N5+G9 模型对应于由思维混乱、具体思维和奇异-独特思维组成的形式思维障碍的结构。这些症状的明显程度在临床上很容易识别,可能是 TRS 的一种可行策略。在首次发作队列中复制是了解可能的临床效用的理想选择。