Weaver Jordan S, Khosravani Ali, Castillo Andrew, Kalidindi Surya R
1George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA USA.
2Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM USA.
Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2016;5(1):192-211. doi: 10.1186/s40192-016-0054-3. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Recent spherical nanoindentation protocols have proven robust at capturing the local elastic-plastic response of polycrystalline metal samples at length scales much smaller than the grain size. In this work, we extend these protocols to length scales that include multiple grains to recover microindentation stress-strain curves. These new protocols are first established in this paper and then demonstrated for Al-6061 by comparing the measured indentation stress-strain curves with the corresponding measurements from uniaxial tension tests. More specifically, the scaling factors between the uniaxial yield strength and the indentation yield strength was determined to be about 1.9, which is significantly lower than the value of 2.8 used commonly in literature. The reasons for this difference are discussed. Second, the benefits of these new protocols in facilitating high throughput exploration of process-property relationships are demonstrated through a simple case study.
最近的球形纳米压痕方法已被证明在捕获多晶金属样品在远小于晶粒尺寸的长度尺度上的局部弹塑性响应方面具有稳健性。在这项工作中,我们将这些方法扩展到包含多个晶粒的长度尺度,以恢复微压痕应力-应变曲线。这些新方法首先在本文中建立,然后通过将测量的压痕应力-应变曲线与单轴拉伸试验的相应测量结果进行比较,对Al-6061进行了验证。更具体地说,单轴屈服强度与压痕屈服强度之间的比例因子确定为约1.9,这明显低于文献中常用的2.8的值。讨论了这种差异的原因。其次,通过一个简单的案例研究展示了这些新方法在促进工艺-性能关系的高通量探索方面的优势。