Linguistics and English Language, University of Edinburgh.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University.
Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;44(1):e12808. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12808.
Prior psychological work on Gricean implicature has revealed much about how listeners infer (comprehension) but little about how speakers imply (production). This is surprising given the inherent link between the two. This study aimed to obtain a more integral understanding of implicatures by investigating the processes that are shared between inference and implication. In two experiments, a participant and a confederate engaged in a dialogue game that invited the use of implicatures. In each there was a global priming manipulation, in which a confederate predominantly used implicit or explicit utterances, and a local priming manipulation, in which the utterance structure varied from trial to trial. Participants could choose whether to imply or use an explicit expression. Our results revealed that speaker and listener align on their use of implicatures. We interpret the local priming results as providing evidence of shared implicature representations between speaker and listener, and the global priming results as a form of audience design. We also present a model of implicature production that explains our findings.
先前关于格莱斯含意的心理学研究揭示了很多关于听话人如何推断(理解)的信息,但关于说话人如何暗示(生成)的信息却很少。考虑到这两者之间的内在联系,这令人惊讶。本研究旨在通过调查推断和暗示之间共享的过程,获得对含意的更完整理解。在两项实验中,一名参与者和一名同伙进行了对话游戏,其中邀请使用含意。在每一个实验中,都有一个全局启动操作,其中同伙主要使用隐含或显式的话语,以及一个局部启动操作,其中话语结构在每次试验中都有所不同。参与者可以选择暗示或使用显式表达。我们的结果表明,说话者和听话者在使用含意方面是一致的。我们将局部启动结果解释为说话者和听话者之间共享含意表示的证据,而全局启动结果则是一种观众设计。我们还提出了一个含意生成模型,解释了我们的发现。