• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推导含义时的视角转换:倾听者的视角也很重要。

Perspective-taking in deriving implicatures: The listener's perspective is important too.

作者信息

Katsos Napoleon, de Linares Blanche Gonzales, Ostashchenko Ekaterina, Wilson Elspeth

机构信息

Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105582. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105582. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105582
PMID:37678083
Abstract

Theories of meaning propose that listeners understand a speaker's implicit meaning thanks to mutually assumed norms of conversation that take into account what the speaker has said, as well as contextual factors, including what the speaker knows. Emerging psycholinguistic research shows that listeners derive a particular kind of implicit meaning, quantity implicatures, when their speaker is knowledgeable about the situation but tend to not derive it otherwise. In this article we focus on if and how listeners use the knowledge that is available only to themselves, i.e., the listener's perspective, while deriving implicatures. To do so, we explore the derivation of ad hoc quantity implicature in situations where the speaker does or does not have full knowledge, while, in the latter case, the listener has two types of privileged knowledge. Two versions of a study with neurotypical English-speaking adults show that listeners are influenced by their own perspective while deriving implicatures, depending on the type of knowledge available to them. We discuss the implications of these findings for models of pragmatic interpretative strategies.

摘要

意义理论认为,听众能够理解说话者的隐含意义,这要归功于相互认可的会话规范,这些规范考虑了说话者所说的内容以及语境因素,包括说话者所知道的信息。新兴的心理语言学研究表明,当说话者对情况有所了解时,听众会得出一种特定类型的隐含意义,即数量含义,但在其他情况下则不会得出。在本文中,我们关注听众在推导含义时是否以及如何运用只有他们自己才拥有的知识,即听众的视角。为此,我们探讨了在说话者有或没有全面了解情况的情形下临时数量含义的推导,而在后一种情况下,听众拥有两种类型的特权知识。一项针对以英语为母语的神经正常成年人的研究的两个版本表明,听众在推导含义时会受到自身视角的影响,这取决于他们所拥有的知识类型。我们讨论了这些发现对语用解释策略模型的启示。

相似文献

1
Perspective-taking in deriving implicatures: The listener's perspective is important too.推导含义时的视角转换:倾听者的视角也很重要。
Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105582. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105582. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences.语调与语用充实:语调如何限制临时等级推理
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):200-223. doi: 10.1177/0023830917716101.
3
Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences.四岁儿童将说话者知识纳入语用推理。
Dev Sci. 2020 May;23(3):e12920. doi: 10.1111/desc.12920. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
Perceptual Cue Weighting Is Influenced by the Listener's Gender and Subjective Evaluations of the Speaker: The Case of English Stop Voicing.感知线索加权受听众性别和对说话者的主观评价影响:以英语塞音浊化为例。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 20;13:840291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840291. eCollection 2022.
5
Reading between the lines: Listener's vmPFC simulates speaker cooperative choices in communication games.字里行间的解读:听众的腹内侧前额叶皮层在交流游戏中模拟说话者的合作选择。
Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 3;7(10). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe6276. Print 2021 Mar.
6
I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.我知道你可能会说什么:听众对不确定性表达的可变使用的适应。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104285. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104285. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Neural correlates of fine-grained meaning distinctions: An fMRI investigation of scalar quantifiers.细粒度语义区分的神经关联:对标量量词的功能磁共振成像研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):3848-3864. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23633. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Complex Inferential Processes Are Needed for Implicature Comprehension, but Not for Implicature Production.隐含意义理解需要复杂的推理过程,但隐含意义产生则不需要。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 5;11:556667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556667. eCollection 2020.
9
Taking the epistemic step: toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures.采取认知步骤:构建会话含意在线获取模式。
Cognition. 2013 Mar;126(3):423-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
The role of salience in young children's processing of ad hoc implicatures.突显在幼儿处理即兴含义中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;186:99-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
No one-to-one mapping between typologies of pragmatic relations and models of pragmatic processing: a case study with mentalizing.语用关系类型与语用加工模型之间不存在一一对应关系:一项关于心理理论的案例研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Aug 14;380(1932):20230501. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0501.
2
Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action.语用学作为关于意向行动的社会推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Feb 8;9:290-304. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00191. eCollection 2025.