Suppr超能文献

与通过持续非卧床腹膜透析和非卧床腹膜透析循环器治疗的腹膜透析患者的实测吸收相比,预测腹膜透析液葡萄糖吸收的差异。

Differences in predicting glucose absorption from peritoneal dialysate compared to measured absorption in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and ambulatory peritoneal dialysis cyclers.

作者信息

Tangwonglert Theerasak, Davenport Andrew

机构信息

Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

UCL Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2020 Jul;43(7):461-467. doi: 10.1177/0391398819899669. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucose-containing peritoneal dialysates are used to generate an osmotic gradient for the convective removal of water and sodium. Predictive equations were developed to estimate glucose absorption without having to formally measure changes in dialysate glucose. In view of the changes in peritoneal dialysis prescriptions over time, we compared predicted and measured glucose absorption.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: We measured peritoneal glucose losses when peritoneal dialysis patients attended their first assessment of peritoneal membrane function, and compared this to glucose exposure and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative, Grodstein and Bodnar predictive equations.

RESULTS

We studied 689 patients; 329 (56.9%) males, 53 (37.1%) diabetics, with mean age 57.1 ± 16.2 years, with 186 treated by automated peritoneal dialysis cyclers and 377 by automated peritoneal dialysis with a daytime icodextrin exchange and 126 by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Using Bland -Altman analysis, all equations demonstrated systematic bias overestimating glucose absorption with increasing glucose absorption. For continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative formula underestimated glucose absorption (bias 188 (-39 to 437) mmol/day, as did Grodstein (bias 37.9 (-105 to 29) mmol/day, whereas mean bias for Bodnar was -29 (-130 to 180)). There was systematic overestimation for all equations for both automated peritoneal dialysis with and without a daytime exchange, with increasing bias with greater glucose absorption.

CONCLUSION

Although formally measuring peritoneal glucose absorption is time consuming and requires patient co-operation, current predictive equations overestimate glucose absorption and do not provide accurate estimations of glucose absorption particularly for automated peritoneal dialysis patients.

摘要

背景与目的

含葡萄糖的腹膜透析液用于产生渗透梯度,以对流方式清除水和钠。已开发出预测方程来估算葡萄糖吸收量,而无需正式测量透析液葡萄糖的变化。鉴于腹膜透析处方随时间的变化,我们比较了预测的和实测的葡萄糖吸收情况。

对象/方法:我们测量了腹膜透析患者首次评估腹膜功能时的腹膜葡萄糖损失,并将其与葡萄糖暴露量以及肾脏病预后质量倡议(Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative)、格罗德斯坦(Grodstein)和博德纳(Bodnar)预测方程进行比较。

结果

我们研究了689例患者;男性329例(56.9%),糖尿病患者53例(37.1%),平均年龄57.1±16.2岁,其中186例采用自动腹膜透析机治疗,377例采用日间艾考糊精交换的自动腹膜透析治疗,126例采用持续性非卧床腹膜透析治疗。使用布兰德-奥特曼(Bland -Altman)分析,所有方程均显示随着葡萄糖吸收量增加,存在系统性偏差,高估了葡萄糖吸收量。对于持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者,肾脏病预后质量倡议公式低估了葡萄糖吸收量(偏差为188(-39至437)mmol/天),格罗德斯坦公式也是如此(偏差为37.9(-105至29)mmol/天),而博德纳公式的平均偏差为-29(-130至180)。对于有或没有日间交换的自动腹膜透析,所有方程均存在系统性高估,且随着葡萄糖吸收量增加偏差增大。

结论

尽管正式测量腹膜葡萄糖吸收量既耗时又需要患者配合,但目前的预测方程高估了葡萄糖吸收量,不能准确估算葡萄糖吸收量,尤其是对于自动腹膜透析患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验