• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质电生理证据表明大脑功能网络具有个体特异性的时间组织方式。

Cortical electrophysiological evidence for individual-specific temporal organization of brain functional networks.

机构信息

Beijing City Key Lab for Medical Physics and Engineering, Institution of Heavy Ion Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Center for MRI Research, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jun 1;41(8):2160-2172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24937. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.24937
PMID:31961469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7267903/
Abstract

The human brain has been demonstrated to rapidly and continuously form and dissolve networks on a subsecond timescale, offering effective and essential substrates for cognitive processes. Understanding how the dynamic organization of brain functional networks on a subsecond level varies across individuals is, therefore, of great interest for personalized neuroscience. However, it remains unclear whether features of such rapid network organization are reliably unique and stable in single subjects and, therefore, can be used in characterizing individual networks. Here, we used two sets of 5-min magnetoencephalography (MEG) resting data from 39 healthy subjects over two consecutive days and modeled the spontaneous brain activity as recurring networks fast shifting between each other in a coordinated manner. MEG cortical maps were obtained through source reconstruction using the beamformer method and subjects' temporal structure of recurring networks was obtained via the Hidden Markov Model. Individual organization of dynamic brain activity was quantified with the features of the network-switching pattern (i.e., transition probability and mean interval time) and the time-allocation mode (i.e., fractional occupancy and mean lifetime). Using these features, we were able to identify subjects from the group with significant accuracies (~40% on average in 0.5-48 Hz). Notably, the default mode network displayed a distinguishable pattern, being the least frequently visited network with the longest duration for each visit. Together, we provide initial evidence suggesting that the rapid dynamic temporal organization of brain networks achieved in electrophysiology is intrinsic and subject specific.

摘要

人类大脑被证明能够在亚秒时间尺度上快速而连续地形成和瓦解网络,为认知过程提供了有效且必要的基础。因此,了解亚秒级大脑功能网络的动态组织在个体之间如何变化,对于个性化神经科学非常重要。然而,目前尚不清楚这种快速网络组织的特征在单个主体中是否可靠且稳定,因此是否可以用于描述个体网络。在这里,我们使用了两组来自 39 名健康受试者的连续两天的 5 分钟脑磁图 (MEG) 静息数据,并通过模型将自发脑活动模拟为在协调方式下快速相互切换的周期性网络。使用波束形成器方法通过源重建获得 MEG 皮质图,通过隐马尔可夫模型获得受试者周期性网络的时间结构。通过网络切换模式(即转移概率和平均间隔时间)和时间分配模式(即分数占用和平均寿命)的特征来量化动态大脑活动的个体组织。使用这些特征,我们能够以较高的准确率(在 0.5-48Hz 频段内平均约为 40%)从组中识别出个体。值得注意的是,默认模式网络显示出可区分的模式,是访问频率最低但每次访问持续时间最长的网络。总之,我们提供了初步证据表明,在电生理学中实现的大脑网络的快速动态时间组织是内在的且具有个体特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/f309ab0dd715/HBM-41-2160-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/f46afbc89962/HBM-41-2160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/a7c70b18a31d/HBM-41-2160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/681e12d923f4/HBM-41-2160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/f309ab0dd715/HBM-41-2160-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/f46afbc89962/HBM-41-2160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/a7c70b18a31d/HBM-41-2160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/681e12d923f4/HBM-41-2160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fc/7267903/f309ab0dd715/HBM-41-2160-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cortical electrophysiological evidence for individual-specific temporal organization of brain functional networks.皮质电生理证据表明大脑功能网络具有个体特异性的时间组织方式。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jun 1;41(8):2160-2172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24937. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Sex-differences in network level brain dynamics associated with pain sensitivity and pain interference.性别差异在与疼痛敏感性和疼痛干扰相关的网络水平大脑动力学中的作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Feb 15;42(3):598-614. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25245. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
Frequency-dependent functional connectivity in resting state networks.静息态网络中频率相关的功能连接
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec 15;41(18):5187-5198. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25184. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Dynamic functioning of transient resting-state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project.动态功能连接组学项目中暂态静息状态共激活网络的功能。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Feb 1;41(2):373-387. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24808. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.基于动态功能连接的脑区划分能更好地捕捉内在网络动态。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Apr 1;42(5):1416-1433. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25303. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
6
Community structure of the creative brain at rest.静息状态下创造性大脑的群落结构。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116578. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116578. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.语言产生中与任务和刺激相关的皮层网络:探索基于脑磁图(MEG)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的功能连接的相似性。
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
8
State-independent and state-dependent patterns in the rat default mode network.大鼠默认模式网络中的状态无关和状态相关模式。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118148. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
The role of the arousal system in age-related differences in cortical functional network architecture.觉醒系统在皮质功能网络结构与年龄相关差异中的作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Feb 15;43(3):985-997. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25701. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
10
Parallel distributed networks dissociate episodic and social functions within the individual.并行分布式网络在个体内部分离了情节和社会功能。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Mar 1;123(3):1144-1179. doi: 10.1152/jn.00529.2019. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Language, mind and brain.语言、心智与大脑。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):713-722. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0184-4. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Performing group-level functional image analyses based on homologous functional regions mapped in individuals.基于个体中映射的同源功能区域进行组水平的功能图像分析。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Mar 25;17(3):e2007032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2007032. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
The individual functional connectome is unique and stable over months to years.个体功能连接组在数月至数年的时间内是独特且稳定的。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:676-687. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
4
Multilayer network switching rate predicts brain performance.多层网络切换速率预测大脑表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 26;115(52):13376-13381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814785115. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching.动态低频 EEG 相位同步模式在任务切换的主动控制中。
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:70-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.068. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
6
Short timescale abnormalities in the states of spontaneous synchrony in the functional neural networks in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者功能神经网路中自发同步状态的短期异常。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 22;20:128-152. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.028. eCollection 2018.
7
Spontaneous cortical activity transiently organises into frequency specific phase-coupling networks.自发性皮质活动会暂时组织成具有特定频率的相位耦合网络。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 30;9(1):2987. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05316-z.
8
Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits.任务诱发的大脑状态操控可改善个体特质预测。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 18;9(1):2807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04920-3.
9
Spatial Topography of Individual-Specific Cortical Networks Predicts Human Cognition, Personality, and Emotion.个体特定皮质网络的空间拓扑结构预测人类认知、个性和情绪。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jun 1;29(6):2533-2551. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy123.
10
Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation.功能性大脑网络主要由稳定的群体和个体因素决定,而不是认知或日常变化。
Neuron. 2018 Apr 18;98(2):439-452.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035.