• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性大脑网络主要由稳定的群体和个体因素决定,而不是认知或日常变化。

Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Neuron. 2018 Apr 18;98(2):439-452.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035
PMID:29673485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5912345/
Abstract

The organization of human brain networks can be measured by capturing correlated brain activity with fMRI. There is considerable interest in understanding how brain networks vary across individuals or neuropsychiatric populations or are altered during the performance of specific behaviors. However, the plausibility and validity of such measurements is dependent on the extent to which functional networks are stable over time or are state dependent. We analyzed data from nine high-quality, highly sampled individuals to parse the magnitude and anatomical distribution of network variability across subjects, sessions, and tasks. Critically, we find that functional networks are dominated by common organizational principles and stable individual features, with substantially more modest contributions from task-state and day-to-day variability. Sources of variation were differentially distributed across the brain and differentially linked to intrinsic and task-evoked sources. We conclude that functional networks are suited to measuring stable individual characteristics, suggesting utility in personalized medicine.

摘要

人类大脑网络的组织可以通过 fMRI 捕捉相关的大脑活动来测量。人们非常感兴趣的是了解大脑网络在个体或神经精神人群中如何变化,或者在执行特定行为时如何变化。然而,这种测量的合理性和有效性取决于功能网络在多大程度上随时间稳定或依赖于状态。我们分析了来自九名高质量、高采样个体的数据,以解析网络变异性在个体、会话和任务之间的幅度和解剖分布。至关重要的是,我们发现功能网络主要由共同的组织原则和稳定的个体特征主导,而任务状态和日常变化的贡献则要小得多。变异源在大脑中分布不均,并与内在和任务诱发的源不同程度地相关。我们的结论是,功能网络适合测量稳定的个体特征,这表明在个性化医疗中有一定的应用价值。

相似文献

1
Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation.功能性大脑网络主要由稳定的群体和个体因素决定,而不是认知或日常变化。
Neuron. 2018 Apr 18;98(2):439-452.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035.
2
The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.任务态功能连接的功能相关性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;41(12):2684-2702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks.一般功能连接:静息态和任务 fMRI 的共享特征可驱动功能脑网络中可靠且可遗传的个体差异。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:516-532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.068. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
The Segregation and Integration of Distinct Brain Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition.不同脑网络的分离与整合及其与认知的关系。
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;36(48):12083-12094. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2965-15.2016.
5
Cognitive benefit and cost of acute stress is differentially modulated by individual brain state.急性应激的认知益处和代价受到个体脑状态的不同调节。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1179-1187. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx043.
6
Refined measure of functional connectomes for improved identifiability and prediction.精细化功能连接组学度量,提高可识别性和预测能力。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4843-4858. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24741. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Characteristics of canonical intrinsic connectivity networks across tasks and monozygotic twin pairs.跨任务和同卵双胞胎对的典型内在连接网络的特征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Nov;35(11):5532-49. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22568. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
8
Probabilistic mapping of human functional brain networks identifies regions of high group consensus.人类功能脑网络的概率映射确定了具有高度组一致性的区域。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118164. Epub 2021 May 15.
9
Network variants are similar between task and rest states.网络变体在任务状态和休息状态之间相似。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117743. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117743. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
10
Quantifying Differences Between Passive and Task-Evoked Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in a Large-Scale Brain Simulation.在大规模大脑模拟中量化被动和任务诱发内在功能连接之间的差异。
Brain Connect. 2018 Dec;8(10):637-652. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0620.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning-based embedding of functional connectivity profiles for precision functional mapping.基于深度学习的功能连接图谱嵌入用于精准功能映射。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Sep 3;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.129. eCollection 2025.
2
Distributed Cortical Network Dynamics of Binocular Convergent Eye Movements in Humans.人类双眼会聚眼球运动的分布式皮质网络动力学
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 21:2025.08.15.670412. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.15.670412.
3
Individual differences shape conceptual representation in the brain.个体差异塑造大脑中的概念表征。

本文引用的文献

1
A computational model of shared fine-scale structure in the human connectome.人类连接组共享精细结构的计算模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 17;14(4):e1006120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006120. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
Behavioral interventions for reducing head motion during MRI scans in children.行为干预减少儿童 MRI 扫描中的头部运动。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:234-245. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Influences on the Test-Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility.
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 22:2025.08.22.671848. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.22.671848.
4
Considerations for conducting developmental neuroimaging research on mental health topics.开展心理健康主题发育神经影像学研究的注意事项。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02221-0.
5
Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?用于功能连接分析的体素级或区域级干扰回归:这重要吗?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 15;46(12):e70323. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70323.
6
Effects of measurement errors on relationships between resting-state functional connectivity and psychological phenotypes.测量误差对静息态功能连接与心理表型之间关系的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13105-0.
7
Transfer of motor learning is associated with patterns of activity in the default mode network.运动学习的迁移与默认模式网络中的活动模式相关。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Aug 14;23(8):e3003268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003268. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
Functional connectivity heterogeneity and consequences for clinical and cognitive prediction: Stage 2 registered report.功能连接异质性及其对临床和认知预测的影响:第二阶段注册报告
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Aug 12;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.107. eCollection 2025.
9
Dynamic functional connectivity: Why the controversy?动态功能连接性:为何存在争议?
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Nov 19;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00363. eCollection 2024.
10
Alignment of auditory artificial networks with massive individual fMRI brain data leads to generalisable improvements in brain encoding and downstream tasks.听觉人工网络与大量个体功能磁共振成像脑数据的对齐可带来大脑编码及下游任务方面的普遍改善。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Apr 8;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00525. eCollection 2025.
功能磁共振成像测试-重测信度的影响及其与行为效用的关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Nov 1;27(11):5415-5429. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx230.
4
Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.解析静息态功能磁共振连接成像中的时变波动。
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:437-455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
5
Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains.个体人类大脑的精准功能图谱
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):791-807.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity.通过内在功能连接估计个体内部的平行指状交叉分布式网络。
Neuron. 2017 Jul 19;95(2):457-471.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.038.
7
Resting-state fMRI correlations: From link-wise unreliability to whole brain stability.静息态 fMRI 相关:从连接层面的不可靠性到全脑稳定性。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:250-262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
8
Whole-brain connectivity dynamics reflect both task-specific and individual-specific modulation: A multitask study.全脑连接动力学反映了任务特异性和个体特异性的调节:一项多任务研究。
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?能否通过操控大脑状态来强调功能连接中的个体差异?
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 15;160:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.064. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Evidence for Two Independent Factors that Modify Brain Networks to Meet Task Goals.两个独立因素对脑网络进行调整以实现任务目标的证据。
Cell Rep. 2016 Oct 25;17(5):1276-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.002.