Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, School of Public Health, Universidad del Valle, Universidad del Valle Campus San Fernando, Cali, Colombia.
School of Medicine, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Villavicencio, Colombia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jan 21;14(1):e0007970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007970. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Arboviruses transmitted by day-biting Aedes mosquitoes are a major public health concern. With the challenges inherent in arbovirus vaccine and therapeutics development, vector control and bite prevention strategies are among the limited options available for immediate intervention. Bite prevention through personal protective technologies (PPT), such as topical mosquito repellents or repellent-impregnated clothing, may help to decrease biting rates and, therefore, the risk of disease in groups most susceptible to adverse outcomes from Zika virus. However, achieving high uptake and compliance with PPT can be challenging.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To gain an insight into the knowledge and concerns of pregnant women surrounding Zika and their opinions regarding PPT, particularly repellent clothing, a focus group study was carried out with pregnant women, women of reproductive age, and semi-structured interviews with their male partners in two cities in Colombia. The discussions revealed shortfalls in basic knowledge of Zika virus, with several pregnant participants reporting being unaware of the potential for Zika-related congenital malformations. Although participants generally considered Zika to be a significant personal threat, most rated it as less of a concern than dengue or diarrheal diseases. Overall, repellent clothing and other forms of PPT were viewed as effective, although some participants expressed concerns over the high costs of repellents, and safety fears of regular contact with repellent chemicals, which they perceived as potentially harmful. Plant-derived repellents were considered to be safer than synthetic chemical repellents. Discussions also highlighted that health centers were the preferred source of information on bite-reduction.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Achieving high uptake and compliance with PPT in populations most at risk of adverse outcomes from Zika infection requires engaging key users in open dialogue to identify and address any practical issues regarding PPT use, and concerns over safety. The findings presented here suggest that educational campaigns should strongly emphasize the risks associated with Zika during pregnancy, and discuss safety profiles of approved synthetic repellents and the availability of EPA-approved plant-based repellents. In addition, the economic and political context should be a major consideration when evaluating personal mosquito-repellent strategies.
通过白天叮咬的伊蚊传播的虫媒病毒是一个主要的公共卫生关注点。由于虫媒病毒疫苗和治疗方法的开发具有挑战性,因此控制病媒和预防叮咬策略是目前可供选择的有限干预措施之一。通过个人防护技术(PPT)进行预防叮咬,如涂抹驱蚊剂或使用驱蚊剂浸渍的衣物,可能有助于降低叮咬率,从而降低孕妇和其他对寨卡病毒不良后果易感性较高人群的疾病风险。然而,实现 PPT 的高采用率和合规性可能具有挑战性。
方法/主要发现:为了深入了解孕妇对寨卡病毒的认识和关注点,以及她们对 PPT(特别是驱蚊剂衣物)的看法,我们在哥伦比亚的两个城市开展了一项针对孕妇、育龄妇女的焦点小组研究,并对她们的男性伴侣进行了半结构化访谈。讨论结果显示,孕妇对寨卡病毒的基本知识存在不足,一些孕妇报告称不知道寨卡病毒可能导致先天畸形。尽管参与者普遍认为寨卡病毒对个人构成重大威胁,但大多数人认为其威胁性不如登革热或腹泻疾病。总体而言,驱蚊剂衣物和其他形式的 PPT 被认为是有效的,尽管一些参与者对驱蚊剂的高成本表示担忧,并且对经常接触驱蚊化学物质的安全问题表示担忧,他们认为这可能有害。植物源性驱蚊剂被认为比合成化学驱蚊剂更安全。讨论还强调,保健中心是减少叮咬信息的首选来源。
结论/意义:要在感染寨卡病毒后最易出现不良后果的人群中实现 PPT 的高采用率和合规性,需要让关键用户参与开放对话,以识别和解决 PPT 使用方面的任何实际问题以及对安全性的担忧。本文的研究结果表明,教育宣传活动应强烈强调怀孕期间与寨卡病毒相关的风险,并讨论经批准的合成驱蚊剂的安全概况以及 EPA 批准的植物性驱蚊剂的可获得性。此外,在评估个人驱蚊策略时,应将经济和政治背景作为一个主要考虑因素。