• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者治疗期间血红蛋白A与全因死亡率之间的关联:个性化目标和降糖治疗类型的重要性

Association between On-Treatment Haemoglobin A and All-Cause Mortality in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Importance of Personalized Goals and Type of Anti-Hyperglycaemic Treatment.

作者信息

Orsi Emanuela, Bonora Enzo, Solini Anna, Fondelli Cecilia, Trevisan Roberto, Vedovato Monica, Cavalot Franco, Zerbini Gianpaolo, Morano Susanna, Nicolucci Antonio, Penno Giuseppe, Pugliese Giuseppe

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Fondazione IRCCS "Cà Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico", 20122 Milan, Italy.

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 17;9(1):246. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010246.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9010246
PMID:31963486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7019548/
Abstract

The increased mortality reported with intensive glycaemic control has been attributed to an increased risk of treatment-related hypoglycaemia. This study investigated the relationships of haemoglobin (Hb) A, anti-hyperglycaemic treatment, and potential risks of adverse effects with all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients ( = 15,773) were stratified into four categories according to baseline HbA and then assigned to three target categories, based on whether HbA was ≤0.5% below or above (on-target), >0.5% below (below-target) or >0.5% above (above-target) their HbA goal, personalized according to the number of potential risks among age > 70 years, diabetes duration > 10 years, advanced complication(s), and severe comorbidity (ies). The vital status was retrieved for 15,656 patients (99.26%). Over a 7.4-year follow-up, mortality risk was increased among patients in the highest HbA category (≥8.5%) (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.47), < 0.001) and those above-target (1.42 (1.29-1.57), < 0.001). Risk was increased among individuals in the lowest HbA category (<6.5%) and those below-target only if treated with agents causing hypoglycaemia (1.16 (1.03-1.29), = 0.01 and 1.10 (1.01-1.22), = 0.04, respectively). These data suggest the importance of setting both upper and lower personalized HbA goals to avoid overtreatment in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with agents causing hypoglycaemia.

摘要

强化血糖控制导致死亡率升高被归因于治疗相关低血糖风险增加。本研究调查了2型糖尿病患者血红蛋白(Hb)A、降糖治疗及不良反应潜在风险与全因死亡率之间的关系。根据基线HbA将患者(n = 15773)分为四类,然后根据HbA相对于其HbA目标是低于目标值0.5%或以上(达标)、低于目标值>0.5%(未达标)或高于目标值>0.5%(超达标),并根据年龄>70岁、糖尿病病程>10年、存在晚期并发症和严重合并症等潜在风险数量进行个体化分层,分为三个目标类别。对15656例患者(99.26%)进行了生命状态检索。在7.4年的随访中,HbA最高类别(≥8.5%)的患者(调整后风险比,1.34(95%置信区间,1.22 - 1.47),P < 0.001)和超达标的患者(1.42(1.29 - 1.57),P < 0.001)的死亡风险增加。HbA最低类别(<6.5%)的个体以及仅在使用导致低血糖的药物治疗时未达标的个体的风险增加(分别为1.16(1.03 - 1.29),P = 0.01和1.10(1.01 - 1.22),P = 0.04)。这些数据表明,对于使用导致低血糖药物治疗的2型糖尿病高危个体,设定个性化HbA目标的上限和下限以避免过度治疗非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/a00af37abb99/jcm-09-00246-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/01eea1ca6721/jcm-09-00246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/87d437b400d8/jcm-09-00246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/a00af37abb99/jcm-09-00246-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/01eea1ca6721/jcm-09-00246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/87d437b400d8/jcm-09-00246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e653/7019548/a00af37abb99/jcm-09-00246-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between On-Treatment Haemoglobin A and All-Cause Mortality in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Importance of Personalized Goals and Type of Anti-Hyperglycaemic Treatment.2型糖尿病患者治疗期间血红蛋白A与全因死亡率之间的关联:个性化目标和降糖治疗类型的重要性
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 17;9(1):246. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010246.
2
Day-to-day fasting glycaemic variability in DEVOTE: associations with severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular outcomes (DEVOTE 2).DEVOTE 研究中的日常禁食血糖变异性:与严重低血糖和心血管结局的关联(DEVOTE2)。
Diabetologia. 2018 Jan;61(1):48-57. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4423-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection regimens in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.初诊 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年中持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射方案的比较:实用随机对照试验和经济评价。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 3;365:l1226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1226.
4
Effects of age, gender, and body mass index on efficacy and hypoglycaemia outcomes across treat-to-target trials with insulin glargine 100 U/mL added to oral antidiabetes agents in type 2 diabetes.年龄、性别和体重指数对基础胰岛素类似物 100U/mL 联合口服降糖药治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和低血糖结局的影响:一项基于目标的临床试验分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Nov;19(11):1546-1554. doi: 10.1111/dom.12966. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
6
7
Prior exposure to hyperglycaemia attenuates the relationship between glycaemic variability during critical illness and mortality.先前暴露于高血糖会减弱危重症期间血糖变异性与死亡率之间的关系。
Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Sep;18(3):189-97.
8
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL compared with glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (EDITION JP 2 randomised 12-month trial including 6-month extension).甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 治疗日本 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和低血糖:使用基础胰岛素加口服降糖药(EDITION JP 2 随机 12 个月试验,包括 6 个月的扩展)。
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Oct;43(5):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
9
Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus.针对2型糖尿病,强化血糖控制与传统血糖控制的对比研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 11(11):CD008143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008143.pub3.
10
A Patient-level Analysis of Efficacy and Hypoglycaemia Outcomes Across Treat-to-target Trials with Insulin Glargine Added to Oral Antidiabetes Agents in People with Type 2 Diabetes.在2型糖尿病患者中,将甘精胰岛素添加至口服抗糖尿病药物的达标治疗试验中,对疗效和低血糖结局进行的患者水平分析。
Eur Endocrinol. 2014 Feb;10(1):23-30. doi: 10.17925/EE.2014.10.01.23. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Elevated serum HbA1c level, rather than previous history of diabetes, predicts the disease severity and clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis.糖化血红蛋白水平升高,而非既往糖尿病病史,可预测急性胰腺炎的疾病严重程度和临床结局。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003070.
2
Influence of Serum Albumin on HbA1c and HbA1c-Defined Glycemic Status: A Retrospective Study.血清白蛋白对糖化血红蛋白及糖化血红蛋白定义的血糖状态的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 12;8:583093. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.583093. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
2
2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD.2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)合作制定的糖尿病、糖尿病前期和心血管疾病指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.
3
Effects of Severe Hypoglycemia on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Death in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.严重低血糖对退伍军人事务糖尿病试验心血管结局和死亡的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):157-163. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1144. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Non-albuminuric renal impairment is a strong predictor of mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Italian multicentre study.非白蛋白尿性肾功能不全是 2 型糖尿病患者死亡的强有力预测因素:肾功能不全和心血管事件(RIACE)意大利多中心研究。
Diabetologia. 2018 Nov;61(11):2277-2289. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4691-2. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
5
Glycaemic control and mortality in older people with type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II.2 型糖尿病老年患者的血糖控制与死亡率:弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究第二阶段。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2852-2859. doi: 10.1111/dom.13469. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Use of Intensive Glycemic Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus.老年 2 型糖尿病患者强化血糖管理的应用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1190-1194. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15335. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
7
Haemoglobin A1c variability is a strong, independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.糖化血红蛋白变异性是 2 型糖尿病患者全因死亡率的一个强有力的独立预测指标。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1885-1893. doi: 10.1111/dom.13306. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Achievement of Glycated Hemoglobin Goals in the US Remains Unchanged Through 2014.截至2014年,美国糖化血红蛋白目标的达成情况保持不变。
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Aug;8(4):863-873. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0280-5. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Intensive Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus -- A Balancing Act of Latent Benefit and Avoidable Harm: A Teachable Moment.2型糖尿病的强化血糖控制——潜在益处与可避免危害之间的平衡之举:一个值得汲取经验教训的时刻
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):300-1. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8320.
10
Rates of Deintensification of Blood Pressure and Glycemic Medication Treatment Based on Levels of Control and Life Expectancy in Older Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.基于糖尿病老年患者的控制水平和预期寿命的血压和血糖药物治疗的弱化率
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1942-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5110.