Suppr超能文献

反刍动物粪便污染饮用水在肯尼亚农村家庭收集后引入。

Ruminant Fecal Contamination of Drinking Water Introduced Post-Collection in Rural Kenyan Households.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(2):608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020608.

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, many families travel to collect water and store it in their homes for daily use, presenting an opportunity for the introduction of fecal contamination. One stored and one source water sample were each collected from 45 households in rural Kenya. All 90 samples were analyzed for fecal indicator bacteria ( and enterococci) and species-specific contamination using molecular microbial source tracking assays. Human (HF183), avian (GFD), and ruminant (BacR) contamination were detected in 52, two, and four samples, respectively. Stored water samples had elevated enterococci concentrations ( < 0.01, Wilcoxon matched pairs test) and more frequent BacR detection (89% versus 27%, < 0.01, McNemar's exact test) relative to source water samples. fsQCA (fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis) was conducted on the subset of households with no source water BacR contamination to highlight combinations of factors associated with the introduction of BacR contamination to stored water supplies. Three combinations were identified: (i) ruminants in the compound, safe water extraction methods, and long storage time, (ii) ruminants, unsafe water extraction methods, and no soap at the household handwashing station, and (iii) long storage time and no soap. This suggests that multiple pathways contribute to the transmission of ruminant fecal contamination in this context, which would have been missed if data were analyzed using standard regression techniques.

摘要

在撒哈拉以南非洲,许多家庭都会外出取水,并将其储存在家中以供日常使用,由此便有机会引入粪便污染。从肯尼亚农村的 45 户家庭中分别采集了一份储水样本和一份水源样本。对所有 90 个样本进行了粪便指示菌(和肠球菌)和基于分子微生物溯源检测法的特定物种污染分析。在 52 个样本中检测到了人源(HF183)、禽源(GFD)和反刍动物源(BacR)污染,分别在 2 个和 4 个样本中检测到了上述两种污染。与水源样本相比,储水样本中的肠球菌浓度更高(<0.01,Wilcoxon 配对检验),BacR 的检出率更高(89% 对 27%,<0.01,McNemar 确切检验)。对没有水源 BacR 污染的家庭子集进行了 fsQCA(模糊集定性比较分析),以突出与 BacR 污染引入储水供应相关的因素组合。确定了三种组合:(i)住所中存在反刍动物、安全的水提取方法和较长的储存时间,(ii)住所中存在反刍动物、不安全的水提取方法和家中没有洗手皂,以及(iii)较长的储存时间和没有洗手皂。这表明,在这种情况下,有多种途径会导致反刍动物粪便污染的传播,如果使用标准回归技术分析数据,这些途径可能会被忽略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3842/7027003/a9668f622f8f/ijerph-17-00608-g0A1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验